Canon 70 - 200 2.8 L (Page 3): I had version one and loved it for shooting in weddings and quinceaneras in churches. Version II is even better, so take the plunge and you will not...

Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum

Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰

Canon 70 - 200 2.8 L

Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>

Aug 11, 2014 12:19:02 #

AntonioReyna Loc: Los Angeles, California

I had version one and loved it for shooting in weddings and quinceaneras in churches. Version II is even better, so take the plunge and you will not regret it.

Farbuck wrote:

I'm thinking of taking the plunge and buying this lens. It's the newer one - the 2.8L IS II.

Does anyone have any opinions on it?

Thanks

Aug 11, 2014 13:22:14 #

jefflantzimages Loc: Seattle

i agree with the others. i have the older 70-200 but it is my workhorse. i often add a 1.4 when i want to distance myself from people. with this combination i am less intrusive and have obtained some wonderful candid shots from all over the world. have fun.

Aug 11, 2014 13:59:17 #

avman Loc: Normal IL

Farbuck wrote:

I'm thinking of taking the plunge and buying this lens. It's the newer one - the 2.8L IS II.

Does anyone have any opinions on it?

Thanks

I wanted to purchase the 2.8L IS I before I retired. Like many others on the forum, finances dictate what you may spend for your equipment, so my purchase was nixed, temporarily. I did purchase the 2.8L IS II two years ago. My other half has valued it in contempt for a very much higher value than I actually paid for it. Would I do it again? YUUUUUUP. In a heartbeat! I rarely take it off my camera body. I really enjoy working with this glass! I am not sorry I made the leap, despite the grief I receive for making the purchase. Even my other half has noticed an improvement in my shots. It isn't a be all end all, but pretty close to it. In short - DO IT!

Aug 11, 2014 14:18:12 #

lukan Loc: Chicago, IL

studavis wrote:

I love my Tamron 70- 200 and the $1,000+ I saved and it is rated with the Canon or in some cases sharper.

The Canon is definitely built better and I love its color rendition, contrast, and the focus speed on Canon bodies. On Canon bodies, I'd definitely go with the Canon glass! :thumbup: :D

Aug 11, 2014 15:04:19 #

FSATIN Loc: Westchester, NY

Why are you selling it if it is such a great lens? Also what exact model # do you have?

Aug 11, 2014 15:46:40 #

Morrisdh Loc: Pisgah Alabama

Farbuck wrote:

I'm thinking of taking the plunge and buying this lens. It's the newer one - the 2.8L IS II.

Does anyone have any opinions on it?

Thanks

I love mine, it is one sharp lens and has become my walk
around lens on my Canon 7D . OH and I have a cure for the weight. mdh

Aug 11, 2014 18:59:17 #

Farbuck Loc: Newtown Square, PA

Folks:

Thanks for the glowing reviews. As soon as I finish dinner, the plunge will be taken.

Thanks again for getting me over the hump,

Aug 11, 2014 19:51:36 #

lukan Loc: Chicago, IL

Farbuck wrote:

Folks:

Thanks for the glowing reviews. As soon as I finish dinner, the plunge will be taken.

Thanks again for getting me over the hump,

Plunge? CANON-ball!!! Congratulations! :thumbup: :-D

Aug 11, 2014 20:20:51 #

Farbuck Loc: Newtown Square, PA

lukan wrote:

Plunge? CANON-ball!!! Congratulations! :thumbup: :-D

Canon-ball I did

Aug 11, 2014 20:23:38 #

speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho

Farbuck wrote:

I'm thinking of taking the plunge and buying this lens. It's the newer one - the 2.8L IS II.

Does anyone have any opinions on it?

Thanks

Be aware, you might never want to take it of your camera again! (have mine for about 3 years now and love it).

Aug 11, 2014 20:59:57 #

lukan Loc: Chicago, IL

Congratulations! Great job! Welcome to the head of the class!

Aug 11, 2014 21:00:48 #

lukan Loc: Chicago, IL

Farbuck wrote:

Canon-ball I did

A+ ! :D :thumbup:

Aug 12, 2014 20:31:07 #

raymondh Loc: Walker, MI

Haydon wrote:

I own this medium telephoto and it's one of the finest lenses Canon makes. It's very sharp with great color and contrast. I should have owned it a long time ago.

The F2.8 is perfect for low light conditions and built like a tank. I'd highly recommend this lens. Remember this lens isn't a lightweight and might take some time to get use to.

I have it also & I totally agree!

Aug 12, 2014 21:55:19 #

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

Farbuck wrote:

Folks:

Thanks for the glowing reviews. As soon as I finish dinner, the plunge will be taken.

Buck, you got 2, right?
One for me, right?! :lol:
Congrats
SS

Aug 13, 2014 16:36:19 #

Swamp Gator Loc: Coastal South Carolina

I have the older non IS version and it is the biggest hunk of junk item of camera gear in existence.

Here's a shot I took with it this past weekend at 200mm.
If this is the best I can expect from it I might as well just go ahead and fling it in the swamp. :-)

(Download)

Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>

If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.

Main Photography Discussion

Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections

UglyHedgehog.com - Forum