Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What Filters are in Your Bag
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Sep 19, 2017 18:58:26   #
hassighedgehog Loc: Corona, CA
 
The only one, other than the protective filters on all lenses, it a circular polarizer.

Reply
Sep 19, 2017 18:58:44   #
hassighedgehog Loc: Corona, CA
 
The only one, other than the protective filters on all lenses, is a circular polarizer.

Reply
Sep 19, 2017 22:17:53   #
Photogirl17 Loc: Glenwood, Ark.
 
Nature_Shooter wrote:
With all of the advances in processing programs like PS and LR, what filters do you still carry with you and use and what filters have you stopped using?

I am scaling back to just polarizing and full neutral density. Any other thoughts?


I have a 10 stop ND, Polarizer, 4 magnification filters, and a spare UV.

Reply
 
 
Sep 19, 2017 23:57:38   #
Basil Loc: New Mexico
 
I have CPs and an ND n my bag, but all have a set of a couple dozen Coken effects filters of all sorts that I collected when I was in the military stationed over seas.

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 01:31:15   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
I use a #4 un bleached. Its just about right for a 12 oz cup. I like a dark roast with an espresso grind.

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 04:23:57   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
burkphoto wrote:
Circular Polarizer
Neutral Density 3, 5, and 7 f/stops (8X, 32X, 128X) (for outdoor videography, primarily)
UV (for high altitude work > 5000 feet)
Clear Glass (lens protection in harsh environments such as beach, welding, cooking, industrial processes)

I also have adapter rings to mount my 58mm filters on the 46mm filter ring of my macro lens. No point in owning two sets of filters.


Now that's when a clear glass filter makes sense. Although I don't use one for the beach, I sure would use one for the other three and anything else similar to those three. I know there are other UHHs that say a UV filter is not needed, but I live just south of the mile high city of Denver. Right now I only have a 55mm UV filter that I use on my lenses adapted for my E-M1mrII, but eventually I will purchase a 67mm and a 72mm UV filters. I know you are absolutely right that it is useful if not absolutely needed to improve one's images above 5000'.

Reply
Sep 20, 2017 10:08:37   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
wdross wrote:
Now that's when a clear glass filter makes sense. Although I don't use one for the beach, I sure would use one for the other three and anything else similar to those three. I know there are other UHHs that say a UV filter is not needed, but I live just south of the mile high city of Denver. Right now I only have a 55mm UV filter that I use on my lenses adapted for my E-M1mrII, but eventually I will purchase a 67mm and a 72mm UV filters. I know you are absolutely right that it is useful if not absolutely needed to improve one's images above 5000'.
Now that's when a clear glass filter makes sense. ... (show quote)


In general, I prefer lens shades/hoods to a filter-like device for lens protection. The UV does help at higher altitudes, but mostly for scenes with distant background elements.

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2017 02:40:46   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
burkphoto wrote:
In general, I prefer lens shades/hoods to a filter-like device for lens protection. The UV does help at higher altitudes, but mostly for scenes with distant background elements.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.