Meuller V Trump
Apr 5, 2018 08:33:19 #
I'm WELL aware of that. But Donnie does have the power to fire Rosenstein and then get to Mueller. I've heard that sources say that he has already discussed that. He won't testify because he can't help himself from lying. It's compulsive. Just the other day he said that the US pays for 80% of NATO's budget. A LIE. It's 25% just SLIGHTLY off. I don't believe one damn word that comes out of his mouth. some president. I WILL say, however, that he has embarrassed some countries into paying up what they owe.
FrumCA wrote:
Only the DAG who appointed Mueller can fire him and then only for cause.
Apr 5, 2018 09:01:03 #
foathog wrote:
I'm WELL aware of that. But Donnie does have the ... (show quote)
US funding of NATO is only a lie because you want it to be. Why don't you check your facts (I know that's difficult) and just admit that Trump mischaracterized the amount and leave it at that?
Apr 5, 2018 09:28:39 #
thom w wrote:
Tell that to those who have already been convicted. Where do you get that there is no evidence of any crime? Have you been sitting in on Mueller's meetings?
Where do you get there is evidence of any crime? Have YOU been sitting in on Mueller's meetings?
Apr 5, 2018 10:06:20 #
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
FrumCA wrote:
It would be up to Twardlow to let us know. They would be knocking on his door...
Yeah, after they stop laughing thier asses off.
Apr 5, 2018 10:53:18 #
ole sarg
Loc: south florida
Trump like Clinton will be found guilty of obstructing justice. Impeachment is an act of Congress not the courts. Additionally crimes in the case of impeachment are not in the criminal code. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may be impeached and removed only for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors". The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order.
If the democrats take over the house there will probably be impeachment and the senate will not convict. Nevertheless, Trump will be castrated and his last 18 months in office will be as ineffectual as his previous 30 months.
If the democrats take over the house there will probably be impeachment and the senate will not convict. Nevertheless, Trump will be castrated and his last 18 months in office will be as ineffectual as his previous 30 months.
Apr 5, 2018 10:56:02 #
ole sarg
Loc: south florida
WNY you don't even know what Mueller was to investigate! You are a fool!
The deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, appointed former F.B.I. Director Robert S. Mueller III as the special counsel to oversee the investigation into Russian tampering in the 2016 presidential election. ..
The deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, appointed former F.B.I. Director Robert S. Mueller III as the special counsel to oversee the investigation into Russian tampering in the 2016 presidential election. ..
Apr 5, 2018 11:20:42 #
ole sarg wrote:
WNY you don't even know what Mueller was to investigate! You are a fool!
The deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, appointed former F.B.I. Director Robert S. Mueller III as the special counsel to oversee the investigation into Russian tampering in the 2016 presidential election. ..
The deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, appointed former F.B.I. Director Robert S. Mueller III as the special counsel to oversee the investigation into Russian tampering in the 2016 presidential election. ..
Period.
Apr 5, 2018 11:26:08 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
WNYShooter wrote:
LOL, I see he really nailed the one guy, 30 day sentence! LOLOL
The others, at least so far, have no relevance to any Trump/Russia collusion, which was the original point of the investigation.
Heck, more than half of his indictments are on people in Russia, so they have no effect or produce and substance, they were just pointless decoration.
The others, at least so far, have no relevance to any Trump/Russia collusion, which was the original point of the investigation.
Heck, more than half of his indictments are on people in Russia, so they have no effect or produce and substance, they were just pointless decoration.
I don't know much about the case you are referring to, but are you suggesting some sort of threshold below which Meuller should turn a blind eye?
Apr 5, 2018 11:31:36 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
boberic wrote:
I don't know this to be true but I will bet that if no charges are filed against Trump you will still maintain that he "colluded" with Russia. And that he is guilty and should be shot.
I try to stay current on what's going on in the attic, but if someone was suggesting that Trump be shot, I missed it. Don't you have to commit a capital crime in Utah, and then elect it, to get officially shot in this country?
Apr 5, 2018 11:34:05 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
WNYShooter wrote:
Sounds like veiled death threats on the POTUS to me; posting forwarded to the Secret Service.
If that was a threat it should be forwarded (as should thousands of other threats in the attic), but I have no idea how you came to that conclusion.
Apr 5, 2018 11:37:00 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Twardlow wrote:
Ha,Ha! This will be a new experience for me, though I expect the Secret Service will consider the source.
They must have a lot of experience with this sort of thing.
They must have a lot of experience with this sort of thing.
I'm sure they do. A woman I knew sent Johnson a letter saying she hoped he'd die. She was visited by the SS but nothing ever came of it. She was actually crazy, but she wasn't a threat to anyone.
Apr 5, 2018 11:39:37 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
WNYShooter wrote:
Excellent, it will make it easier for them to find and contain the threat. I will forward that info on, thanks.
I'm having trouble discerning whether that was a joke or you are an assbite.
Apr 5, 2018 11:40:04 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
FrumCA wrote:
It would be up to Twardlow to let us know. They would be knocking on his door...
Or not.
Apr 5, 2018 11:44:00 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
FrumCA wrote:
US funding of NATO is only a lie because you want it to be. Why don't you check your facts (I know that's difficult) and just admit that Trump mischaracterized the amount and leave it at that?
Why is it OK with you for the President of the United States to mischaracterize things?
Apr 5, 2018 11:45:50 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
papakatz45 wrote:
Where do you get there is evidence of any crime? Have YOU been sitting in on Mueller's meetings?
No crime, no convictions, seems pretty straight forward.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.