If anyone obstructed justice, it was Comey's FBI
Dec 6, 2017 00:37:56 #
Dec 6, 2017 07:18:14 #
Dec 6, 2017 07:48:49 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
SteveR wrote:
http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/05/if-anyone-obstructed-justice-it-was-james-comeys-fbi/
I actually had you pegged as not a real fanatic. I guess I must reevaluate.
Dec 6, 2017 11:32:17 #
thom w wrote:
I actually had you pegged as not a real fanatic. I guess I must reevaluate.
Pull your head out of your ass, Thom. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Flynn 'lied' to the FBI about talking on the phone to the Russian Ambassador (which BTW was not anything illegal) and got bent over. What FBI agent conducted that interview?
Mills and Abedin lied to the FBI about an unsecured server containing classified information and NOTHING HAPPENED. What FBI agent conducted those interviews?
When Hillary was interviewed by the FBI regarding her mishandling of classified information (a serious felony) she was NOT PLACED UNDER OATH. What FBI agent conducted that interview?
When Comey crafted his exoneration of Hillary BEFORE any witnesses were even interviewed (Really?) the specific legal term 'Gross Negligence' was changed to the nothing phrase 'extreme carelessness'. What FBI agent made that correction?
FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok.
Dec 6, 2017 11:41:27 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
skylane5sp wrote:
Pull your head out of your ass, Thom. Wake up and ... (show quote)
I'm glad I don't wear your special glasses.
Dec 6, 2017 12:14:58 #
thom w wrote:
I'm glad I don't wear your special glasses.
You're *special* in ways we don't want to know ...
Dec 6, 2017 12:29:58 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
BigBear wrote:
You're *special* in ways we don't want to know ...
Shouldn't you be off advising the supreme court or something?
Dec 6, 2017 13:09:51 #
thom w wrote:
I actually had you pegged as not a real fanatic. I guess I must reevaluate.
Dec 6, 2017 13:54:34 #
thom w wrote:
I'm glad I don't wear your special glasses.
So nothing of any substance or rebuttal, just a stupid remark?
Dec 6, 2017 14:05:16 #
skylane5sp wrote:
So nothing of any substance or rebuttal, just a stupid remark?
An excellent rebuttal that you apparently do not understand, but that comes as no surprise!
Dec 6, 2017 14:07:14 #
skylane5sp wrote:
So nothing of any substance or rebuttal, just a stupid remark?
I don't expect any. Instead of a response to the article I just get labeled a fanatic. How dare I point out the questionable integrity of the current investigators? However, any objective minded person would be concerned. Does objectivity make one a fanatic? Apparently to those so subjective that they would overlook such bias to further there own purposes.
BTW.....Where is George Will when we need him?
Dec 6, 2017 14:12:23 #
SteveR wrote:
I don't expect any. Instead of a response to the article I just get labeled a fanatic. How dare I point out the questionable integrity of the current investigators? However, any objective minded person would be concerned. Does objectivity make one a fanatic? Apparently to those so subjective that they would overlook such bias to further there own purposes.
Face it, Steve, you're attitude has progressively changed and is quite apparent to at least some. I do not at all mean this in a bad way. As entertaining as this forum is, some participants at least appear to display views, both left and right, that are considered to be out of the ordinary of a supposedly rational person. Enjoy........
Dec 6, 2017 14:56:49 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
skylane5sp wrote:
So nothing of any substance or rebuttal, just a stupid remark?
You are always spoiling for a fight, and I'm just not interested.
Dec 6, 2017 14:59:48 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
SteveR wrote:
I don't expect any. Instead of a response to the article I just get labeled a fanatic. How dare I point out the questionable integrity of the current investigators? However, any objective minded person would be concerned. Does objectivity make one a fanatic? Apparently to those so subjective that they would overlook such bias to further there own purposes.
BTW.....Where is George Will when we need him?
BTW.....Where is George Will when we need him?
He jumped ship several months ago. Is no longer a registered Republican. He isn't on your side on this one. He sees Trump as an existential threat. Apparently you haven't been keeping up.
Dec 6, 2017 15:05:40 #
thom w wrote:
You are always spoiling for a fight, and I'm just not interested.
Fight? Not at all. You, however, are just not interested in the truth.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.