In general: Canon vs Nikon
Jul 22, 2014 02:03:34 #
You can ride a Harley and shoot a Nikon...
Or you can be a wannabe.
Simple as that. :wink:
(Stand by for a fire storm...) :lol:
Or you can be a wannabe.
Simple as that. :wink:
(Stand by for a fire storm...) :lol:
Jul 22, 2014 02:46:52 #
Racmanaz wrote:
SharpSnooper has access to my webcam??? :shock: ;-)
Don't worry Rac, you're deepest secrets are safe with me!
Because if I told anybody, I'd have to kill MYSELF!! :lol:
It would be THAT embarrassing!
SS
Jul 22, 2014 05:36:51 #
This is like the "My Ford can beat your Chevy." argument. Either will work fine if you master thhe basics of photography. Neither will help if you do not know what you are doing. I use Canon because I had aCanon 35mm SLR and the lenses I already owned fit the Canon DSLR. For Canon I would recommend a 70D to start. It is not entry level but will help you achieve your "high hopes." Physically pick up and handle both Canon and Nikon cameras and choose whichever feels best to you. Then concentrate on your photography which is more important that which camera you own.
Jul 22, 2014 05:54:06 #
Arlene777 wrote:
I haven't noticed a lot of mention of Canon cameras. For those who own them, what do you recommend for entry l)evel and enthusiasts (I have high goals..lol) and for those who do not prefer them, can you share with me why? Thanks.
I don't own Canon, but have used them - and I can highly recommend them to you if you are starting out. The same for Nikon. It's a very competitive marketplace, so there is not a lot of product differentiation at the entry level. Things start to get a bit specialized when you start paying over $2000 for a camera body and $2400 for a single lens. And again, it is more a question of bias and not any measure of real functionality or image quality.
Jul 22, 2014 06:06:53 #
A Big Girl camera and lens(es) in a $1000 budget. (And preferable Canon). The best camera would be the 70D, an advanced model above your entry-level. But, you'll have to live (initially) with whatever single lens that comes in the bundle...
Another approach would be a T3i bundle with EF-S 18-55 IS II lens new from say B&H around $550 and a EF 70-300MM F/4-5.6 IS used from KEH at $325. The more advanced camera bodies will eat most of your budget. Probably your first camera body should be new even though I'm one of the more vocal proponents of always buying used or refurbished for value.
You can do much the same set-up with Nikon for a D3200 (entry-level model one back from their newest D3300). B&H is selling off bundles this morning with two lenses for less than $600.
Another approach would be a T3i bundle with EF-S 18-55 IS II lens new from say B&H around $550 and a EF 70-300MM F/4-5.6 IS used from KEH at $325. The more advanced camera bodies will eat most of your budget. Probably your first camera body should be new even though I'm one of the more vocal proponents of always buying used or refurbished for value.
You can do much the same set-up with Nikon for a D3200 (entry-level model one back from their newest D3300). B&H is selling off bundles this morning with two lenses for less than $600.
Jul 22, 2014 06:32:21 #
I'll say a used Canon 1D Mark III with a Canon 85mm 1.8 lens. Then add a 40mm canon pancake lens later for 200 dollars. No video capability here though...
Jul 22, 2014 06:33:20 #
Lou37
Loc: Long Island, N.Y.
I started out as a Canon user with the AE-1, and the new F1. Then auto focus cameras appeared and all of my Canon lenses became useless unless I purchased adapters which are not the best way to go. I decided to change to Nikon (F5) and never looked back. In my opinion Nikon is more customer oriented. They kept the same mount and did not force their users to resort to adapters.
Jul 22, 2014 06:41:04 #
Arlene777 wrote:
I haven't noticed a lot of mention of Canon cameras. For those who own them, what do you recommend for entry l)evel and enthusiasts (I have high goals..lol) and for those who do not prefer them, can you share with me why? Thanks.
If high quality is your game, go ahead, get it over with, and purchase the EOS 5D Mark III and get the 70-200 f/2.8 L VRII and a L series wide angle lens too ! You won't be sorry that you did !
Jul 22, 2014 06:50:59 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Here are some previous topics on UHH. Many Canon enthusiasts here :)
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/search.jsp?q=canon&u=&sr=true&s=1
I have the T3i SLR + the SX50 super zoom.
You should try the feel of different cameras in your hands - there can be quite a difference, and you want it to be comfortable and natural.
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/search.jsp?q=canon&u=&sr=true&s=1
I have the T3i SLR + the SX50 super zoom.
You should try the feel of different cameras in your hands - there can be quite a difference, and you want it to be comfortable and natural.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 22, 2014 06:54:51 #
oldmalky
Loc: West Midlands,England.
The canon is a great camera so is the nikon and my camera the sony is also great,now if what you have to spend is $1000 the last thing you will ever need is all the very expensive lens that sharp shooter tells us about, so the better question to ask is what would be best in my price range because there are some very fine machines out there, but be prepared you will still get people telling you to spend more than what you have said, best of luck i wont try to sway you as whatever you choose will be fine.
Jul 22, 2014 07:11:21 #
Arlene777 wrote:
I haven't noticed a lot of mention of Canon cameras. For those who own them, what do you recommend for entry l)evel and enthusiasts (I have high goals..lol) and for those who do not prefer them, can you share with me why? Thanks.
I'd go to a good camera store, B &H if you can visit New York, and get the feel of several in your price range, the best camera if it is uncomfortable in your hands is not going to be the best for you, ex the Sl1 is too small for both my son and I, he got a T5i and I aT4i, I could go for a 70D but I did not feel I needed the extra features, go feel hat you reading about. Bob.
Jul 22, 2014 07:16:27 #
OlinBost
Loc: Marietta, Ga.
All things considered both cameras are good. (in my opinion equal). Just find one that does what you want to do and can afford. More important (and this also applies to me) just use it.
Jul 22, 2014 07:18:19 #
Why do you only discuss Nikon and Canon as if they were the only brands available? I have used both but prefer Sony to either of them.
Jul 22, 2014 07:20:23 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Arlene, welcome to the Hog. br I think you have s... (show quote)
On the other hand, Nikon equipment is very good. :D
Jul 22, 2014 07:24:07 #
Cameras and lenses are only tools. Regardless of brand you need to find a camera within your budget that will fit your hands and make you feel comfortable.
I have used Nikon cameras and lenses for more than 50 years and the system has proved to be very reliable. I am sure Canon users will say the same.
Today technology is pretty advanced and available to all camera manufacturers. Some cameras are going to be more reliable than others based on price. Lenses in general are of excellent quality, even independent lens makers are manufacturing excellent optics.
Base your decision on the camera that will make you feel comfortable considering your budget and your photo goals.
Today it is hard to go wrong.
I have used Nikon cameras and lenses for more than 50 years and the system has proved to be very reliable. I am sure Canon users will say the same.
Today technology is pretty advanced and available to all camera manufacturers. Some cameras are going to be more reliable than others based on price. Lenses in general are of excellent quality, even independent lens makers are manufacturing excellent optics.
Base your decision on the camera that will make you feel comfortable considering your budget and your photo goals.
Today it is hard to go wrong.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.