abc1234 wrote:
The other things are that all shots were in the same folder and did change lenses when the files went black.
By that, do you mean that the "good" images were taken with one lens, then you changed lenses, and the "black" images were all taken with that lens on the camera? If so, and given that you say the lens that gave the black images has worked fine before and after, I think you may be on to something in thinking perhaps you didn't get the lens mounted correctly. But -- you might also check all of the contacts, lenses and camera, to see if you can spot any that might be loose or worn.
Does anyone around here know how the metadata are recorded to the SD card? Is it based solely on the settings, and independent of what the camera actually did? Would a bad contact on the lens in question have caused it to stop down to its smallest aperture, or interfere with the shutter action?
It sure seems that, if the SD card is OK, the only way to get totally black frames is if the shutter didn't open at all. Could that happen with your camera even if the mirror flopped out of the way? If so, you might not have noticed any different sound or feel, but no light reached the sensor.
Based on your description, it doesn't sound like you were using flash, but if so, it could be a synchronization problem. And if the flash simply didn't fire, then (a) that should have shown up in the metadata, and (2) the images probably wouldn't be black, just majorly underexposed.
A LONG time ago I earned a few extra dollars in college photographing couples at fraternity and sorority events. I was justifiably paranoid that the 35mm film hadn't "caught" and wasn't advancing, so I got in the habit of constantly checking to be sure the rewind knob turned each time I cocked the shutter for the next shot. Fortunately, I never got hit with the dreaded blank film, but that old habit refuses to die, and something in me takes subconscious notes of little details that sometimes alert me to problems in time to correct them before it's too late.