If I were to upgrade to a newer Canon, one that would do more, could I successfully upgrade to something without going to a full frame camera? I say this because I wouldn't have to replace all my lens.
Can I hear some input positive or negative? I now shoot with a t3i and as I've said before I'd never sell it but it would be a great back up camera.
If I were going to upgrade to a higher Canon in the APS-C format, the 70d would be my choice. It will offer significant upgrades from your T3i.
T3i is a fine camera, great for a backup. The EOS-70D would be an upgrade of types, with the main upgrade being a better focus system IF you do video, and the secondary upgrade the moveable live-view display.
More important, are all your lenses of the type useable ONLY on APS-C cameras (EF-S)? Remember that standard EF lenses can be used on both APS and standard-sensor cameras. That should impact your choice. If wanted to limit to just APS sensor cameras, I'd go with the EOS7D. It's got a great sensor system (very close to the one on the EOS1D Mk IV, I believe) and a much higher burst frame rate. Downside: different memory card.
Canon 70D. Best out there right now for video and darn good camera
JC56
Loc: Lake St.Louis mo.
canon t series are their entry level dslr's....they have a lot of great cameras between the t and the mk series.....canon makes great cameras.....when I win the lotto I'm switching brands.
pentax shooter.
Don't be so hasty. I'm a Canon guy, but Pentax is making some fine cameras these days.
mickley wrote:
Don't be so hasty. I'm a Canon guy, but Pentax is making some fine cameras these days.
If the OP has much Canon Glass, wouldn't he also need to make an investment in new lenses? Pentax is great for sure. But sometimes staying with a brand to avoid having to spend money on new glass is the way to go.
JC56
Loc: Lake St.Louis mo.
I have a k5.......their focus system sucks....it takes longer to focus on a subject than it did elmer fudd to shoot bugs bunny.....it's okay for landscapes and non moving objects.....but it hunts more than 6 rednecks on unemployment.
I have a T2i and I have 3 aftermarket (Tamron) lenses, and all 3 are EF lenses just in case I want to go full frame when and if I upgrade. After seeing the 70D I may finally do the upgrade. And by the way, the EF lenses work great on my EF-S camera.
JC56 wrote:
I have a k5.......their focus system sucks....it takes longer to focus on a subject than it did elmer fudd to shoot bugs bunny.....it's okay for landscapes and non moving objects.....but it hunts more than 6 rednecks on unemployment.
Then I suggest you go over some of the reviews (seemingly everywhere online these days) and focus on getting a newer Pentax body that has good focusing system reviews. Replacing all that glass won't be cheap.
JC56
Loc: Lake St.Louis mo.
mickley wrote:
Then I suggest you go over some of the reviews (seemingly everywhere online these days) and focus on getting a newer Pentax body that has good focusing system reviews. Replacing all that glass won't be cheap.
true... but most of my decent glass is sigma....I can get the mounts changed at a reasonable price.
JC56 wrote:
true... but most of my decent glass is sigma....I can get the mounts changed at a reasonable price.
I maybe bit a bit out of tune on this, but are all the mounts and lenses for autofocus? If they are manual focus lenses, I think all your Sigmas are effectively obsolete. I've tried used manual-focus Canon FD lenses on modern AF EOS cameras, and the results weren't that good -- light loss, less sharp, etc. I finally accepted the obvious: my Canon FD lenses are obsolete and thus unusable. I've consoled myself with the thought that lenses are getting better all the time.
Rbrylawski wrote:
If I were going to upgrade to a higher Canon in the APS-C format, the 70d would be my choice. It will offer significant upgrades from your T3i.
RB, do you want to get a FF?
If so, how many EF's lenses are you invested in? Keep in mind that they can BE sold. Yes you would take at least some loss, but possibly could be very minimal. Just saying.
Also, Why would you keep the old one as a back-up, unless you do paid events, where its absolutely necessary. I've never actually needed a back-up, knock on wood. They just get old and worthless. For at least a while it's possible to get rid of them for at least a small amount. again, just saying. :-)
SS
Ted - Have a look at the timeline graphic at the bottom of this wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Canon_EOS_digital_cameras You can get the tech specs from the table above for more details on specific models. Regarding your question, you'll get more of a jump / difference in capability by changing class of camera as well as generation as the next newer model in the same class is not much of a difference.
As already mentioned the 70D keeps compatibility with your EF-S lenses. The 60D is a bargain at the moment as these old bodies are sold off, but it's the same generation processor and you'll be challenged to really see a difference beyond a slightly larger file.
I have been using the Canon 60d for a few years. I also have great lenses I can use on a full frame if I decide to move up. until I can master my currant equipment I do not want any more confusion in my life now. Happy New Year !!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.