Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
If anyone obstructed justice, it was Comey's FBI
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Dec 6, 2017 19:50:22   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
DaveO wrote:
Yes, but I could not find it in the Constitution. Some specially anointed group is in charge of that.


Only to those who dare read it for themselves.

Reply
Dec 6, 2017 19:50:40   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
BigBear wrote:
If you don't read it and understand it for yourself as opposed to relying on someone else to tell you what it says, it is of no value to you.


It means what a court says it means. You can tell a judge (or justice) they are wrong if you wish to but it is unlikely to work well for you.

I think reading it is a good idea, but if the court disagrees with you, the court pulls rank. Many people have benefited from the constitution without having personally read it.

Reply
Dec 6, 2017 20:03:53   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
thom w wrote:
It means what a court says it means. You can tell a judge (or justice) they are wrong if you wish to but it is unlikely to work well for you.

I think reading it is a good idea, but if the court disagrees with you, the court pulls rank. Many people have benefited from the constitution without having personally read it.


You enjoy being self righteous 'eh.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2017 00:24:33   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
BigBear wrote:
You enjoy being self righteous 'eh.


I would love to have something to be self righteous about. I still wouldn't want to be self righteous, but it would be nice to have a right to be. No, I'm not self righteous, you read me wrong.

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 07:02:46   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
BigBear wrote:
The Constitution is the law that mandates how things are supposed to be.


You continue to answer my simple and direct questions with bs evasiveness while playing the Constitutional scholar. Have a nice day while wallowing in your insecurities.

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 07:05:39   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
BigBear wrote:
Only to those who dare read it for themselves.


Nonsensical answer. Gee, another surprise.

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 07:08:53   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
drainbamage wrote:
Your comment makes a lot of sense, and shows that you are a thinking man who looks at both sides and sees that nothing is perfect on either side. That is called being "well-rounded". Thank you for giving pause for thought.

I have a question for you, and have been wondering how the administration would handle it: If Trump's administration comes up with some form of amnesty for the illegal immigrants that are already here and have been for years (since childhood, etc.), what about the folks that are trying to come to the US legally who are doing it the right way? Should they still have to wait? What would be your thoughts on solving their obvious outrage when they see they didn't have to bother going through the time and expense of entering the US legally?
Your comment makes a lot of sense, and shows that ... (show quote)


LOL, yeah, many of you guys are such well rounded thinking men.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2017 09:19:38   #
hondo812 Loc: Massachusetts
 
SteveR wrote:
All I can say is that we must put together a comprehensive immigration plan to begin now and require legal immigration beginning now. Because this was not done consistently over the past 30-50 years, that problem must be handled separately and with compassion, while weeding out individuals who are deportable. Others should be allowed to live out the lives that they have built. DACA, ofc, will be addressed. There are two extremes....let them all stay and deport them all. I believe that the correct path lies somewhere in between.
All I can say is that we must put together a compr... (show quote)



Reagan gave the millions of illegals at the time amnesty and Congress was supposed to exert control on the borders. How's that old saying go?

Fool me once, shame on you...fool me twice, shame on me.

Ship the f_ckers back!

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 09:28:50   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
hondo812 wrote:
Reagan gave the millions of illegals at the time amnesty and Congress was supposed to exert control on the borders. How's that old saying go?

Fool me once, shame on you...fool me twice, shame on me.

Ship the f_ckers back!


I keep wondering how an American would fair if they were to enter another country illegally.
We see what happens when some of them act stupidly while there legally.

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 09:37:30   #
hondo812 Loc: Massachusetts
 
BigBear wrote:
I keep wondering how an American would fair if they were to enter another country illegally.
We see what happens when some of them act stupidly while there legally.


Tell those antifa or BLM types to try to sneak into North Korea.....

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 09:40:39   #
JeffL Loc: New Jersey
 
skylane5sp wrote:
Fight? Not at all. You, however, are just not interested in the truth.


Just my two cents worth (and some of you will say it’s overvalued). There are facts and there is truth. Facts are what happened, was said or what was observed. Truth is a person’s interpretation of the facts, guided by their own belief set. This is very apparent when it comes to political orientation. Word of caution: Don’t believe everything you read or see from the media. Different sites or publications have their own biases. MSNBC and Fox News would never be characterized as unbiased. And, both interpret the facts to draw their own distorted “truths”.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2017 10:10:29   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
SteveR wrote:
I don't expect any. Instead of a response to the article I just get labeled a fanatic. How dare I point out the questionable integrity of the current investigators? However, any objective minded person would be concerned. Does objectivity make one a fanatic? Apparently to those so subjective that they would overlook such bias to further there own purposes.

BTW.....Where is George Will when we need him?


Steve,

Never, I repeat NEVER, confuse the emotional progressives with data! It only confuses them and makes them grouchy!

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 10:14:50   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
SteveR wrote:
Oh, I am a Republican. I hold to traditional Republican values. A continuation of liberalism under Hillary scared the heck out of me, so Trump's victory has, in a sense, been a two edged sword. Liberalism does not rule, at the moment. Republican values within Cabinet departments has already had a significant effect upon the economy. The passing of the tax bill, esp. with the lowering of the corporate tax rate should have a continued affect on the economy. The change in the judiciary is certainly welcome. Things that bother me, however are things like the moving of the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. My feeling.....why stoke the fires when it's not necessary. On immigration I agree with Trump about closing the borders and controlling immigration. What I don't agree on and find fundamentally loathsome is not having a cohesive plan to deal with the 11 million illegal immigrant in this country before deporting any and all of them. My feeling is that not all 11 million can or should be deported and Congress should make decisions, beginning with DACA, before wholesale deportations begin.
While it is true that any undocumented immigrant is here illegally, but failing to enforce immigration laws to the fullest in the past, some individuals have built lives and families in this country over a period of decades. There is a lot to be considered when constructing legislation about who should be allowed to stay and who should go.
Oh, I am a Republican. I hold to traditional Repu... (show quote)




The move to Jerusalem just meshes the will of the American Congress, bipartisan voting, under both presidents Clinton and Trump. Whether or not it stokes the fires, it’s pretty clear the status quo of ignoring the congressional vote has not worked!

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 10:16:27   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
thom w wrote:
I was pretty sure you were a Republican. You asked where George Will is and I told you. He quit the party over Trump and what is going on now.


Actually you are wrong.....he quit when Trump was nominated, not over any enacted policies.

Try to stay up!

Reply
Dec 7, 2017 10:17:49   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
hondo812 wrote:
Transferred?

He was dismissed you ignorant dolt!

CNN's headline...
FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey's description of Clinton to 'extremely careless'.

This man was in the tank for the queen of cankles. Lets her go and crucifies Flynn for doing his job AFTER Trump was elected. You can't COLLUDE to be elected AFTER you are already elected.

Mueller's team is on a witch hunt.



Hondo,

I think he was technically transferred to Human Resources (with the hope he resigns).

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.