DirtFarmer wrote:
For you guys that don't have Lightroom, there is a program called "Exposure Plot" which might give you a clue. You give it a folder and it will look through all the image files in that folder (you can include subfolders) and give you a histogram of focal lengths. Also ISO, Shutter speed, and something else (aperture?)
https://www.vandel.nl/Interesting App.
It showed my shooting with a 630mm, which I don't own. Looking at exif properties, I'm not sure if I agree with the analysis.
Lens was my 70-300, zoomed out to 300mm with a 1.4x teleconverter, making it a 420mm.
Lens was on my Nikon D5600 (cropped sensor). The application reported the 35mm equivalent format at 630mm.
I guess the app is doing that "trick" throughout as 18mm isn't displayed at all for my photos, the low end of my 18-140mm.
Topic has been beaten to death here. Cropped versus FF, the focal length of the lens doesn't change - that's my view on it.
There were just a few shoots, as I was just seeing how the 1.4x worked with the 70-300 nikor, which Nikon says isn't compatible with their teleconverters.
That aside to answer Paul's survey, it looks like my kit 18-140mm is my most used. Too bad the program doesn't grab the lens data, as I have overlapping focal lengths with my 70-300.
I also have a 40mm Macro/Micro, so that skews things a bit too, making it difficult to really tell what my predominately used lens is.
I don't have LR, so your post was of interest.
For those that do have LR, does the analysis in there alter the FL to that 35mm equivalent format? - Just wondering.
The image is from my home brewed app, pulling exif properties with Phil Harvey's exiftool.exe application.
Does LR report the actual lens in it's analysis?