Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
A new Pope
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
Mar 14, 2013 17:10:21   #
MagicFad Loc: Clermont, FL
 
RixPix wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
RixPix wrote:
pounder35 wrote:
The way the media covered the news of a new Pope and the fact the "bookies" had betting lines on who it would be leaves me with one question. Who cares? Sounds more like the Super Bowl. Being what's best described as agnostic it will have no effect on my life whatsoever. And even if I were Catholic I still don't know why it matters. Maybe someone can explain it. Keep it simple since I have ATD or something like that. Basically I get bored really fast and don't need to know the entire history of Christianity or Catholicism. This is a simple question and I'm looking for a simple answer. I'll ask again. "What difference does it make who the Pope is."
The way the media covered the news of a new Pope a... (show quote)




I agree in that it doesn't make a difference which guy wears the biggest funny hat. They all adhere to an outdated dogma so it really makes no difference who the Pope is or was. Once he is Pope he tows the line and continues the psychosis that is the Catholic religion.
quote=pounder35 The way the media covered the new... (show quote)


Thanks for hateful post.
quote=RixPix quote=pounder35 The way the media c... (show quote)


Some people mistake the truth for hate when it contradicts what they believe. That being said, the truth is nothing but the truth.
quote=yhtomit quote=RixPix quote=pounder35 The ... (show quote)


Some people develop eye strain looking for trouble.

Reply
Mar 14, 2013 17:18:43   #
lporrel Loc: California
 
MagicFad wrote:
lporrel wrote:
MagicFad wrote:
lporrel wrote:
MagicFad wrote:
lporrel wrote:
amyinsparta wrote:
All the religions have failed the people because they are all based on guilt and punishment. It has come to past that the people are tired of 2000 year old beliefs that do not help them raise their consciousnesses. Instead, the same tired old sermons, with the same tired old prejudices, the same hates for those unlike themselves who believe differently, the same old quest to make their beliefs the law of the land, and on and on. How to fix it? Do what Jesus says to do- love your neighbor(all others), don't do anything to them that you would not want done to yourself, forgive 70x7, be a good Samaritan(helping those in need, no matter who or what they are), understand that Jesus came to raise us up to a higher level of spiritual thinking based on love for ALL-unconditional love, which is something we ALL have trouble with. Look to the Light, not to tired, worn out church laws with rituals designed for those who think they and only they have the answer. If it worked, there would not be so many seeking answers.
All the religions have failed the people because t... (show quote)


Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult and left untried. –G.K. Chesterton.

All of our information about Jesus comes from the Bible. The Bible comes from the Church. No Church = no Bible = no Jesus.

Also, Jesus never said, “Do not to others what you would not have them do you.” Instead, he said, “DO to others what you would have them do to you.” I subtle but enormous difference that leads me to question even your basic understanding of what Jesus was really about.

The popular culture is willing to accept Jesus only in the undemanding character of Prince of Peace. But he is not a simple man (or a simple God). In the Bible (the only record we have of his actual words) he says ...

“Do not think that I came to bring peace on Earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's enemies will be the members of his household.”

And, “I have come to cast fire upon the Earth; and how I wish it were already kindled!”

And, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit.”

And, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me."

And, "I am the sheepgate. All that came before me were theves and robbers."

And, “Very truly I tell you, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him.

“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.”
quote=amyinsparta All the religions have failed t... (show quote)

You are in err, there IS information about Jesus not from the church.
quote=lporrel quote=amyinsparta All the religion... (show quote)


Discredited "gospels" that no serious scholar of history takes seriously? Or are you referring to the wild imaginings of contemporary, New-Age would-be mystics.
quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quote=amyinsparta ... (show quote)


Here are but a few of them, the list goes on.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Witnesses
There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan Greek sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity and try to explain away the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events that surrounded his life. Let’s look at these hostile accounts and see what they tell us about Jesus:

Thallus (52AD)
Thallus is perhaps the earliest secular writer to mention Jesus and he is so ancient that his writings don’t even exist anymore. But Julius Africanus, writing around 221AD does quote Thallus who had previously tried to explain away the darkness that occurred at the point of Jesus’ crucifixion:

“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.” (Julius Africanus, Chronography, 18:1)

If only more of Thallus’ record could be found, we would see that every aspect of Jesus’ life could be verified with a non-biblical source. But there are some things we can conclude from this account: Jesus lived, he was crucified, and there was an earthquake and darkness at the point of his crucifixion.

Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Early Christians are also described in secular history. Pliny the Younger, in a letter to the Roman emperor Trajan, describes the lifestyles of early Christians:

“They (the Christians) were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food—but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”

This EARLY description of the first Christians documents several facts: the first Christians believed that Jesus was GOD, the first Christians upheld a high moral code, and these early followers et regularly to worship Jesus.

Suetonius (69-140AD)
Suetonius was a Roman historian and annalist of the Imperial House under the Emperor Hadrian. His writings about Christians describe their treatment under the Emperor Claudius (41-54AD):

“Because the Jews at Rome caused constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus (Christ), he (Claudius) expelled them from the city (Rome).” (Life of Claudius, 25:4)

This expulsion took place in 49AD, and in another work, Suetonius wrote about the fire which destroyed Rome in 64 A.D. under the reign of Nero. Nero blamed the Christians for this fire and he punished Christians severely as a result:

“Nero inflicted punishment on the Christians, a sect given to a new and mischievous religious belief.” (Lives of the Caesars, 26.2)

There is much we can learn from Suetonius as it is related to the life of early Christians. From this very EARLY account, we know that Jesus had an immediate impact on his followers. They believed that Jesus was God enough to withstand the torment and punishment of the Roman Empire. Jesus had a curious and immediate impact on his followers, empowering them to die courageously for what they knew to be true.

Tacitus (56-120AD)
Cornelius Tacitus was known for his analysis and examination of historical documents and is among the most trusted of ancient historians. He was a senator under Emperor Vespasian and was also proconsul of Asia. In his “Annals’ of 116AD, he describes Emperor Nero’s response to the great fire in Rome and Nero’s claim that the Christians were to blame:

“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.”

In this account, Tacitus confirms for us that Jesus lived in Judea, was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and had followers who were persecuted for their faith in Christ.

Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Sometime after 70AD, a Syrian philosopher named Mara Bar-Serapion, writing to encourage his son, compared the life and persecution of Jesus with that of other philosophers who were persecuted for their ideas. The fact that Jesus is known to be a real person with this kind of influence is important. As a matter of fact, Mara Bar-Serapion refers to Jesus as the “Wise King”:

“What benefit did the Athenians obtain by putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as judgment for their crime. Or, the people of Samos for burning Pythagoras? In one moment their country was covered with sand. Or the Jews by murdering their wise king?…After that their kingdom was abolished. God rightly avenged these men…The wise king…Lived on in the teachings he enacted.”

From this account, we can add to our understanding of Jesus. We can conclude that Jesus was a wise and influential man who died for his beliefs. We can also conclude that his followers adopted these beliefs and lived lives that reflected them to the world in which they lived.

Phlegon (80-140AD)
In a manner similar to Thallus, Julius Africanus also mentions a historian named Phlegon who wrote a chronicle of history around 140AD. In this history, Phlegon also mentions the darkness surrounding the crucifixion in an effort to explain it:

“Phlegon records that, in the time of Tiberius Caesar, at full moon, there was a full eclipse of the sun from the sixth to the ninth hour.” (Africanus, Chronography, 18:1)

Phlegon is also mentioned by Origen (an early church theologian and scholar, born in Alexandria):

“Now Phlegon, in the thirteenth or fourteenth book, I think, of his Chronicles, not only ascribed to Jesus a knowledge of future events . . . but also testified that the result corresponded to His predictions.” (Origen Against Celsus, Book 2, Chapter 14)

“And with regard to the eclipse in the time of Tiberius Caesar, in whose reign Jesus appears to have been crucified, and the great earthquakes which then took place … ” (Origen Against Celsus, Book 2, Chapter 33)

“Jesus, while alive, was of no assistance to himself, but that he arose after death, and exhibited the marks of his punishment, and showed how his hands had been pierced by nails.” (Origen Against Celsus, Book 2, Chapter 59)

From these accounts, we can add something to our understand of Jesus and conclude that Jesus had the ability to accurately predict the future, was crucified under the reign of Tiberius Caesar and demonstrated his wounds after he was resurrected!

Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Lucian was a Greek satirist who spoke sarcastically of Christ and Christians, but in the process, he did affirm that they were real people and never referred to them as fictional characters:

“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day—the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account….You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property.” (Lucian, The Death of Peregrine. 11-13)

From this account we can add to our description and conclude that Jesus taught about repentance and about the family of God. These teachings were quickly adopted by Jesus’ followers and exhibited to the world around them.

Celsus (175AD)
This is the last hostile ‘pagan’ account we will examine (although there are many other later accounts in history). Celsus was quite hostile to the Gospels, but in his criticism, he unknowingly affirms and reinforces the authors and their content. His writing is extensive and he alludes to 80 different Biblical quotes, confirming their early appearance in history. In addition, he admits that the miracles of Jesus were generally believed in the early 2nd century! Here is a portion of his text:
quote=lporrel quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quo... (show quote)


Great quotes. Thank you very much! This is not at all what I thought you were talking about. I would point out, however, that all of these classical works were preserved and came down to us only through Western Catholic Monasticism (i.e., "The Church") or, in some cases, perhaps Scholasticism.
quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quote=MagicFad qu... (show quote)

Doesn't matter how they came down, I suppose you have data to back up that claim?
quote=lporrel quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quo... (show quote)


Why do you say is does not matter? You started by saying that "All the religions have failed the people." This is one very big way in which religion has not failed. Also, please notice that the non-Christian quotes that you provided do not give us anything close to the type of insight into Jesus’ teaching, such as you quoted (sort of) in your initial post, that we get from the Christianity. There are many others ways in which Christianity has been a raging success. For example…
--Free universal public education: “education for the poor was officially mandated by the Church in 1179 when it decreed that every cathedral must assign a master to teach boys too poor to pay the regular fee” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_education#Europe_2).
--Hospitals: “The declaration of Christianity as accepted religion in the Roman Empire drove an expansion of the provision of care. Following First Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. construction of a hospital in every cathedral town was begun” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitals#History).
--Science: “By the late Middle Ages, a synthesis of Catholicism and Aristotelianism known as Scholasticism was flourishing in Western Europe, which had become a new geographic center of science” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#History).
--Human rights: “Combining Jewish, Greek, and Roman teachings with the radical new teachings of Christ and St. Paul, Christianity helped to cultivate the cardinal ideas of dignity, equality, liberty and democracy that ground the modern human rights paradigm” (http://www.amazon.com/Christianity-Human-Rights-John-Witte/dp/0521143748).

Apart from all of this, that classical Latin scholarship was preserved only through Catholic monasticism is common knowledge to anyone who has any understanding of Western history, and you can start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_the_Irish_Saved_Civilization.

In short, the beautiful values that you proclaimed in your initial post are entirely the product of Christianity. That you recognize the truth in Christianity attests to God’s personal presence in your own life. But again, that truth in no way stands apart from the Church Jesus founded.

Reply
Mar 14, 2013 17:31:32   #
mickeys Loc: Fort Wayne, IN
 
pounder35, yes we do have one or more in the white house. They are called Republicans, Democrats. Every one of them is in it for them selfs. Can't blame one person for the foughts of the many. They give themselfs raises without the peoples input Time to get over it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2013 17:32:11   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
MagicFad wrote:
RixPix wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
RixPix wrote:
pounder35 wrote:
The way the media covered the news of a new Pope and the fact the "bookies" had betting lines on who it would be leaves me with one question. Who cares? Sounds more like the Super Bowl. Being what's best described as agnostic it will have no effect on my life whatsoever. And even if I were Catholic I still don't know why it matters. Maybe someone can explain it. Keep it simple since I have ATD or something like that. Basically I get bored really fast and don't need to know the entire history of Christianity or Catholicism. This is a simple question and I'm looking for a simple answer. I'll ask again. "What difference does it make who the Pope is."
The way the media covered the news of a new Pope a... (show quote)




I agree in that it doesn't make a difference which guy wears the biggest funny hat. They all adhere to an outdated dogma so it really makes no difference who the Pope is or was. Once he is Pope he tows the line and continues the psychosis that is the Catholic religion.
quote=pounder35 The way the media covered the new... (show quote)


Thanks for hateful post.
quote=RixPix quote=pounder35 The way the media c... (show quote)


Some people mistake the truth for hate when it contradicts what they believe. That being said, the truth is nothing but the truth.
quote=yhtomit quote=RixPix quote=pounder35 The ... (show quote)


That would be true if your post wasn't actually hateful and full of insults. You may say what you want, we know your true colors.
quote=RixPix quote=yhtomit quote=RixPix quote=... (show quote)


My Colors...Red, White & Blue...the Constitution of the United States and the sovereignty of this nation are important to me. The fact that a given number of the population of this country bow to some foreign religious leader is to say the least discomforting. To me there is no difference between the Catholic church's doctrines and those of Sharia law as both try to infringe on the freedoms guaranteed to all citizens by the Constitution.

Reply
Mar 14, 2013 19:25:21   #
Bmac Loc: Long Island, NY
 
RixPix wrote:
To me there is no difference between the Catholic church's doctrines and those of Sharia law as both try to infringe on the freedoms guaranteed to all citizens by the Constitution.

Right, no difference at all. :lol:

Reply
Mar 14, 2013 19:49:33   #
Redman Loc: Wappingers Falls, N.Y.
 
Easy to see just how unimportant The Pope is when he voices his opinion on a topic such as abortion.

Reply
Mar 14, 2013 20:00:07   #
robbygb Loc: UK
 
MagicFad wrote:
RixPix wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
RixPix wrote:
pounder35 wrote:
The way the media covered the news of a new Pope and the fact the "bookies" had betting lines on who it would be leaves me with one question. Who cares? Sounds more like the Super Bowl. Being what's best described as agnostic it will have no effect on my life whatsoever. And even if I were Catholic I still don't know why it matters. Maybe someone can explain it. Keep it simple since I have ATD or something like that. Basically I get bored really fast and don't need to know the entire history of Christianity or Catholicism. This is a simple question and I'm looking for a simple answer. I'll ask again. "What difference does it make who the Pope is."
The way the media covered the news of a new Pope a... (show quote)




I agree in that it doesn't make a difference which guy wears the biggest funny hat. They all adhere to an outdated dogma so it really makes no difference who the Pope is or was. Once he is Pope he tows the line and continues the psychosis that is the Catholic religion.
quote=pounder35 The way the media covered the new... (show quote)


Thanks for hateful post.
quote=RixPix quote=pounder35 The way the media c... (show quote)


Some people mistake the truth for hate when it contradicts what they believe. That being said, the truth is nothing but the truth.
quote=yhtomit quote=RixPix quote=pounder35 The ... (show quote)


Some people develop eye strain looking for trouble.
quote=RixPix quote=yhtomit quote=RixPix quote=... (show quote)


Ha ha ha, good going guys, it seems you guys in the USA are not happy unless you have something to moan and whinge about! If it's not Gun Law, and the right to own a gun!! it's that nice Mr Obama, your lovely President who the majority of you voted in AGAIN!! and now it's the new Pope!! What will it be next week??
We in the Uk have the same problems as you with politics and the like, but try to keep it to ourselves, after all this is a photography forum.
I know this is in the ' chit chat, non photography' section, so you don't have to tell me that again, but it used to be an amusing section with jokes and humour from guys like Sarge69 and many other of you guys like him with your daily humour to brighten up the day. Perhaps Admin could start a new forum for Gun Lovers and Obama Haters, or do we like the new Pope forum? I am sure it would fill quite a few pages a day. Or.. we could have a Cameron Haters section, where every member from the UK could have a moan and whinge about him, :lol: :lol:
So, come on WABBIT and all of your band of followers, have a go at this and let's have another laugh, or shall we all just keep it to photography were people like myself who are new to photography, can learn from the many proffessional and experianced guys and gals from all corners of the universe who are willing to help and share the experiances on this site?
Now let's see who is first to respond to this?? :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2013 21:35:17   #
MagicFad Loc: Clermont, FL
 
lporrel wrote:
MagicFad wrote:
lporrel wrote:
MagicFad wrote:
lporrel wrote:
MagicFad wrote:
lporrel wrote:
amyinsparta wrote:
All the religions have failed the people because they are all based on guilt and punishment. It has come to past that the people are tired of 2000 year old beliefs that do not help them raise their consciousnesses. Instead, the same tired old sermons, with the same tired old prejudices, the same hates for those unlike themselves who believe differently, the same old quest to make their beliefs the law of the land, and on and on. How to fix it? Do what Jesus says to do- love your neighbor(all others), don't do anything to them that you would not want done to yourself, forgive 70x7, be a good Samaritan(helping those in need, no matter who or what they are), understand that Jesus came to raise us up to a higher level of spiritual thinking based on love for ALL-unconditional love, which is something we ALL have trouble with. Look to the Light, not to tired, worn out church laws with rituals designed for those who think they and only they have the answer. If it worked, there would not be so many seeking answers.
All the religions have failed the people because t... (show quote)


Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult and left untried. –G.K. Chesterton.

All of our information about Jesus comes from the Bible. The Bible comes from the Church. No Church = no Bible = no Jesus.

Also, Jesus never said, “Do not to others what you would not have them do you.” Instead, he said, “DO to others what you would have them do to you.” I subtle but enormous difference that leads me to question even your basic understanding of what Jesus was really about.

The popular culture is willing to accept Jesus only in the undemanding character of Prince of Peace. But he is not a simple man (or a simple God). In the Bible (the only record we have of his actual words) he says ...

“Do not think that I came to bring peace on Earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's enemies will be the members of his household.”

And, “I have come to cast fire upon the Earth; and how I wish it were already kindled!”

And, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit.”

And, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me."

And, "I am the sheepgate. All that came before me were theves and robbers."

And, “Very truly I tell you, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him.

“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.”
quote=amyinsparta All the religions have failed t... (show quote)

You are in err, there IS information about Jesus not from the church.
quote=lporrel quote=amyinsparta All the religion... (show quote)


Discredited "gospels" that no serious scholar of history takes seriously? Or are you referring to the wild imaginings of contemporary, New-Age would-be mystics.
quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quote=amyinsparta ... (show quote)


Here are but a few of them, the list goes on.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Witnesses
There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan Greek sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity and try to explain away the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events that surrounded his life. Let’s look at these hostile accounts and see what they tell us about Jesus:

Thallus (52AD)
Thallus is perhaps the earliest secular writer to mention Jesus and he is so ancient that his writings don’t even exist anymore. But Julius Africanus, writing around 221AD does quote Thallus who had previously tried to explain away the darkness that occurred at the point of Jesus’ crucifixion:

“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.” (Julius Africanus, Chronography, 18:1)

If only more of Thallus’ record could be found, we would see that every aspect of Jesus’ life could be verified with a non-biblical source. But there are some things we can conclude from this account: Jesus lived, he was crucified, and there was an earthquake and darkness at the point of his crucifixion.

Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Early Christians are also described in secular history. Pliny the Younger, in a letter to the Roman emperor Trajan, describes the lifestyles of early Christians:

“They (the Christians) were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food—but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”

This EARLY description of the first Christians documents several facts: the first Christians believed that Jesus was GOD, the first Christians upheld a high moral code, and these early followers et regularly to worship Jesus.

Suetonius (69-140AD)
Suetonius was a Roman historian and annalist of the Imperial House under the Emperor Hadrian. His writings about Christians describe their treatment under the Emperor Claudius (41-54AD):

“Because the Jews at Rome caused constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus (Christ), he (Claudius) expelled them from the city (Rome).” (Life of Claudius, 25:4)

This expulsion took place in 49AD, and in another work, Suetonius wrote about the fire which destroyed Rome in 64 A.D. under the reign of Nero. Nero blamed the Christians for this fire and he punished Christians severely as a result:

“Nero inflicted punishment on the Christians, a sect given to a new and mischievous religious belief.” (Lives of the Caesars, 26.2)

There is much we can learn from Suetonius as it is related to the life of early Christians. From this very EARLY account, we know that Jesus had an immediate impact on his followers. They believed that Jesus was God enough to withstand the torment and punishment of the Roman Empire. Jesus had a curious and immediate impact on his followers, empowering them to die courageously for what they knew to be true.

Tacitus (56-120AD)
Cornelius Tacitus was known for his analysis and examination of historical documents and is among the most trusted of ancient historians. He was a senator under Emperor Vespasian and was also proconsul of Asia. In his “Annals’ of 116AD, he describes Emperor Nero’s response to the great fire in Rome and Nero’s claim that the Christians were to blame:

“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.”

In this account, Tacitus confirms for us that Jesus lived in Judea, was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and had followers who were persecuted for their faith in Christ.

Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Sometime after 70AD, a Syrian philosopher named Mara Bar-Serapion, writing to encourage his son, compared the life and persecution of Jesus with that of other philosophers who were persecuted for their ideas. The fact that Jesus is known to be a real person with this kind of influence is important. As a matter of fact, Mara Bar-Serapion refers to Jesus as the “Wise King”:

“What benefit did the Athenians obtain by putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as judgment for their crime. Or, the people of Samos for burning Pythagoras? In one moment their country was covered with sand. Or the Jews by murdering their wise king?…After that their kingdom was abolished. God rightly avenged these men…The wise king…Lived on in the teachings he enacted.”

From this account, we can add to our understanding of Jesus. We can conclude that Jesus was a wise and influential man who died for his beliefs. We can also conclude that his followers adopted these beliefs and lived lives that reflected them to the world in which they lived.

Phlegon (80-140AD)
In a manner similar to Thallus, Julius Africanus also mentions a historian named Phlegon who wrote a chronicle of history around 140AD. In this history, Phlegon also mentions the darkness surrounding the crucifixion in an effort to explain it:

“Phlegon records that, in the time of Tiberius Caesar, at full moon, there was a full eclipse of the sun from the sixth to the ninth hour.” (Africanus, Chronography, 18:1)

Phlegon is also mentioned by Origen (an early church theologian and scholar, born in Alexandria):

“Now Phlegon, in the thirteenth or fourteenth book, I think, of his Chronicles, not only ascribed to Jesus a knowledge of future events . . . but also testified that the result corresponded to His predictions.” (Origen Against Celsus, Book 2, Chapter 14)

“And with regard to the eclipse in the time of Tiberius Caesar, in whose reign Jesus appears to have been crucified, and the great earthquakes which then took place … ” (Origen Against Celsus, Book 2, Chapter 33)

“Jesus, while alive, was of no assistance to himself, but that he arose after death, and exhibited the marks of his punishment, and showed how his hands had been pierced by nails.” (Origen Against Celsus, Book 2, Chapter 59)

From these accounts, we can add something to our understand of Jesus and conclude that Jesus had the ability to accurately predict the future, was crucified under the reign of Tiberius Caesar and demonstrated his wounds after he was resurrected!

Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Lucian was a Greek satirist who spoke sarcastically of Christ and Christians, but in the process, he did affirm that they were real people and never referred to them as fictional characters:

“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day—the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account….You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property.” (Lucian, The Death of Peregrine. 11-13)

From this account we can add to our description and conclude that Jesus taught about repentance and about the family of God. These teachings were quickly adopted by Jesus’ followers and exhibited to the world around them.

Celsus (175AD)
This is the last hostile ‘pagan’ account we will examine (although there are many other later accounts in history). Celsus was quite hostile to the Gospels, but in his criticism, he unknowingly affirms and reinforces the authors and their content. His writing is extensive and he alludes to 80 different Biblical quotes, confirming their early appearance in history. In addition, he admits that the miracles of Jesus were generally believed in the early 2nd century! Here is a portion of his text:
quote=lporrel quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quo... (show quote)


Great quotes. Thank you very much! This is not at all what I thought you were talking about. I would point out, however, that all of these classical works were preserved and came down to us only through Western Catholic Monasticism (i.e., "The Church") or, in some cases, perhaps Scholasticism.
quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quote=MagicFad qu... (show quote)

Doesn't matter how they came down, I suppose you have data to back up that claim?
quote=lporrel quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quo... (show quote)


Why do you say is does not matter? You started by saying that "All the religions have failed the people." This is one very big way in which religion has not failed. Also, please notice that the non-Christian quotes that you provided do not give us anything close to the type of insight into Jesus’ teaching, such as you quoted (sort of) in your initial post, that we get from the Christianity. There are many others ways in which Christianity has been a raging success. For example…
--Free universal public education: “education for the poor was officially mandated by the Church in 1179 when it decreed that every cathedral must assign a master to teach boys too poor to pay the regular fee” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_education#Europe_2).
--Hospitals: “The declaration of Christianity as accepted religion in the Roman Empire drove an expansion of the provision of care. Following First Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. construction of a hospital in every cathedral town was begun” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitals#History).
--Science: “By the late Middle Ages, a synthesis of Catholicism and Aristotelianism known as Scholasticism was flourishing in Western Europe, which had become a new geographic center of science” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#History).
--Human rights: “Combining Jewish, Greek, and Roman teachings with the radical new teachings of Christ and St. Paul, Christianity helped to cultivate the cardinal ideas of dignity, equality, liberty and democracy that ground the modern human rights paradigm” (http://www.amazon.com/Christianity-Human-Rights-John-Witte/dp/0521143748).

Apart from all of this, that classical Latin scholarship was preserved only through Catholic monasticism is common knowledge to anyone who has any understanding of Western history, and you can start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_the_Irish_Saved_Civilization.

In short, the beautiful values that you proclaimed in your initial post are entirely the product of Christianity. That you recognize the truth in Christianity attests to God’s personal presence in your own life. But again, that truth in no way stands apart from the Church Jesus founded.
quote=MagicFad quote=lporrel quote=MagicFad qu... (show quote)

Now you are confusing me, are you for or against Christianity?

Reply
Mar 14, 2013 23:00:29   #
pounder35 Loc: "Southeast of Disorder"
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
pounder35 wrote:
treehugger wrote:
I normally don't like to get involved in these p...ing contests, but this time I think I will. I don't believe the poster has any interest in an answer to his question, he simply want's to show his contempt for any religion.

"Lets move along folks, there is nothing happening here."


There is no "contempt". I was straight up in the original post. I am actually curious. If Cardinal A is elected, selected, whatever over Cardinal B or C what will be the difference on your life. Why not answer the question instead of downgrading me and avoiding a straight answer. I really don't care but if it matters to you (A,B,C) I want to hear why.
quote=treehugger I normally don't like to get inv... (show quote)



It makes a big difference Pounder... on several levels... actually I like the selection. He is one who has often spoken of corruption and the need to expose and deal with it, at this very moment the Catholic Church faces another scandal of its own making and firm and straight forward leadership is called for in facing this challenge head on, hopefully this Pope will do this.

Secondly although holding firm to the teachings of Christ as a Jesuit, meaning that he will not necessarily soften his views to accommodate liberalism of the church, he has demonstrated himself to be a man who is truly concerned with the plight of the poor, he has done so in his ministry and his continued fight for the rights of the poor in his country of Argentina, and also in the example he set in his personal life, by eschewing all the lavish trappings that were afforded to him by his status in the church. He lived a very modest life as a cardinal even though his position in the church would have afforded him a much more lavish lifestyle... This gives us hope for his sincerity and purity of intent.

Lastly, as the church recognizes this pope as it's leader it helps to renew the faith of Latinos in this hemisphere and recognize their contribution to the catholic faith, personally I was hoping that the pope would be selected from South America as Latinos support the church through their allegiance and devotion to the church as few other groups do, they represent close to 40% of all Catholics in the world.....

This Pope has the opportunity to renew faith and lead the church on a different path than the one that it was on... it does make a difference.
quote=pounder35 quote=treehugger I normally don'... (show quote)


Ok, I understand what your are saying. So Christians (of course Catholics fall under that classification) have a certain belief in that Jesus Christ was the son of God. Those of the Jewish faith disagree even though they acknowledge Jesus. The Muslims in their Holy book the Koran do the same. So it boils down to was Jesus the son of God or are we all mixed up? This gets confusing since I've never read the Bible or the Koran or any other Holy book. So who do I believe? What about the Hindus or the Buddhists? Let's go further. The Aztecs and Maya. (and yes Maya is the correct term.) This should bring some interesting response. First off, this is not to cause trouble. It's to hear different points of view. After a day or two of feedback I'll put this on my "Unwatch" list and go to a different forum. Politics and religion are pretty much taboo anywhere. What the hell. I'll stick to General Photography from now on. I'm tired of the pissed off reply's I get from people that can't answer a simple question. The truth sometimes hurts but that's life.
:thumbup:

Reply
Mar 14, 2013 23:49:54   #
Diogenes
 
Why is it that a site such as this, that has so much photographic knowledge to impart, is filled with more than its share of argumentative fools and sophomoric ignorami?

Reply
Mar 15, 2013 00:02:37   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
pounder35 wrote:

Ok, I understand what your are saying. So Christians (of course Catholics fall under that classification) have a certain belief in that Jesus Christ was the son of God. Those of the Jewish faith disagree even though they acknowledge Jesus. The Muslims in their Holy book the Koran do the same. So it boils down to was Jesus the son of God or are we all mixed up? This gets confusing since I've never read the Bible or the Koran or any other Holy book. So who do I believe? What about the Hindus or the Buddhists? Let's go further. The Aztecs and Maya. (and yes Maya is the correct term.) This should bring some interesting response. First off, this is not to cause trouble. It's to hear different points of view. After a day or two of feedback I'll put this on my "Unwatch" list and go to a different forum. Politics and religion are pretty much taboo anywhere. What the hell. I'll stick to General Photography from now on. I'm tired of the pissed off reply's I get from people that can't answer a simple question. The truth sometimes hurts but that's life.
:thumbup:
br Ok, I understand what your are saying. So Chri... (show quote)


Pounder, I am an agnostic who does not really deny nor affirm the god of the bible, I see both the beauty and the ugliness of religion... I see the ugliness in pastors like that freak just up the road in Gainesville, and in evangelicals who tell all but the most faithful of their flock that they are all going to hell, or even the lesser evangelicals who seem to always sit in judgement of others... I have never believed that an entity as evolved and enlightened as god or Jesus Christ could ever condemn a soul to damnation for a lack of faith in a god that they can not witness..

I have also seen the strength that faith has given to people in their daily struggles and in their times of need, almost as if through their faith and outreach to their deity they find answers and resolve to move forward where others would simply give up... Or where they make time to do charitable work for others.. and that is where I see the beauty of religion and of faith....

Their are 1.2 billion catholics in the world, it is by far the most important religion in South and Central America and very important here in the US... I think that church is very important to these people, and that if this pope can help to restore the church and cleanse it of the scandals that seem to have plagued it that this can only be a positive thing... The church makes a difference in millions and millions of lives, why would we not be hopeful for the success of this pope and the restoration of faith in the teachings of the church....

I have never been hurt by someone else's faith in god, and I can honestly say that I have seen faith make life tolerable for people during the most trying of times, through difficulties that have persisted for years with no relief in sight... now why would I ever want to see that taken away from them?

Reply
 
 
Mar 15, 2013 01:14:11   #
DaryleH Loc: Mount Vernon, WA
 
Its been a toss up between this site and a Flyfishing website as to has the most Whiny Peeholes, so far this site is in First place, ;-)

Reply
Mar 15, 2013 01:17:14   #
Uncle Chuck
 
pounder35 wrote:
Blurryeyed wrote:
pounder35 wrote:
treehugger wrote:
I normally don't like to get involved in these p...ing contests, but this time I think I will. I don't believe the poster has any interest in an answer to his question, he simply want's to show his contempt for any religion.

"Lets move along folks, there is nothing happening here."


There is no "contempt". I was straight up in the original post. I am actually curious. If Cardinal A is elected, selected, whatever over Cardinal B or C what will be the difference on your life. Why not answer the question instead of downgrading me and avoiding a straight answer. I really don't care but if it matters to you (A,B,C) I want to hear why.
quote=treehugger I normally don't like to get inv... (show quote)



It makes a big difference Pounder... on several levels... actually I like the selection. He is one who has often spoken of corruption and the need to expose and deal with it, at this very moment the Catholic Church faces another scandal of its own making and firm and straight forward leadership is called for in facing this challenge head on, hopefully this Pope will do this.

Secondly although holding firm to the teachings of Christ as a Jesuit, meaning that he will not necessarily soften his views to accommodate liberalism of the church, he has demonstrated himself to be a man who is truly concerned with the plight of the poor, he has done so in his ministry and his continued fight for the rights of the poor in his country of Argentina, and also in the example he set in his personal life, by eschewing all the lavish trappings that were afforded to him by his status in the church. He lived a very modest life as a cardinal even though his position in the church would have afforded him a much more lavish lifestyle... This gives us hope for his sincerity and purity of intent.

Lastly, as the church recognizes this pope as it's leader it helps to renew the faith of Latinos in this hemisphere and recognize their contribution to the catholic faith, personally I was hoping that the pope would be selected from South America as Latinos support the church through their allegiance and devotion to the church as few other groups do, they represent close to 40% of all Catholics in the world.....

This Pope has the opportunity to renew faith and lead the church on a different path than the one that it was on... it does make a difference.
quote=pounder35 quote=treehugger I normally don'... (show quote)


Ok, I understand what your are saying. So Christians (of course Catholics fall under that classification) have a certain belief in that Jesus Christ was the son of God. Those of the Jewish faith disagree even though they acknowledge Jesus. The Muslims in their Holy book the Koran do the same. So it boils down to was Jesus the son of God or are we all mixed up? This gets confusing since I've never read the Bible or the Koran or any other Holy book. So who do I believe? What about the Hindus or the Buddhists? Let's go further. The Aztecs and Maya. (and yes Maya is the correct term.) This should bring some interesting response. First off, this is not to cause trouble. It's to hear different points of view. After a day or two of feedback I'll put this on my "Unwatch" list and go to a different forum. Politics and religion are pretty much taboo anywhere. What the hell. I'll stick to General Photography from now on. I'm tired of the pissed off reply's I get from people that can't answer a simple question. The truth sometimes hurts but that's life.
:thumbup:
quote=Blurryeyed quote=pounder35 quote=treehugg... (show quote)


Ponder; it makes NO difference WHO is elected Pope, only that someone IS elected Pope to carry on the works of the Catholic church AND to continue the Papal linage that, by backtracking, leads to the Last Supper, where Christ instituted the church we know today as Catholic. And thanks for starting such a lively conversation!

Reply
Mar 15, 2013 01:21:37   #
Hal81 Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
 
MisterWilson wrote:
Although I'm not Catholic, I found it interesting to watch the process strictly for its historical significance. It was inspiring to see that many people gathered together for a joyful event.

Secondly, I appreciate the fact that this leader is chosen without regard to his personal status in life ... wealth, family name, and personal ambition has nothing to do with who is chosen.

Mostly, I look forward to the day when the Saviour himself, Jesus Christ, will receive the honor and glory due to Him in Heaven and Earth, as the triune God-- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;
Philippians 2:10
Although I'm not Catholic, I found it interesting ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 15, 2013 07:06:36   #
ted45 Loc: Delaware
 
Diogenes wrote:
Why is it that a site such as this, that has so much photographic knowledge to impart, is filled with more than its share of argumentative fools and sophomoric ignorami?


We need them to balance out the arrogant, contemptuous know-it-alls.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.