Night Shot San Francisco Embarcadero
Mar 5, 2022 12:22:47 #
HistoryLover
Loc: Landenberg,Pa.
flyguy wrote:
Sorry you feel that way, this section wasn't intended for what transpired.
I will reiterate what I wrote above: The point of all this discourse is the that "The Photo Gallery" which this is, is not the place to do what that man did, the "Photo Analysis section" is:
"... where we scrutinize photos and discuss specific issues of a given shot."
I will reiterate what I wrote above: The point of all this discourse is the that "The Photo Gallery" which this is, is not the place to do what that man did, the "Photo Analysis section" is:
"... where we scrutinize photos and discuss specific issues of a given shot."
Nothing against you. I was referring to what happened to your photo and how defensive the offender was. He was totally wrong. You were in the right. Keep posting.
Mar 5, 2022 13:33:34 #
Hey flyboy, better lower the nose before you stall out and spin in. So, ABO erred by not asking your permission, first. Big deal. It's an amateur photo forum not a contest. In my opinion, he improved YOUR photo significantly, and politely said he hoped you didn't mind him doing so. But instead of learning from his obvious ability as a talented editor, you admonish him with a temper tantrum. Jeez.
Mar 5, 2022 13:50:04 #
ghill42 wrote:
Hey flyboy, better lower the nose before you stall out and spin in. So, ABO erred by not asking your permission, first. Big deal. It's an amateur photo forum not a contest. In my opinion, he improved YOUR photo significantly, and politely said he hoped you didn't mind him doing so. But instead of learning from his obvious ability as a talented editor, you admonish him with a temper tantrum. Jeez.
You call that “talented”?
Mar 5, 2022 15:54:33 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Not even man enough to admit you were wrong and apologize.
Poor Diddums... got his diaper in a knot.
Mar 5, 2022 17:32:44 #
flyguy wrote:
This is from December 27,2010 and was taken with my Canon 50D and 10-22 mm lens.
Update to this post, seems that someone on here didn't care for my rendition of the photo and took it upon himself to change the white balance of the photo.
Update to this post, seems that someone on here didn't care for my rendition of the photo and took it upon himself to change the white balance of the photo.
Mar 5, 2022 21:17:43 #
Abo wrote:
Poor Diddums... got his diaper in a knot.
Thank you for making my point.
Mar 6, 2022 07:52:12 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Thank you for making my point.
Your point bud, is making mountains out of mole hills.
Instead of being a second rate pedant all your life,
go get your camera, and go shoot your unimaginative bird
photos (the same as a billion other bird photos)
that require no original thought whatsoever
like you always do bud, because that
suits brainwashed marionettes such as yourself
perfectly.
Mar 6, 2022 10:38:18 #
vicksart wrote:
Since I have seen this view at night many times, I must say in your original shot the white balance more closely matches my recollection. While I like your version more, I was a bit distracted by the “leaning” light post, but agree it’s improper to edit someone’s photo without permission. Hold your ground on that.
Thank you,Vicky. I posted this image on impulse and could have fixed it up had I taken the time to do so.
Many people seem to like the reddish glow of incandescent light in night photos, so I will continue to post them when I feel it adds mood to a scene.
Mar 7, 2022 10:21:10 #
Mar 7, 2022 10:28:16 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Thank you for making my point.
Thanks for your response.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.