lbrande wrote:
I have an Epson P800 Printer I've had for quite some time. Since I hadn't used the printer, I cleaned and aligned the print heads. All the patterns are perfect.
Now for the problem.
I printed several photographs. One, in an ice rink had a distinctive cyan tint. Another, a landscape, had a magenta tint.
Does anyone know what printer color settings I can use to try to get the printer to print the photos correctly. Assisting with a procedure for the proper settings would help also.
I'm running Win 7, and cannot upgrade, so a new printer is out of the question.
I have an Epson P800 Printer I've had for quite so... (
show quote)
Let's assume the printer is in good shape. That leaves color management as your issue. Let's troubleshoot:
Do you adjust images? If so, and if the monitor calibration and/or ICC monitor profile is off target, then your prints will be light, dark, or off color.
Is your operating system set to use the right (current) ICC profile for the monitor? It likely came with generic profiles for all the common monitors in use at release time, but if you change monitors after support for the OS is dead — which it is for Win 7 — then you have to supply your own profile. And if the monitor has been adjusted randomly, it's screwed up anyway. (I have to recalibrate and profile mine anytime I adjust images, because my wife and kids can't seem to keep their hands off the adjustments!)
Is your software's color setting right? Some post-processing software allows configuration to use a specific monitor (or dual monitors) and a specific proofing or simulation profile. Study up on that. Proofing profiles are supposed to show you what the output from a given printer will look like. Making final file adjustments with a proofing profile active can get you closer matches to your monitor.
Is the correct ICC profile for the EXACT combination of paper, ink, and printer model installed and activated in EITHER your software OR the printer driver, BUT NOT BOTH? Be sure it is. NOT profiling, WRONG profiling, and DOUBLE profiling will all lead to printing "bird cage liners."
With the right color management conditions, and a printer in good shape, your prints should be a near exact match for the monitor images. The match is not perfect, because you are comparing RGB (a color model where adding red, green, and blue makes every color from black up to white) with CMYKXXXXX (a color model where the various inks subtract white light from paper to make every color down to black).
Various companies provide free, downloadable reference images you can print with no changes, plus a reference print for comparison with your output. Marrutt has one. A reference image (no print) comes with every color calibration kit I've seen, so you can compare the uncalibrated and calibrated results after profiling your monitor.
My point is that color is a system. Everything starts with a properly *calibrated and **profiled monitor.
*Calibration "linearizes" the output of the red, green, and blue color channels, so that at any level of gray from 0-255 (8-bit scale), the color balance will be perfect.
**Profiling "equates" the visual characteristics of any given device to a set of universal standards. That is what enables me to see essentially the same color on my monitor that I would see on yours, or the prints you or your lab makes to match your monitor. In the printer world, every combination of paper, ink, and printer model requires a different profile. If you use, for example, Epson inks, plus Canson, Magic, Red River, Hahnemuhle, Harmon Galerie, Moab, Canon, and HP papers, then you need profiles installed for all of them, and you need to choose the correct profile for the combination in use.
It really isn't complicated to get it working right, but it does require some disciplined attention to detail.