Sean H (Page 3): I guess that the inference there is that Hannity's show is an insult to journalism. We'll see, since the election on his show he has been building a case for collusion...

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Kmgw9v wrote:

Chris gets excited and interrupts; but the show is not an insult to journalism.

I guess that the inference there is that Hannity's show is an insult to journalism. We'll see, since the election on his show he has been building a case for collusion at the FBI and the DOJ in regard to the investigation and exoneration of Hillary Clinton for the email scandal. He has also been trying to build a case that at the upper management level of the FBI there was collusion regarding the Trump/Russia collusion which included withholding pertinent information when securing and renewing the FISA warrant that has lead to the Mueller investigation.

You may be right, he may be pulling a grand hoax on his viewer and listenership, but hopefully we will soon know as we are awaiting soon to be released IG reports that look beyond McCabe, and interestingly today a several congressmen made criminal referrals on about a half dozen political players in the FBI, DOJ. Maybe something will happen, maybe you will be able to say without a doubt that Hannity is full of shit. But so far it does look like he got it right on both Comey and McCabe, both have lied under oath and both have been found to leak classified information. A month ago you would have labeled Hannity's reporting on this fake news, and now, you will continue to disrespect him even though it was the media that you consume that lead you astray through omission.

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

thom w wrote:

And you apparently have low reading comprehension ... (show quote)

Well, in this case you are correct, your post was not anti-Trump, I can't actually say were my wires got crossed, but I apologize for that. I will once again bring up the point I made regarding Hilary winning the primary, The primary was fixed and that is pretty well proven.

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

Blurryeyed wrote:

I guess that the inference there is that Hannity's... (show quote)

LoL, HANNITY is building a CASE???
He’s not even a journalist, let alone a lawyer!!!

The only thing he could build is his ego.
But hey, you gobble it all right down!!!
LoL, let’s see if Mueller buys any of his amateurish opinions of a case?!?! LoL
SS

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

phcaan wrote:

The primary was fixed and that is pretty well proven.

Who proved it, you...., maybe Hannity??
Hannity will get a Pulitzer for proving that one! Can crappy comedians even GET a Pulitzer??? LoL
I didn’t even know there was an investigation?
One thing’s for sure...., when Mueller is done, well know if the presidential was fixed!!! LoL
SS

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

SharpShooter wrote:

Who proved it, you...., maybe Hannity??
Hannity will get a Pulitzer for proving that one! Can crappy comedians even GET a Pulitzer??? LoL
I didn’t even know there was an investigation?
One thing’s for sure...., when Mueller is done, well know if the presidential was fixed!!! LoL
SS

If you truly never heard the charges of fixing the primary, well that is hard to believe, but here is a short piece from Salon.
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/30/10_ways_the_democratic_primary_has_been_rigged_from_the_start_partner/

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

phcaan wrote:

If you truly never heard the charges of fixing the primary, well that is hard to believe, but here is a short piece from Salon.
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/30/10_ways_the_democratic_primary_has_been_rigged_from_the_start_partner/

For a second there, I thought that was a prosecutor that was assigned to the case writing it!!!
I rest MY case!!!
So just how many shooters WERE on the grassy knoll!!!
That should be an EASY one for you?!!?

SS

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

SharpShooter wrote:

For a second there, I thought that was a prosecutor that was assigned to the case writing it!!!
I rest MY case!!!

SS

When one is so blinded by their agenda, there is no point in bringing any fact that does not agree with said agenda to their agenda. Good night.

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

phcaan wrote:

When one is so blinded by their agenda, there is no point in bringing any fact that does not agree with said agenda to their agenda. Good night.

Especially when you DON’T HAVE said facts!!! LoL
SS

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

SharpShooter wrote:

LoL, HANNITY is building a CASE???
He’s not even a journalist, let alone a lawyer!!!

The only thing he could build is his ego.
But hey, you gobble it all right down!!!
LoL, let’s see if Mueller buys any of his amateurish opinions of a case?!?! LoL
SS

Like I said, the IG is already proceeding on what he has been reporting and you have been denying, or did you somehow miss McCabe's firing? Now we have criminal referrals coming out of the House that must be at least answered.... We will see if names such as Strzok and Page come back into the news, if Comey will not have to answer for his leaking, if Hillary's exoneration is again addressed. If these things happen I will be said that it is you who gobbles down the fake news, Russia collusion anyone, or how about obstruction... LOL

RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida

PinOakEO wrote:

I like Sean, listen to some of his daily radio program.

Only thing I don't like is his interruptions while others talk.

Otherwise he is doing a great job explaining complex situations with guests.

Have seen his nightly TV show a few times recently.

Why do you like him? What exactly do you identify with?

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

RixPix wrote:

Why do you like him? What exactly do you identify with?

I like him because he is not a progressive socialist democrat sellout that is nothing more than a drooling Obama mouthpiece.