Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
david hamilton
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Nov 25, 2016 21:15:14   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
just heard that david hamilton is dead

Reply
Nov 25, 2016 21:29:23   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
oldtigger wrote:
just heard that david hamilton is dead


Yes, RIP. His books were very popular when I was at college and hanging out with friends at the local art school. Very dreamy images, typically of adolescent girls.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4sRTsMth6w . It was considered a time of innocence then, not sure it would be now unfortunately.


(Download)

Reply
Nov 25, 2016 22:08:44   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
Only one problem... He was under investigation for rape...

Reply
 
 
Nov 25, 2016 22:27:51   #
Dedo Loc: NY, Uruguay
 
Like Jock Sturges' photography, Hamilton's work is considered artistic and valid. Personally, I get a queasy feeling
thinking about grown men interested in taking pictures of naked young girls.

Reply
Nov 25, 2016 22:32:32   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Only one problem... He was under investigation for rape...


Yes I've just read that. Potentially another person that took advantage of his position, may have been a sexual predator, and may have committed suicide.

It is very troubling indeed to think about how many abusers may be still engaging in such behavior.

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 05:48:16   #
Billyspad Loc: The Philippines
 
Dedo wrote:
Like Jock Sturges' photography, Hamilton's work is considered artistic and valid. Personally, I get a queasy feeling
thinking about grown men interested in taking pictures of naked young girls.


If that makes you uncomfortable then please NEVER visit the nudey rudey forum here. A whole bunch of old pervs pretending they admire the lighting etc.
If you can live with the discomfort then take a look cos its the biggest larf for free you will ever get. Fat old boilers, covered in tats, starkers in the name of "art". Its a scream I assure you.

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 10:44:38   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
For me the dividing line is the ultimate motivation. If it were to capture the essence of youth in an artistic manner, I'm OK with that. If a photographer has ulterior motives, then I have an issue with that.
--Bob


Dedo wrote:
Like Jock Sturges' photography, Hamilton's work is considered artistic and valid. Personally, I get a queasy feeling
thinking about grown men interested in taking pictures of naked young girls.

Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2016 10:47:36   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I just read Fidel Castro is too.
--Bob


oldtigger wrote:
just heard that david hamilton is dead

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 15:53:05   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
If Hamilton was a "Predator" then what are the parents of all the young ladies that modeled for him? Pimps?

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 16:08:23   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
though his worth as a man might be in question, he was very good at capturing that brief period
that transforms a child into a woman

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 16:34:33   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
romanticf16 wrote:
If Hamilton was a "Predator" then what are the parents of all the young ladies that modeled for him? Pimps?


Only if they were actively aware and willingly part of the process, if such a "process" ever existed. Firstly, the allegations are as yet unproven, although it is possible that they could be legitimate. We may never know. However, we are finding more and more historical evidence of problens that we didn't think about in our "Age of Innocence."

Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2016 16:43:15   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
oldtigger wrote:
though his worth as a man might be in question, he was very good at capturing that brief period
that transforms a child into a woman


I completely agree, but with such work that some people considered to be 'borderline' at best comes an enhanced responsibility for transparency and independent observers. If it was found out that he did, in fact "cross the line" then it casts doubt on so many things, which I find disturbing in many ways. I've always liked his work, but now I'm glad I never owned any of it in any form. Consenting adults is one thing, but impressionable children or adolescents are a very different ball of wax.

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 18:39:13   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
Dedo wrote:
Like Jock Sturges' photography, Hamilton's work is considered artistic and valid. Personally, I get a queasy feeling
thinking about grown men interested in taking pictures of naked young girls.


Me too, it's creepy.

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 19:37:42   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
rpavich wrote:
Me too, it's creepy.


So to question a little further, what is it that makes it creepy? There isn't anything wrong with the human form, nor with the transition from childhood to adulthood, in my opinion.

Is it ourselves and our own personal motivations or peculiarities that we should be questioning? Is the problem in our own minds?

It seems to be our own motives that we should be questioning, and certainly any actions that we take as a result of our own possibly misplaced feelings. The boys and girls are the innocent ones, and our job is surely not to take advantage, as either a photographer or as a viewer of the material, or in any other context. I personally didn't find his images to be a problem, but I certainly asked questions when I first saw his work back in the sixties and seventies. I still don't find a problem with the images, but if he "crossed the line" in his interactions with his subjects that is a very different matter, and then creepy is a wholly inadequate word.

There is nothing wrong with the human form in my opinion, clothed or otherwise, but how we react to it is a very different thing and our problem as responsible adults. Or otherwise. Sadly we seem to be discovering more and more individuals on the 'otherwise' side of things.

Perhaps we need to question the very nature of humanity, and what it means?

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 20:27:49   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
Peterff wrote:
...
Perhaps we need to question the very nature of humanity, and what it means?

humans are self serving animals with one exception:
as adults most of us are hard wired to protect children whether there are laws or not.
Thats the way it is and thats the way it needs to be.
Can't remember all the requests i've received to take a series of shots of children; i
just turn them all down. not worth the risk.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.