Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Paul Simon.... Kodachrome
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Dec 28, 2017 16:03:25   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
Rongnongno wrote:
You are correct I used the wrong time... The detail is at 2:42, my apologies.


So many versions come up but I think I found the one you mean.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4ltLp30KVs
Cigarette advertisement with Ronald Reagan from his acting days as the endorser.

You are aware that many who worked in commercials and advertisements did it as just part of the job, for pay, it was what they did for a living. Reagan probably did smoke, most did in those days. Maybe even that brand. But that brand was paying for a model to advertise their product and he took the job.

I remember reading about one star who said that before becoming successful he had done a commercial for a brand of a food product that he did not even like to eat, no matter what brand. His rent and utilities were due, he was offered a paying job, he did it, collected the pay, paid his bills and went looking for more work for next month's bills (and of course "the big break").

Reply
Dec 28, 2017 16:39:14   #
ricardo7 Loc: Washington, DC - Santiago, Chile
 
Rongnongno wrote:
You are correct I used the wrong time... The detail is at 2:42, my apologies.


Very funny. Forgot he had done those commercials.

Reply
Dec 28, 2017 17:29:45   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Rongnongno wrote:
You are correct I used the wrong time... The detail is at 2:42, my apologies.


Got it. RR in person

Reply
 
 
Dec 28, 2017 17:40:42   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I've got about a dozen of those. Always looking for more.
--Bob
peterg wrote:
Same. I had heavy-duty reusable cassettes for my Nikon. I also worked in a processing lab. We loaded Kodak Plus-X from 1000 ft rolls into Ansco cassettes. They were used by Bell Telephone's automatic cameras to take pictures of meters that measured phone trunk traffic. We also developed their film and repaired their cameras. Could overhaul a shutter with all new parts in about six minutes.

Reply
Dec 28, 2017 18:26:16   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
wmurnahan wrote:
He also changed the words when everyone started colorizing B&W, from everything looks worse in B&W to everything looks better in B&W.


Colorizing black & White movies is the biggest aesthetic travesty in cinematic history (other than "Plan 9 from Outer Space").
Not only is colorizing an awful idea, but the color always looks like sh*t. You can spot them in an instant. >Alan

Reply
Dec 28, 2017 19:24:48   #
JDspartan48
 
And I thought that I was the lone wacko who kept little odd's & end's of fasteners in them, whew...You made my day :)

Reply
Dec 28, 2017 19:57:50   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
robertjerl wrote:
The article I read was quoting some larger data set and didn't go into details.
The cell phones are taking the place of the small low end point and shots. Some of the high end cell phones are probably cutting into mid range, esp fixed lens cameras with people who just want a picture - no need or desire for high IQ images. A certain % of those people will start to get the bug for more versatility and higher IQ images and move up to good quality fixed lens, mirrorless and dslr interchangeable lens cameras etc. And of course there will always be a % who want high IQ and versatility from the beginning. As to upgrades, the tech keeps changing, often in big improvements but when the improvements get to be small increments, like with most computer gear, people will start to stick with the gear they have for a long time, not seeing any need to upgrade as long as their gear works and gives them acceptable IQ.
A mature market, then the camera companies will have to go through a major adjustment in the way they do business, how many models they offer etc. If anyone comes out with an affordable camera body that can have parts upgraded like tower computers then a larger % of people will go for that (I assume high end) body and upgrade instead of getting a whole new camera. Esp if it is in the realm of newer sensors and controlling software. In the film days the cameras pretty much kept working for many years and you added newer lenses while just starting to use the new improved films in the same camera for many years. My Miranda Sensorex was purchased in late 67 or early 68 on R&R in Tokyo (I forget which) and I continued using it, plus a second body obtained in the early 70s and an Olympus body adapted to use on a telescope until I went digital around 2000, they are stored and still work if I ever get the bug to try film again.
The article I read was quoting some larger data se... (show quote)


My take is the group that is in 25-35 range has a desire to own DSLR's they and their counterparts don't care if the blue is not blue enough or the there is another. problem. You had a desire to possess various cameras and move forward in the photography field. I don't believe that is their desire. They will be just as happy with instant gratification that cell phones deliver on.

Reply
 
 
Dec 28, 2017 22:04:36   #
chcollinsjr
 
Back in the film days, mid-50s to 80s, I used Agfa Isopan (ASA 25) for B&W portraits, Isopan (ASA 1600) for night shots in available light, and Ektachrome, Kodacolor, Ektacolor, and Agfachrome of various ASA ratings for color work. Now, with digital, I can change ISO (nee ASA) between frames rather than between rolls, something of a mixed blessing since I still haven't mastered Luminar, but I hope I'll get it before the cancer gets me!

Reply
Dec 28, 2017 22:34:13   #
Bar Loc: da 'YouPee', eh!
 
For the better part of 50 yrs I've used them for, um, more important things and still do and my supply is getting low...
NJFrank wrote:
Ah yes I remember those days. I still use those canisters to store nuts and bolts etc.

Reply
Dec 28, 2017 23:01:15   #
Chico 1948 Loc: Cincinnati
 
I used the canisters for plant material. Worked really well.

Reply
Dec 29, 2017 00:04:18   #
Bar Loc: da 'YouPee', eh!
 
I took my first digital picture at ISO 6400 and was astounded just what today's cameras can do, cripes I have a big catch up from my Minolta Maxxim 7000
chcollinsjr wrote:
Back in the film days, mid-50s to 80s, I used Agfa Isopan (ASA 25) for B&W portraits, Isopan (ASA 1600) for night shots in available light, and Ektachrome, Kodacolor, Ektacolor, and Agfachrome of various ASA ratings for color work. Now, with digital, I can change ISO (nee ASA) between frames rather than between rolls, something of a mixed blessing since I still haven't mastered Luminar, but I hope I'll get it before the cancer gets me!

Reply
 
 
Dec 29, 2017 00:53:42   #
Fotomacher Loc: Toronto
 
wmurnahan wrote:
He also changed the words when everyone started colorizing B&W, from everything looks worse in B&W to everything looks better in B&W.


You’re all a bunch of wankers. It NEVER made sense to be that the lyric was changed for the live concert (in Central Park). The song is Kodachrome for gawd sakes. Colour! Of course everything looks worse in black and white. My first SLR was a Pentax (1976) but my second was a Nikon and all my DSLRs have been Nikons. I have been a Paul Simon fan since he and Art were known as “Tom & Jerry” and cried when they split in 1964 after “Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.” sold poorly. I loved the “Paul Simon Songbook” recorded solo in London in 1965 and rejoiced when they re-grouped and gained success as Simon & Garfunkel through the late 1960’s. If you want to have some fun, listen to “Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.” and then “Somewhere They Can’t Find Me” recorded in 1966 and released on the “Sounds of Silence” LP.

Reply
Dec 29, 2017 01:06:46   #
skywolf
 
The song influenced my decision to go with a Nikon (first was a Nikkormat FTN) over a Canon. I liked the way the Nikkormat felt in my hand and was 90% sure of going that way, but the song put me over the edge. I got to photograph Paul Simon with that camera, for a college music newspaper.

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 00:47:40   #
nikon_jon Loc: Northeast Arkansas
 
Years ago I read an article that said the song was inspired by Kodak's announcement in the early 70's that they were going to discontinue production of Kodachrome. It was an EPA nightmare for Kodak. There were some very hazardous chemicals needed for the process, I think including cyanide. It was a favorite for big-pic magazines including Time, Look, Life, and Nat Geo. They and the photogs were in an uproar over the possibility of losing this marvelous film. Paul Simon picked up the ball and ran with it with the song. There was such an outcry that the "Great Yellow Father" decided to keep in in production.

Part of the appeal was the nature of the film, which was developed by two chamber musicians who were friends. Their names were Leopold Mannes and Leopold Godowski and they had an interest in photography. The story has it that they timed their processes by humming certain classical pieces they were accustomed to playing together and they knew exactly how long a certain piece of music should run. The nature of the film that I was talking about is that is was a non-substantive film which gave it a much higher resolution.

As they progressed, they reached a point where they needed more complex lab facilities and made an agreement with Kodak to use their research facilities and the help of their chemical engineers. Never have read how much they were compensated by Kodak for the results of their work. After it all, Mannes went back to his chamber music and Godowski went into working with the development of color television.

It is a great song and I still listen to it whenever I get the opportunity. "Mama, don't take my Kodachrome away".

Reply
Dec 31, 2017 07:36:38   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Fotomacher wrote:
You’re all a bunch of wankers. It NEVER made sense to be that the lyric was changed for the live concert (in Central Park). The song is Kodachrome for gawd sakes. Colour! Of course everything looks worse in black and white. My first SLR was a Pentax (1976) but my second was a Nikon and all my DSLRs have been Nikons. I have been a Paul Simon fan since he and Art were known as “Tom & Jerry” and cried when they split in 1964 after “Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.” sold poorly. I loved the “Paul Simon Songbook” recorded solo in London in 1965 and rejoiced when they re-grouped and gained success as Simon & Garfunkel through the late 1960’s. If you want to have some fun, listen to “Wednesday Morning, 3 A.M.” and then “Somewhere They Can’t Find Me” recorded in 1966 and released on the “Sounds of Silence” LP.
You’re all a bunch of wankers. It NEVER made sens... (show quote)


One of my favorites was "American Tune".

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.