Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sigma vs Tamron 150-600 zoom.
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
May 23, 2017 11:08:56   #
PacingTheCage Loc: Austin, TX
 
Truth be known, many times I want something more than I need it!

Reply
May 23, 2017 11:51:50   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
PacingTheCage wrote:
Truth be known, many times I want something more than I need it!


I think thats true for everyone.

Reply
May 23, 2017 13:12:47   #
Mil
 
After considerable research and reading particularly reviews of the Tamron vs Sigma contemporary I purchased the contemporary and use it on my Nikon 7100. Have been quite pleased with the quality of the pictures. After a year still trying to better frame the shots but have gotten some very sharp pics at long distances. Have not tried or compared to the others, and am just startling to get more serious into photography particularly of nature - birds and animals so my knowledge is limited.

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2017 13:31:14   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
The question is what do you really want. Do you want the very best lens based upon objective measures of optical and mechanical quality and ease of use? Or do you want something that is acceptable? I rarely see anyone here testing and comparing lenses under carefully controlled conditions. They leave this to various websites and presume the differences they see and the recommendations they make are relevant to their own work. Dangerous.

I have learned that testing lenses carefully may lead to surprises. You might find out the newest is not always worth more that what you have currently.

Getting back to the original post, I have the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary and love it on my Canon 80D. Sure, better lenses might be out there but I am satisfied with this one and would rather take pictures of birds and flowers rather than of test patterns.

Reply
May 23, 2017 14:20:07   #
TonyReynolds Loc: Granville, OH
 
Here's a good article comparing the Sigma Contemporary versus the Sport model. https://www.deepgreenphotography.com/blogarchive/2016/5/fieldreview-sigma-150-600-mm I have the C model and love it.

Tony

Reply
May 23, 2017 15:17:28   #
jmcgloth Loc: Ocean Park, WA
 
Bultaco wrote:
Many of the lens post are opinions, their choice is always the best. I had a Tammy G1 + Nikor 200-500. I purchased the G2 a fews months ago, I've sold both the G1 and Nikon since. I seldon read lens manuels but I will in the furture, the G2 has two AF modes, after reading the manuel explaining the two AF modes I love it. This is my opinion based on shooting wildlife. The 100mm is a plus when shooting elk, moose, bears ect at a distance. Get the lens that best suits your subjects. Have fun!


"I seldom read lens manuels, but will in the furture." Horrible English.

Reply
May 23, 2017 15:23:41   #
rrayrob Loc: Las Vegas, NV
 
I have a Nikon d750 and just got the Tamron 150-600mm G2. Sold my Tamron 150-600 G1 as it was soft @ 500-600mm. Really like the new G2. Did research before buying the new lens and researched the Sigma and Nikon 200-500. The Tamron came out on top in most categories. Took it for a "maiden run" and here are some samples. All images were cropped in PP. If you are still undersided then I suggest you rent each lens you are considering buying to test them out. Hope this helps.

American Avocet @ 600mm 1/2500 sec @ f/8.0 ISO 800
American Avocet @ 600mm 1/2500 sec @ f/8.0 ISO 800...
(Download)

Geese @320mm 1/4000 sec @f/8.0 ISO 720
Geese @320mm 1/4000 sec @f/8.0 ISO 720...
(Download)

Grass @280mm 1/2500 sec @f/8.0 ISO 500
Grass @280mm 1/2500 sec @f/8.0 ISO 500...
(Download)

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2017 15:32:19   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
r.grossner wrote:
Looking for something to reach out about 600mm full frame but also a zoom. Any comments on which makes one better than the other will help my decision. Maybe the 200-500 Nikon is an option if I feel I don't need the extra 100mm reach. All three are about same price. Body is a D750. This lens will be used for wildlife and birding.


Note there are two of each Tamron and Sigma. The latest Tamron G2 seems to get most votes even when compared to the more expensive and weighty Sigma Sport.

But us Nikon people are wedded to the 200-500 Nikon. With D8xx cameras you can always crop to make up the extra 100 mm. The VR on the Nikon is awesome. I haven't seen it compared across the lenses.

You have 1/3 less pixels with a D750 but still can comfortably crop to 1/4 of the frame with good resolution....equivalent to a 2000mm when using the 500.

Reply
May 23, 2017 15:38:24   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
imagemeister wrote:
I really like the 200-500 - but, with a full frame body you WILL need the extra 100mm the others provide ! - Flip a coin ..... If you are serious, only look at the Tammy G2 or the Sigma Sport .....


Nonsense. The 200-500 is marvelous on D8xxs. It only takes cropping of 15% to get 600mm equivalent...i.e. 30ish MP.

Such statements without testing are meaningless.

Reply
May 23, 2017 15:44:31   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
Bultaco wrote:
Many of the lens post are opinions, their choice is always the best. I had a Tammy G1 + Nikor 200-500. I purchased the G2 a fews months ago, I've sold both the G1 and Nikon since. I seldon read lens manuels but I will in the furture, the G2 has two AF modes, after reading the manuel explaining the two AF modes I love it. This is my opinion based on shooting wildlife. The 100mm is a plus when shooting elk, moose, bears ect at a distance. Get the lens that best suits your subjects. Have fun!


The Nikon has two AF modes also. And two VR modes...three if you include off.

One interesting and surprising thing I found fussing around with an inferior lens (28-300) and Kenko 1.4 telextender the other day was that despite Kenko's advice to not use VR with the telextender it focused much quicker and more accurately with VR on.

Thus I'd like to see tests of the various lenses that include the effect of VR, OS, or whatever Tamron calls it.

Reply
May 23, 2017 17:14:19   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
The G2s are coming. The Tamron now has the 150-600mm, the 70-200mm f2.8, and soon to be the G2 version of the 24-70mm f2.8. All said to be better than their previous versions. And of course the 6 year warranty that comes along with them.

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2017 18:35:28   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
russelray wrote:
After reading a few billion articles about Tamron and Sigma's 150-600, the last article I was reading had an advertisement along the side from a local computer store that would rent the lenses at $120 for 7 days. So I rented the Tamron G2, Sigma Contemporary, and Sigma Sport.

I take handheld pictures only of wildlife and landscapes; tripods are for videos and then only if the video will be more than 10 seconds. My rental goal was to determine if I could lug these behemoths for eight hours around the San Diego Zoo (100 acres), San Diego Zoo Safari Park (1,800 acres), Ramona Grasslands (4,400 acres), and the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge (11,100 acres). I could. No problem.

The Sport is supposed to take visually sharper pictures than the Tamron or the Contemporary. With my handheld pictures, I did not detect that visual superiority.

The Sport is waterproof, but I live in San Diego where it rains very little, and I don't do underwater photography.

What did affect things came down again to living in San Diego. It's sunny and hot here, and the Sport, being made of all metal, got excessively hot. It didn't seem to affect any controls or functions, but it sure got uncomfortable when I went to use that metal zoom ring. The Sport, then, was out, especially when I considered its $1,999 price versus the Tamron's $1,399.

That left the G2 and the Contemporary. Ultimately, it came down to the zoom ring. I use a Canon Rebel XSi, Rebel T2i, and Rebel T6s, and I have used a Tamron 28-300 as my walkaround lens for the last 8 years. So I'm used to how it zooms, i.e., zoom ring rotates left to right, 150 to 600. The Contemporary zoom ring rotates right to left, 150 to 600. When I was out shooting birds in flight, rapid zooming with the Sigma was uncomfortable because I'm right-handed, supporting the camera with my right hand and the lens and zoom ring with my left hand. That position allows my left hand to very naturally use the Tamron zoom ring. With the Sigma, I had to give up support of the lens in order to move my left hand into a position to comfortably rotate the zoom ring. I almost dropped the camera a couple of times, and I lost a lot of potential BIF pictures.

I settled on the Tamron G2. An extraordinary lens.

This all is in addition to my immediately-after-rental-review and my buying decision here: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-458752-1.html
After reading a few billion articles about Tamron ... (show quote)


The above story is a perfect example of why choices such as these should be personal. While I choose the Sigma Sport, because it best suits what I wanted to do, the Tamron, for Russel, worked much better and therefore was a much better choice for him. There is no such thing as a universally correct answer. Personal choice and how a lens/camera feels/works in you hands is an important part of the decision . It's also part of why there are multiple choices. Best of luck.

Reply
May 23, 2017 18:56:10   #
Jim Bob
 
MtnMan wrote:
Note there are two of each Tamron and Sigma. The latest Tamron G2 seems to get most votes even when compared to the more expensive and weighty Sigma Sport.

But us Nikon people are wedded to the 200-500 Nikon. With D8xx cameras you can always crop to make up the extra 100 mm. The VR on the Nikon is awesome. I haven't seen it compared across the lenses.

You have 1/3 less pixels with a D750 but still can comfortably crop to 1/4 of the frame with good resolution....equivalent to a 2000mm when using the 500.
Note there are two of each Tamron and Sigma. The l... (show quote)

VR is the best I have ever used hands down.

Reply
May 23, 2017 18:59:51   #
Jim Bob
 
rrayrob wrote:
I have a Nikon d750 and just got the Tamron 150-600mm G2. Sold my Tamron 150-600 G1 as it was soft @ 500-600mm. Really like the new G2. Did research before buying the new lens and researched the Sigma and Nikon 200-500. The Tamron came out on top in most categories. Took it for a "maiden run" and here are some samples. All images were cropped in PP. If you are still undersided then I suggest you rent each lens you are considering buying to test them out. Hope this helps.


Not sure what reviews you reference and how you concluded the Tamron..."came out on top in most categories". Your post actually sounds more like buyer's justification rather than a fair lens comparison.

Reply
May 23, 2017 19:02:31   #
Jim Bob
 
cjc2 wrote:
The above story is a perfect example of why choices such as these should be personal. While I choose the Sigma Sport, because it best suits what I wanted to do, the Tamron, for Russel, worked much better and therefore was a much better choice for him. There is no such thing as a universally correct answer. Personal choice and how a lens/camera feels/works in you hands is an important part of the decision . It's also part of why there are multiple choices. Best of luck.

There is nothing wrong with "personal choice". But the fact is some lenses are just better than others. Many choose to purchase inferior lenses for personal reasons I suppose.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.