Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Hood vs. filter to protect lenses
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
Mar 3, 2018 00:48:19   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
JDubsy wrote:
Hi all! Anybody have any thoughts on the best way to protect camera lenses? I’m traveling to Germany in the fall and getting some new lenses for the trip. One person at the local camera shop said I definitely need UV filters to protect the lenses. Another person said that hoods were the only way to go! Help!


Lens caps!!!
SS

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 01:34:40   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Joe Blow wrote:
Oh, definitely chunky peanut better.

No, you obviously don't have dentures. Creamy only, but ND or polarized?

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 03:48:07   #
Pablo8 Loc: Nottingham UK.
 
Get the Sigma ceramic clear filters, and use a dedicated lens hood. Your lenses deserve the best.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2018 05:37:14   #
queencitysanta Loc: Charlotte, North Carolina
 
I use both.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 05:53:46   #
Wanderer2 Loc: Colorado Rocky Mountains
 
JDubsy wrote:
Hi all! Anybody have any thoughts on the best way to protect camera lenses? I’m traveling to Germany in the fall and getting some new lenses for the trip. One person at the local camera shop said I definitely need UV filters to protect the lenses. Another person said that hoods were the only way to go! Help!


I use a short as possible metal hood (about 1 inch) on each lens with a lens cap on the hood. The only drawbacks for me are the extra space being taken up in the camera bag and sometimes there is difficulty in getting the lens caps to stay attached. I started using this method after having some damage occur despite a filter. It's an inexpensive method and works for me.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 06:25:50   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
JDubsy wrote:
Hi all! Anybody have any thoughts on the best way to protect camera lenses? I’m traveling to Germany in the fall and getting some new lenses for the trip. One person at the local camera shop said I definitely need UV filters to protect the lenses. Another person said that hoods were the only way to go! Help!


You will find three camps here. The UV camp and the Lens Hood Only camp. Then there is the Filter and Hood together camp.
And, just like camping, you get to pick which camp you want to be with. All campers have good reasons for being in their camp.
I used to be in the filter and hood camp. But for the past 25 years, 15 years being a professional photographer, I am firmly in the Hood only camp. Why? That's a good question. I guess I just don't want anything extra between my lens glass and the sensor that might effect IQ ( image quality) I have traveled the world with my equipment and have never suffered a fatality yet. And why do you ask? Because my lens hood protects the lens BETTER than a PROTECTIVE filter, and the newer lens hoods from Nikon are a good example. The new version of the Nikon 70-200 2.8 and the Nikon 16-80 both have these hoods attached. They have a spring loaded feel. If the lens is dropped, the hood absorbs the shock and stays intact protecting the lens and filter threads. I tend to be a purist when it comes to photography. My belief is that if lens manufactures intended the photographer to use a PROTECTIVE filter they would supply one with the lens, they already supply a lens cap and rear lens cap, so why not a filter? My guess is that they even feel the PROTECTIVE filter degrades the final image in some way. So, for me anyway, I will remain a permanent resident of the hood only camp. Also newer lenses are being coated on the front element with a coating that allows years of cleaning with no ill effects. Even without this protection I have never damaged the surface of a lens cleaning it so, no problems. Enjoy and keep on shooting until the end.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 06:36:37   #
Pablo8 Loc: Nottingham UK.
 
I read, years ago, that a Nikon lens (might have been a 300mm f/2.8) had a plain glass front element. The front glass on my 300mm f/2.8 is coated, but I'm not sure whether it is plain, or optical glass.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2018 07:05:25   #
ken glanzer
 
With any filter check where it focuses. It may be slightly different but still in focus. In rifle scopes with a variable parallax adjustment (usually starting at 10X power & above), any piece of glass on the lens will require a parallax re-adjustment. There is no perfect glass.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 07:27:23   #
hj Loc: Florida
 
I do too.

crazydaddio wrote:
I use both.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 07:45:46   #
Shoeless_Photographer Loc: Lexington
 
JDubsy wrote:
Hi all! Anybody have any thoughts on the best way to protect camera lenses? I’m traveling to Germany in the fall and getting some new lenses for the trip. One person at the local camera shop said I definitely need UV filters to protect the lenses. Another person said that hoods were the only way to go! Help!



Unless you want to spend a bundle on a good filter to minimize image degradation, I'd stick with the lens hood. The hood will also keep out stray light, which can cause flaring and reduce contrast.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 07:50:09   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
The best way to protect lenses is to care for them. Do not waste your money, be careful when you use your lenses and use the lens hood.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2018 07:55:00   #
SonyBug
 
If you really want to protect the lens, leave it home in the safe. And to really, really protect it, be sure it is a fireproof safe.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 08:25:21   #
bobmcculloch Loc: NYC, NY
 
Architect1776 wrote:
I use both.
Here you will get both sides.
There are the filter haters who swear that a filter will do nothing to protect your lens.
From personal experience I have had a filter shattered and saved my lens from any damage and am so glad I had it on my lens. Another time I did not have a filter on and the lens front element was damaged. Add to this that I always use a hood that helps protect the lens and the filter attachment ring. But I had both on the two occasions mentioned.
I primarily use the hood for the purpose it was designed for and that is to shade the front element of the lens to the greatest extent possible depending on the relationship of the light source to the lens.
I still have and use the cracked hood I have for my 24-105 lens. I just gorilla glued it back together after it saved my lens.
You decide what is your lens worth and how much risk you want to take. I don't baby my stuff like many do here but don't abuse it either.
I use both. br Here you will get both sides. br Th... (show quote)


agreed, I'd add , I use a hood indoors if I'm in a crowed location, keeps other peoples junk off my lens , Bob.

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 08:45:26   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
i use both, but there are rare times when neither really fit the bill.
--Bob
JDubsy wrote:
Hi all! Anybody have any thoughts on the best way to protect camera lenses? I’m traveling to Germany in the fall and getting some new lenses for the trip. One person at the local camera shop said I definitely need UV filters to protect the lenses. Another person said that hoods were the only way to go! Help!

Reply
Mar 3, 2018 08:47:53   #
gwilliams6
 
Architect1776 wrote:
I use both.
Here you will get both sides.
There are the filter haters who swear that a filter will do nothing to protect your lens.
From personal experience I have had a filter shattered and saved my lens from any damage and am so glad I had it on my lens. Another time I did not have a filter on and the lens front element was damaged. Add to this that I always use a hood that helps protect the lens and the filter attachment ring. But I had both on the two occasions mentioned.
I primarily use the hood for the purpose it was designed for and that is to shade the front element of the lens to the greatest extent possible depending on the relationship of the light source to the lens.
I still have and use the cracked hood I have for my 24-105 lens. I just gorilla glued it back together after it saved my lens.
You decide what is your lens worth and how much risk you want to take. I don't baby my stuff like many do here but don't abuse it either.
I use both. br Here you will get both sides. br Th... (show quote)


I totally agree here with Architect, use both. I have traveled the world on assignment for over forty years, and travel also for fun ,and always use both. The filter has saved my lens from dust, sand, water and flying debris. The hood cuts down on unwanted flare in my images on sunny days. Ignore those "experts" who say you don't need the UV or clear filter for lens protection. Would you rather replace a broken filter, or replace your shattered lens after an unexpected impact. Your choice here. Cheers

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.