Which Shot??
Jun 28, 2015 16:13:57 #
Mark7829
Loc: Calfornia
Neither one. Sorry, the branches are distracting. Since it is just a bird and not an action shot, I would have cropped to 90% of the bird where I could see much more detail in the eyes , beak, etc. I would have also opened up the aperture a little more as well. Nice shot regardless.
Jun 28, 2015 16:27:11 #
Mark7829 wrote:
Neither one. Sorry, the branches are distracting. Since it is just a bird and not an action shot, I would have cropped to 90% of the bird where I could see much more detail in the eyes , beak, etc. I would have also opened up the aperture a little more as well. Nice shot regardless.
Sorry you did not like the shots....perhaps next time.. :thumbup:
Jun 28, 2015 23:08:39 #
#1 definitely, Harve, 'cause in #1 his head isn't turned away like in #2.
That's really a beautiful shot that ought to be on your wall!
That's really a beautiful shot that ought to be on your wall!
Jun 28, 2015 23:22:00 #
sailorsmom wrote:
#1 definitely, Harve, 'cause in #1 his head isn't turned away like in #2.
That's really a beautiful shot that ought to be on your wall!
That's really a beautiful shot that ought to be on your wall!
Thanks, Sue...appreciate the kind comment... :thumbup:
Jul 1, 2015 07:01:43 #
hb3 wrote:
Caught this little Male Cardinal in the bush...was able to get a couple of shots before he flew...these shots are cropped. Which do you like better and how might you crop differently...thanks!
Definitely # 1 Harve and I wouldn't crop. In this one we can really see more of the character of the bird. :thumbup:
Jul 1, 2015 10:42:49 #
jwt wrote:
Definitely # 1 Harve and I wouldn't crop. In this one we can really see more of the character of the bird. :thumbup:
Thanks, Jim.... :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.