Night Shot San Francisco Embarcadero (Page 2): Thank you very much.

flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico

phlash46 wrote:

Nice shooting!

Thank you very much.

Abo

SuperflyTNT wrote:

The rule was against contradicting their mandate, based on the misconception that the Sun revolved, (not rotated) around the earth.

Ya don't say!

SuperflyTNT wrote:

The idea that living in caves and trees was a rule is preposterous.

Your garish representation of the OP’s photo is also preposterous.

LOL "Preposterous"... that's a big word

I'm glad you disagree.

And I know the difference between "revolved" & "rotated" but unlike you
I just couldn't be fagged differentiating... my word's bigger than yours... NA NA NA Narn Naahhh!

Best wishes.

Abo

ISOlate Loc: Maine

To the UHH member posting the edited photo:

Your username is offensive in the extreme, highly pejorative and crudely racist to most Aussies. Why did you choose it?

jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana

flyguy wrote:

Yes, I do mind, the way I posted the image was the way I intended to have the image viewed. If I wanted the white balance other than that, I would have changed it.

You have no right to change images posted here without getting prior permission of the poster.

junglejim1949 Loc: Sacramento,CA

flyguy wrote:

This is from December 27,2010 and was taken with my Canon 50D and 10-22 mm lens.

Update to this post, seems that someone on here didn't care for my rendition of the photo and took it upon himself to change the white balance of the photo.

Being a 4th generation San Franciscan, I really appreciate this shot.

lmTrying Loc: WV Northern Panhandle

flyguy wrote:

This is from December 27,2010 and was taken with my Canon 50D and 10-22 mm lens.

Update to this post, seems that someone on here didn't care for my rendition of the photo and took it upon himself to change the white balance of the photo.

I like your post. It's warm, natural, and inviting.

The other "corrected" image is cold, mechanical, and has no soul.

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

Abo wrote:

LOL "Preposterous"... that's a big word

I'm glad you disagree.

And I know the difference between "revolved" & "rotated" but unlike you
I just couldn't be fagged differentiating... my word's bigger than yours... NA NA NA Narn Naahhh!

Best wishes.

Abo

Ok, so you knew the right word but chose to use the wrong one?
And you couldn’t be “fagged” differentiating yet you have no problem trying to defen the indefensible. I’d think if your world was so big there would be room for big words.

lmTrying Loc: WV Northern Panhandle

SuperflyTNT wrote:

You are the deluded one. The idea that the Sun “r... (show quote)

Superfly, you do realize that you are arguing with God's Gift to.... everything. He is always correct and never wrong....in his own mind. He thinks he is "outstanding". He is.... Out standing in his own field, or would that be outback.

SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA

lmTrying wrote:

Superfly, you do realize that you are arguing with God's Gift to.... everything. He is always correct and never wrong....in his own mind. He thinks he is "outstanding". He is.... Out standing in his own field, or would that be outback.

😜🤪🤣
I have to admit I enjoy helping him make himself look foolish.

JeffDavidson Loc: Originally Detroit Now Los Angeles

You should get the photographers permission before making any unwanted changes.

JeffDavidson Loc: Originally Detroit Now Los Angeles

Like it or not, that's the way the photographer "saw it" and that's the way he wanted it viewed. He likes yellow and you like blue. That's not right or wrong, it's different.

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

Alan, you bring up a very good point but it's not white balance. White balance is only part of the equation. It's also a good catch-all in situations such as this. A good part of the issue is hue contamination. This is a subject for which I created a post some time ago. Apparently, not many were either interested or grasped the point. It disappeared from the thread in a day. Anyway, that is something to consider when doing photographs such as this one, regardless of whether the photographer likes this presentation or not.
--Bob
;

Abo wrote:

Kewl.

Hope you don't mind, I got the white balance closer to reality,
tweaked the light levels, got rid of the inverted keystoning (vertical perspective error)
and leveled the horizon.

Cheers,

Alan.

flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico

ISOlate wrote:

To the UHH member posting the edited photo:

Your username is offensive in the extreme, highly pejorative and crudely racist to most Aussies. Why did you choose it?

Thank you for your input --- I learned something I never knew because of it.

flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico

jaymatt wrote:

Thank you for your input, it is much appreciated.