Timmie wrote:
I want to shoot action Photos of school games and matches, I would like to share them with the kids and Parents, maybe a website or something not sure yet. Is their a issue with Privacy Laws ? What are the Privacy Laws with posting pictures ?
You should definitely check with the school administration first. They may have an agreement with a photographer, that you'd be infringing upon. There are also a lot of limitations on photography whenever kids are involved and especially on school property.
Not sure what you mean by "sharing" your images... Do you mean "sell" them? Or do you mean "give" them away free?
Freebies are a very bad idea for a number of reasons. One, you'll be using up your gear and doing a lot of work for no return at all. And you'll need fast, expensive gear to photograph a lot of sports. Giving away your work for free also devalues photography to your "clients". Once you give it away, why would anyone ever pay for it? The better quality your work that's being freely given away, the worse it is for photography in general!
I was recently part of a discussion on another site recently where a designer was asking a photographer to provide a free print to display in a $12 million home they were remodeling. A lot of people griped about the designer and obviously wealthy home owner (who was probably unaware of the request).... But I tried to point out that photographers had to take some of the blame, too. There are so many who are just giving away now, who "get a thrill" that someone likes their work, it's set a new low standard. We've "trained" consumers to expect free photography. Look at the ads on your local Craigslist sometime (last time I looked at my local CL, there were 700 "wedding" photographer ads, most of whom were shooting for free or so little that they would be out of business in a year or as soon as their Rebel broke).
Don't be part of the problem. Ask a fair price for your images. (It's another thing if you're just shooting your own kids and maybe a couple of their friends.)
I do allow my watermarked proofs to be freely taken and posted on Facebook or Instagram or wherever. They're max 700 pixels on the longest side, too small for printing and have a watermark that's essentially an ad to drive more visitors to my galleries. That's a form of free promotion. Rather than fighting people taking photos for FB, etc., I just made it work for me.
If you sell, there are a number of websites especially for hosting that sort of thing. I use Zenfolio. They host the images, take the orders, deal with the billing and do the printing & shipping. I just take the photos and upload proofs to the site, then when orders come in I'll finish the images as needed. Working through a site like Zenfolio, I'm able to offer a wide range of products, ranging in price from a few dollars to several hundred dollars.
I shoot a lot of sporting events where there are kids. I'm the "official" photographer. I'm there at the invitation and full knowledge of the organizer. They give me access and a little bit of promotion (such as links from their websites)... I support them with some photos for their websites and such.
NOTHING I shoot at those events gets posted online unless I have signed permission from the parent or guardian, in the case of minors... or from the subject in the case of an adult. It's essentially a model release, giving me permission to display online. Because I shoot a lot of equestrian events, I also get a property release (for the horse). It's all combined in a single form, though. The forms they complete also help me organize the images much better. On the other hand, if they don't sign, they'll never see the photos.
Another reason for getting signed releases is because there's not a lot of money to be made anymore, selling photos this way. Fifteen years ago I could make $3000 off a typical event. Today I'm lucky if I see 1/3 or 1/4 of that. So I am also archiving images and planning to offer some of the better ones as stock photos. Releases are essential, for stock photos to have any value.