Tamron Lens
Aug 5, 2017 19:57:47 #
speters wrote:
You have it backwards! Its 60mm on a FF, but will give you the field of view of a 90mm on a APS-C body!
So if it is a 60mm lens has a field of view of 90mm would that not be on a FF camera the 90mm
I put a 400mm on a FF and then the same lens on apsc becomes a 640mm equivalent on that camera is that equivalent in relation to the FF camera? in other words you would need a 640mm lens on your FF to get the same view as the apsc got with the 400mm.
The OP is absolutely right the way they put it.
Aug 5, 2017 21:50:17 #
leftj wrote:
Don't see the word "equivalent" in his post. Words mean things.
The way you use them, words are mean things.
Aug 5, 2017 22:37:22 #
Aug 5, 2017 22:56:36 #
The use of a marker, such as "oh", should be followed by a comma. The omission of the comma could wreck countless trains.
Aug 6, 2017 02:03:09 #
leftj wrote:
You can't understand words that aren't there. Making assumptions about the meaning of poorly worded statements leads to massive mis-communication.
What massive miscommunication? Everyone clearly knows what was meant. That's all that really matters.
Aug 6, 2017 06:29:18 #
leftj
Loc: Texas
rook2c4 wrote:
What massive miscommunication? Everyone clearly knows what was meant. That's all that really matters.
And yet, your rraction to my statement shows an out of context interpretation. Reading comprehension is also a problem.
Aug 6, 2017 07:11:58 #
leftj wrote:
And yet, your rraction to my statement shows an out of context interpretation. Reading comprehension is also a problem.
Now we have a real dilemma. A bunch of letters that don't spell anything. If we assume to know what the author means, trains could crash from coast to coast. I guess it's best to just ignore the statement and hope it all goes away.
--
Aug 6, 2017 07:31:06 #
leftj
Loc: Texas
Bill_de wrote:
Now we have a real dilemma. A bunch of letters that don't spell anything. If we assume to know what the author means, trains could crash from coast to coast. I guess it's best to just ignore the statement and hope it all goes away.
--
--
Yep, my bad. Typos do happen. Better to own up to it than to say everyone knew what I meant.
Aug 6, 2017 07:48:25 #
I have a old tamron 90mm, on a aps-c that would be the equiv. of 135mm. how would that work as a portrait lens?
Aug 6, 2017 08:16:20 #
Anyone with half a brain knew exactly what he meant, but there always has to be a nit picker who has to spoil his good feeling about his new lens.
Aug 6, 2017 08:20:55 #
Aug 6, 2017 08:21:44 #
Aug 6, 2017 08:27:49 #
leftj
Loc: Texas
Leon S wrote:
What I want to know is when that train was crashing, where was Al Gore?
Reviewing his utility bills on his energy guzzeling home.
Aug 6, 2017 08:59:55 #
Seems as if FF and Dx cameras create different lengths because of the the actual camera.
You will often see the different ratings or measurements when lens are sold and can be used on different cameras.
I dont know why it just has always been a factor in the industry. On one camera you might see that a 18 to 200 will act more like 25 to 240 and things like that.
You will often see the different ratings or measurements when lens are sold and can be used on different cameras.
I dont know why it just has always been a factor in the industry. On one camera you might see that a 18 to 200 will act more like 25 to 240 and things like that.
Aug 6, 2017 09:01:32 #
I used to use tamrons and sigmas. I went back to Nikor but lately the Tamrons have held there own and at a great savings.
16-300 is shart fast and saved me about 600.00
16-300 is shart fast and saved me about 600.00
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.