Nikon D7200 worth the upgrade?
Dec 11, 2016 07:34:57 #
I've had a D7100 since 2014. I love it. You say you take nature shots, if that includes animals, birds, insects - anything that moves, go for the D7200 because of the larger buffer. However, if it were me, I'd bite the bullet and go for the D500.
Michael
Michael
Dec 11, 2016 08:03:00 #
xman222 wrote:
"If it aint broke don't fix it" If the 7100 served you well, the only reason to go for the 7200 would be the greater buffer, but that's only if your shooting style requires it.
I LOVE the 7100 and my move would be to the D500, which is my dream camera. Then I would totally forego the full frame cameras.
I LOVE the 7100 and my move would be to the D500, which is my dream camera. Then I would totally forego the full frame cameras.
Xman, the op is now using a D3200 as his D7100 was destroyed and was replaced by a D3200. (I had to read his message twice before I figured it out). It would be a similar upgrade as the D3200 was a downgrade when he moved to the D3200.
Personally, I would relegate the D3200 to a backup camera or "donate" it to the wife/girlfriend, kids or whatever and get them involved in photography. I did this with my wife and it created mixed results. Now, I can semi-freely buy photography accessories, but, now she is wanting to go shoot sunrises, sunsets etc.
Dec 11, 2016 08:20:26 #
I own the D7200 and it is a very well-engineered camera, I sold my D7100 to KEH used the money for a Lens. The 7100 uses a Toshiba sensor and the 7200 uses a Sony made to Nikon specs.
Here are a couple of sites.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-d7200-vs-d7100
http://www.techradar.com/how-to/photography-video-capture/cameras/nikon-d7200-vs-d7100-8-key-differences-you-need-to-know-1320825
The 7200 has a newer computer the Expeed 4 as opposed to the Expeed 3 in the 7100.
I believe the sensor is the same as Sony 6000 series but performs better in the Nikon because of the Nikon Specs and the Nikon Expeed computer system.
Hope this helps.
Here are a couple of sites.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-d7200-vs-d7100
http://www.techradar.com/how-to/photography-video-capture/cameras/nikon-d7200-vs-d7100-8-key-differences-you-need-to-know-1320825
The 7200 has a newer computer the Expeed 4 as opposed to the Expeed 3 in the 7100.
I believe the sensor is the same as Sony 6000 series but performs better in the Nikon because of the Nikon Specs and the Nikon Expeed computer system.
Hope this helps.
Dec 11, 2016 08:41:05 #
Royce Moss wrote:
Hey Hoggers I need your expert opinions. Last year... (show quote)
Try a D5300. It takes same images as D7100 and has wifi.
Dec 11, 2016 08:46:09 #
MtnMan wrote:
Try a D5300. It takes same images as D7100 and has wifi.
Doesn't take the same as D7200.
Dec 11, 2016 08:46:35 #
Dec 11, 2016 09:01:58 #
I used to have a 7100 but got a case of gas and bought the 7200. The only real difference for my style shooting is the absence of banding at high iso settings. I don't see any difference at more 'normal' settings. I also have a D500. If you need to shoot at higher iso settings (inside dimly lit rooms with moving people) this camera is the way to go. It's ability to shoot cleanly at absurdly high iso settings is phenomenal. I still love my D7200, it is still my go to choice when I travel, but the D500 is in another class. If possible, try renting one. I think that if you do you will end up owning one
Dec 11, 2016 09:47:44 #
mas24
Loc: Southern CA
Yes, the D5300 has been quoted in photography articles, as having the same IQ as the D7100. Not bad.
Dec 11, 2016 09:57:50 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Royce Moss wrote:
Hey Hoggers I need your expert opinions. Last year... (show quote)
A D500 is an upgrade, a D7200 is not an upgrade.
Dec 11, 2016 09:58:19 #
mas24 wrote:
Yes, the D5300 has been quoted in photography articles, as having the same IQ as the D7100. Not bad.
But the D5300 does NOT have the same ability for shutter actuations. It is considered an "Amateur" camera by Nikon where the D7100/D7200 is considered a Pro/Am camera and has a heavier duty shutter. Its not important if you are just going to take a few snapshots on vacation and holidays but COULD be very important if you go out and shoot 50- 200 shots on a trip to a bird sanctuary, nature preserve etc. and do it daily, weekly, monthly like many of us in Florida, Georgia, Alabama, California, Texas and other places with a wide variety of shots, animals, birds and scenery do. For the 10 or 20 shots on a holiday, the 40 or 50 shots a day on a vacation etc. the entry level cameras are great get your feet wet and develop and interest cameras.
Dec 11, 2016 09:59:18 #
The D7200 has a bigger buffer, perhaps and not sure of it, a slightly faster firing rate.
D7200 bodies are a bargain refurb.
D7200 bodies are a bargain refurb.
Dec 11, 2016 11:47:46 #
Ok guess that's right to the point. Everybody is saying the 7200 is the way to go.
Dec 11, 2016 11:56:50 #
Royce Moss wrote:
Ok guess that's right to the point. Everybody is saying the 7200 is the way to go.
Dec 11, 2016 12:08:18 #
The D7100 was working for you and the 3200 doesn't measure up to all your needs the same way. The D7200 has a bigger buffer which for your sporting events you will appreciate. It should fit you like an old pair of jeans.
Dec 11, 2016 13:15:04 #
Royce Moss wrote:
Hey Hoggers I need your expert opinions. Last year... (show quote)
I own and luv my D7200. Great camera!
If you are already considering FX, how about the D750? You may need to upgrade your glass.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.