It's not important that we see colors differently, unless you are deficient in certain parts of the spectrum and your job involves color evaluation.

What IS important is that we have ICC standard monitor calibration, so that we evaluate color from the same *relative* frame of reference. You might adjust your images with more warmth than I would, but they're YOUR images, and I can only assume you used a calibrated, profiled monitor when adjusting them. At least, that's the assumption of most labs if you order "machine prints" or "no color adjustment" be done to your files. I calibrate my monitors monthly, and my prints are a very close match to them.

A key point of color management is to get printers and monitors to match closely, so the color you see on your monitor is the color that comes from the lab (within reason... It's never perfect). But it's also nice to see the color with a standard frame of reference to what another photographer or designer intended you to see... However you see color.

In the portrait lab where I worked, we tested folks' color vision when they applied to work in Color Correction. We calibrated/profiled all nine identical monitors to the same numerical aim points. We calibrated/profiled all 40 printers to match closely, as well. The result was that any of our color correctors could adjust a job and send it to any printer, with results that were within our tolerance standards.

Ahhh, important to those in business maybe.
A camera's color rendition is not important to me, neither is my monitor.
Just the view on A monitor, or the print. I'll either change it if I want to or live with it.
My colors don't have to be accurate to .000001 percent.
I will never calibrate a monitor.
I'm not that picky.
And since my wife is the only viewer who MAY know if a color is off, how would anyone know, other than me since they were not at the shooting location?
Only the photographer knows for sure, unless there is an obvious WB error.

Ahhh, important to those in business maybe.
A camera's color rendition is not important to me, neither is my monitor.
Just the view on A monitor, or the print. I'll either change it if I want to or live with it.
My colors don't have to be accurate to .000001 percent.
I will never calibrate a monitor.
I'm not that picky.
And since my wife is the only viewer who MAY know if a color is off, how would anyone know, other than me since they were not at the shooting location?
Only the photographer knows for sure, unless there is an obvious WB error.

Not everyone is as concerned as some of those in BUSINESS.

Take for example this photo: https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.dpreview.com/sample_galleries/3180508572/9041518123.jpg?X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA4NPXSRZN2I2XWOXX/20211110/us-east-1/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20211110T014402Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=c2722d367278e0a88668b39f4096742b68210b578620b1c8f27788a7c85fe6fe
which took me a few minutes to find in DPReview's sample gallery for the Nikon D5. Auto-WB did that. I don't personally know that dog but I'm betting I've met enough dogs to know that's not really a purple dog.