Nikon D750 or D810? (Page 4): I know what d810 can produce I have one I was try to show the op . that a single frame image properly shot at 14 bit raw can produce a finished product...

nikonbrain Loc: Crystal River Florida

therwol wrote:

If you want to share multiple large files, post a ... (show quote)

I know what d810 can produce I have one I was try to show the op . that a single frame image properly shot at 14 bit raw can produce a finished product that is close to an HDRI without multiple files this is not the first thing I have posted here. I wasn't concerned about detail....

therwol Loc: USA

nikonbrain wrote:

I know what d810 can produce I have one I was try to show the op . that a single frame image properly shot at 14 bit raw can produce a finished product is close to an HDRI without multiple files this not the first thing I have posted here. I wasn't concerned about detail....

Okay, understood. The point actually was to show how to share multiple large files at once, something that wasn't working for you tonight, and you pretty much have to do it with a link to external storage. I don't claim my pictures are especially great, just some vacation pictures, but they total approximately 300 megabytes, and there is no way I could share them here without a link or cutting them down in size considerably.

nikonbrain Loc: Crystal River Florida

O.k.is that what every one that is putting up multiple images doing. All this social media is New to Me . each site has different parameters. Redbubble used to be 100 mb and pngs.tiffs something I am more comfortable around I just don't shoot jpegs or produce them unless to post and keep them in separate folders.....

therwol Loc: USA

nikonbrain wrote:

O.k.is that what every one that is putting up multiple images doing. All this social media is New to Me . each site has different parameters. Redbubble used to be 100 mb and pngs.tiffs something I am more comfortable around I just don't shoot jpegs or produce them unless to post and keep them in separate folders.....

I wouldn't say that everyone on this site is doing that. You do see multiple pictures in posts. I think you may be running into a total size restriction. You can try again from your computer just to see if it works.

In many discussions, people have discussed external storage, and there are many options, more than I can remember. I do know that a free Google Drive is 15 gigs. A Microsoft Office One Drive is smaller unless you have a subscription to Office 365 on your computer, and then it's a whopping 1 terabyte. If you want to store a lot of pictures online, you might want to check out some of them with a Google search.

nikonbrain Loc: Crystal River Florida

I will make sure in the morning on the computer, but I believe both of these images have been reduced to under 10 mb 's each....thanks again I will try again in the morning if any one is still interested...This camera is said to have 14.8 stops of light at 64 iso. I am now doing my landscapes with one bracket in highlight weighted metering mode and 64 iso. Making 3 bracket exsposure 2 stops apart . No neutral density filters used they recover guite well with no noise...or very little .

Peteraa1

I feel the same way.

Peteraa1

Best digital camera.

At what price?

NASA uses Hasselblad cameras, but the price is beyond the average photographer's reach.

Just under $33,000.

BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA

Peteraa1 wrote:

Best digital camera.

At what price?

NASA uses Hasselblad cameras, but the price is beyond the average photographer's reach.

Just under $33,000.

New Hassy X1D available for less than $9000.

FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA

BobHartung wrote:

New Hassy X1D available for less than $9000.

A new Leica M9 with a lens will cost at least $10,000. Perhaps that's a bit on the low side.

Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.

BobHartung wrote:

New Hassy X1D available for less than $9000.

And (per reviews) it's not your fathers Hasselblad

BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA

Rich1939 wrote:

And (per reviews) it's not your fathers Hasselblad

You're right. It is very clean and weather resistant. No back to take off and crap up the sensor. It, like any new camera, takes getting used to and it is not for someone who wants one camera to try to do everything under the sun photographically. But it is a very nice, portable landscape camera.

Nukepr Loc: Citrus County, FL

Please stop hijacking this post. It is not about Hasselblad, or about the best camera. It is an honest question seeking the experience of others with two very specific Nikon cameras. Please respond to the original post or to others relevant to that post and do not stray off into irrelevant posts.

Peteraa1

You're right. It is very clean and weather resistant. No back to take off and crap up the sensor. It, like any new camera, takes getting used to and it is not for someone who wants one camera to try to do everything under the sun photographically. But it is a very nice, portable landscape camera, here's another one.https://thedigitalcamera.net/full-frame-vs-aps-c-sensor-size-and-the-consequences-it-has-for-you/

BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA

Nukepr wrote:

Please stop hijacking this post. It is not about Hasselblad, or about the best camera. It is an honest question seeking the experience of others with two very specific Nikon cameras. Please respond to the original post or to others relevant to that post and do not stray off into irrelevant posts.

Reaction a little overboard eh? You don' tneed get your shorts in a knot!

Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.

Nukepr wrote:

Please stop hijacking this post. It is not about Hasselblad, or about the best camera. It is an honest question seeking the experience of others with two very specific Nikon cameras. Please respond to the original post or to others relevant to that post and do not stray off into irrelevant posts.

I guess I need to apologize for for approaching this thread in a manor like most of us do here. That is, as if it were a friendly conversation.