Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Just More Hypocrisy From A Democrat!
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 20, 2014 10:29:01   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
Why doesn't O'Malley simply find a place to house these illegal aliens in a liberal enclave in Maryland. There are many to choose from. Typical hypocrisy!


It’s not that Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley doesn’t want the child migrants in Maryland — he was just trying to protect them from his racist constituents.

O’Malley, who’s been a vocal critic of the Obama administration for its efforts to return the migrant children to their home countries, came under fire this week when a conversation was leaked in which he asked a top White House adviser not to send any of the migrants to his state.

“Please don’t send these kids to western Maryland,” he told White House domestic policy adviser Cecilia Munoz on Friday.

In a Wednesday interview, he clarified that he simply “suggested to them that the location still under consideration in Westminster might not be the most inviting environment for the kids,” after explaining that the proposed shelter in Westminster is deeply conservative and even voted to make English the county’s official language. (RELATED: Gallup Poll Says Obama’s Border Meltdown Is Nation’s Top Problem)

O’Malley, who is seriously considering a run for the presidency in 2016, said his fears were confirmed when graffiti reading “No illeagles here. No undocumented Democrats” was found on the potential site.

“I think every governor and every mayor in America, and every American citizen, has some responsibility and role to play here,” he said Wednesday. “It’s who we are as a people.”


http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/16/omalley-i-was-just-trying-to-protect-the-migrants-from-my-racist-constituents/#ixzz381CoF2Al

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 10:38:22   #
New York Steve Loc: St. Augustine, Florida
 
Yeah, good thing we never see hypocrisy from the right, huh?

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 11:18:49   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
New York Steve wrote:
Yeah, good thing we never see hypocrisy from the right, huh?


Exactly, you have to look pretty hard to find it there!! And your statement coming from you, who claims to be conservative. That I doubt!

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2014 11:38:46   #
davefales Loc: Virginia
 
Jakebrake wrote:


“Please don’t send these kids to western Maryland,” he told White House domestic policy adviser Cecilia Munoz on Friday.



What proof do we have he actually said that (such as a recording?)

It could be that he is just scoring slick political points against conservatives. A pol with his kind of ambition is certainly capable of manipulation.

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 11:56:58   #
New York Steve Loc: St. Augustine, Florida
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Exactly, you have to look pretty hard to find it there!! And your statement coming from you, who claims to be conservative. That I doubt!


Why? because I don't toe the party line?

Sorry, but I like to think for myself. You're clearly not burdened by such a choice.

I don't believe that the proof of someone's ideology lies in who he agrees with. It lies in what he, personally, believes. Unlike you, I don't try to hide the fact that conservatives are every bit as flawed as liberals. Trying to hide that only makes a person look ignorant and inept.

Finding hypocrisy on the right is a simple exercise. For starters, let's take the cases of John Lennon and Natalie Maines. John Lennon stated that The Beatles were more popular than Jesus Christ. Conservatives in this country lost their minds. When Natalie Maines was critical of George Bush, the same thing happened. Boycotts, record burnings and cancelled concerts were common.

But let some clown from Duck Dynasty profess a belief in Jesus Christ and, well, that's freedom of speech, and any negative reaction to that is completely uncalled for.

Two words: "Jimmy Swaggart".

Following President Clinton's admission that he'd committed adultery, Senator John Ensign called on Clinton to resign, saying that Clinton "has no credibility left".

In 2004, Ensign spoke on the sanctity of the institution of marriage:

Marriage is the cornerstone on which our society was founded. For those who say that the Constitution is so sacred that we cannot or should not adopt the Federal Marriage Amendment, I would simply point out that marriage, and the sanctity of that institution, predates the American Constitution and the founding of our nation.

Senator Ensign resigned his Senate seat after an investigation revealed an extra-marital affair.

Two more words: "Jim Bakker".

Newt Gingrich resigned from the House after admitting in 1998 to having had an affair with his intern while he was married to his second wife, and at the same time he was leading the impeachment of Bill Clinton for perjury regarding an affair with his intern Monica Lewinsky.

Bob Barr (R-GA) had an affair while married. Barr had been the first lawmaker in either chamber to call for Clinton's resignation due to the Lewinsky affair.

In 1995 speaking of the then recent affairs of Republican Robert Packwood and the unfolding affair of Democrat Bill Clinton, Republican Indiana Congressman Dan Burton made this statement:

"No one, regardless of what party they serve, no one, regardless of what branch of government they serve, should be allowed to get away with these alleged sexual improprieties..."

In 1998 the magazine Vanity Fair was slated to print an article detailing an affair which Burton himself had in 1983 which produced a child. Before publication Burton admitted to fathering a son with a former state employee

Seriously, I could do this all day. To suggest that it's difficult to find hypocrisy from those on the right is to demonstrate a woefully poor knowledge of relatively recent events. It further demonstrates the willingness of those on the right to lie and obfuscate while being critical of those on the left for doing the same.

So, yeah, you can go. I'm done with you for now...

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 11:59:30   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
New York Steve wrote:
Why? because I don't toe the party line?

Sorry, but I like to think for myself. You're clearly not burdened by such a choice.

I don't believe that the proof of someone's ideology lies in who he agrees with. It lies in what he, personally, believes.

Finding hypocrisy on the right is a simple exercise. For starters, let's take the cases of John Lennon and Natalie Maines. John Lennon stated that The Beatles were more popular than Jesus Christ. Conservatives in this country lost their minds. When Natalie Maines was critical of George Bush, the same thing happened. Boycotts, record burnings and cancelled concerts were common.

But let some clown from Duck Dynasty profess a belief in Jesus Christ and, well, that's freedom of speech, and any negative reaction to that is completely uncalled for.

Two words: "Jimmy Swaggart".

Following President Clinton's admission that he'd committed adultery, Senator John Ensign called on Clinton to resign, saying that Clinton "has no credibility left".

In 2004, Ensign spoke on the sanctity of the institution of marriage:

Marriage is the cornerstone on which our society was founded. For those who say that the Constitution is so sacred that we cannot or should not adopt the Federal Marriage Amendment, I would simply point out that marriage, and the sanctity of that institution, predates the American Constitution and the founding of our nation.

Senator Ensign resigned his Senate seat after an investigation revealed an extra-marital affair.

Two more words: "Jim Bakker".

Newt Gingrich resigned from the House after admitting in 1998 to having had an affair with his intern while he was married to his second wife, and at the same time he was leading the impeachment of Bill Clinton for perjury regarding an affair with his intern Monica Lewinsky.

Bob Barr (R-GA) had an affair while married. Barr had been the first lawmaker in either chamber to call for Clinton's resignation due to the Lewinsky affair.

In 1995 speaking of the then recent affairs of Republican Robert Packwood and the unfolding affair of Democrat Bill Clinton, Republican Indiana Congressman Dan Burton made this statement:

"No one, regardless of what party they serve, no one, regardless of what branch of government they serve, should be allowed to get away with these alleged sexual improprieties..."

In 1998 the magazine Vanity Fair was slated to print an article detailing an affair which Burton himself had in 1983 which produced a child. Before publication Burton admitted to fathering a son with a former state employee

Seriously, I could do this all day. To suggest that it's difficult to find hypocrisy from those on the right is to demonstrate a woefully poor knowledge of relatively recent events. It further demonstrates the willingness of those on the right to lie and obfuscate while being critical of those on the left for doing the same.

So, yeah, you can go. I'm done with you for now...
Why? because I don't toe the party line? br br S... (show quote)


Love it!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 15:52:07   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
New York Steve wrote:
Why? because I don't toe the party line?

Sorry, but I like to think for myself. You're clearly not burdened by such a choice.

I don't believe that the proof of someone's ideology lies in who he agrees with. It lies in what he, personally, believes. Unlike you, I don't try to hide the fact that conservatives are every bit as flawed as liberals. Trying to hide that only makes a person look ignorant and inept.

Finding hypocrisy on the right is a simple exercise. For starters, let's take the cases of John Lennon and Natalie Maines. John Lennon stated that The Beatles were more popular than Jesus Christ. Conservatives in this country lost their minds. When Natalie Maines was critical of George Bush, the same thing happened. Boycotts, record burnings and cancelled concerts were common.

But let some clown from Duck Dynasty profess a belief in Jesus Christ and, well, that's freedom of speech, and any negative reaction to that is completely uncalled for.

Two words: "Jimmy Swaggart".

Following President Clinton's admission that he'd committed adultery, Senator John Ensign called on Clinton to resign, saying that Clinton "has no credibility left".

In 2004, Ensign spoke on the sanctity of the institution of marriage:

Marriage is the cornerstone on which our society was founded. For those who say that the Constitution is so sacred that we cannot or should not adopt the Federal Marriage Amendment, I would simply point out that marriage, and the sanctity of that institution, predates the American Constitution and the founding of our nation.

Senator Ensign resigned his Senate seat after an investigation revealed an extra-marital affair.

Two more words: "Jim Bakker".

Newt Gingrich resigned from the House after admitting in 1998 to having had an affair with his intern while he was married to his second wife, and at the same time he was leading the impeachment of Bill Clinton for perjury regarding an affair with his intern Monica Lewinsky.

Bob Barr (R-GA) had an affair while married. Barr had been the first lawmaker in either chamber to call for Clinton's resignation due to the Lewinsky affair.

In 1995 speaking of the then recent affairs of Republican Robert Packwood and the unfolding affair of Democrat Bill Clinton, Republican Indiana Congressman Dan Burton made this statement:

"No one, regardless of what party they serve, no one, regardless of what branch of government they serve, should be allowed to get away with these alleged sexual improprieties..."

In 1998 the magazine Vanity Fair was slated to print an article detailing an affair which Burton himself had in 1983 which produced a child. Before publication Burton admitted to fathering a son with a former state employee

Seriously, I could do this all day. To suggest that it's difficult to find hypocrisy from those on the right is to demonstrate a woefully poor knowledge of relatively recent events. It further demonstrates the willingness of those on the right to lie and obfuscate while being critical of those on the left for doing the same.

So, yeah, you can go. I'm done with you for now...
Why? because I don't toe the party line? br br S... (show quote)


I see from your juvenile tirade you conveniently forgot Bill Clinton and Anthony Weiner. Why am I not surprised!

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2014 15:53:37   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
GeorgeH wrote:
Love it!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


You would undoubtedly agree with liberal New York Steve, again, not surprised.

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 17:52:31   #
New York Steve Loc: St. Augustine, Florida
 
Jakebrake wrote:
I see from your juvenile tirade you conveniently forgot Bill Clinton and Anthony Weiner. Why am I not surprised!


No, I didn't.

You said one would have to look hard to find hypocrisy from the right. Bill Clinton and Anthony Wiener, last time I checked, were not on the right. I could easily give you examples of hypocrisy from the left, as it's as easy to find as the hypocrisy from the right.

But, again, perhaps you need to be reminded that your point was that it would be difficult to find hypocrisy on the right. Well, your "point" has been shown to be baseless.

You have been proven wrong...

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 17:55:28   #
New York Steve Loc: St. Augustine, Florida
 
Jakebrake wrote:
You would undoubtedly agree with liberal New York Steve, again, not surprised.


You're an idiot.

Liberal? Me?

I support a strong military. I do not support amnesty for illegal aliens. I'm in favor of sealing the borders. I am against the redistribution of wealth. I am a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment. I vehemently oppose Obamacare.

Howsabout you stop me when I get to something that you deem "liberal", Dumbass.

Again, you're just another right-wing parrot who's too Goddamn stupid to think for himself. You've been told that anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% is a liberal.

You're an idiot...

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 20:00:55   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
"It's not that Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley doesn't want the child migrants in Maryland - he was just trying to protect them from his racist constituents."

Makes sense to me. Where is the hypocrisy? He didn't say he didn't want them in the state, he said that a racist district might not be the best location. I agree. Don't you?

Now, Republicans wanting to keep suspects in indefinite detention - many of who are now known to be innocent - but not wanting them housed in their home states? That is hypocrisy.

Mike

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2014 22:54:42   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
New York Steve wrote:
You're an idiot.

Liberal? Me?

I support a strong military. I do not support amnesty for illegal aliens. I'm in favor of sealing the borders. I am against the redistribution of wealth. I am a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment. I vehemently oppose Obamacare.

Howsabout you stop me when I get to something that you deem "liberal", Dumbass.

Again, you're just another right-wing parrot who's too Goddamn stupid to think for himself. You've been told that anyone who doesn't agree with you 100% is a liberal.

You're an idiot...
You're an idiot. br br Liberal? Me? br br I supp... (show quote)


Yea and I could care less what you call me, (as you are exhibiting behaviour liberals tend to do in name calling) and I'm not that far gone to see you for what you really are and that's an obama shill, and that opinion is derived from your asinine posts. If you are a conservative there moron, I'm a flaming liberal! Troll on there good buddy and you can kiss my ass on the way by!

Reply
Jul 20, 2014 23:25:26   #
New York Steve Loc: St. Augustine, Florida
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Yea and I could care less what you call me, (as you are exhibiting behaviour liberals tend to do in name calling) and I'm not that far gone to see you for what you really are and that's an obama shill, and that opinion is derived from your asinine posts. If you are a conservative there moron, I'm a flaming liberal! Troll on there good buddy and you can kiss my ass on the way by!


I know a guy who was kicked in the head by a horse when he was a kid. He drools out of one side of his mouth and eats his own snot. Developmentally speaking, he's the mental equivalent of a four year old.

You're not quite as intelligent as he is.

It's funny that you accuse liberals of "name calling". I remember Rush Limbaugh back in the "Calypso Louie" days. And how about Michael Savage? That guy is the king of immature name-calling.

Now, somehow, I'm sure you'd want to make the retarded argument that their name-calling tactics are different.

As I said, you've done nothing to refute any of the statements I've made here. Nothing. You're a complete failure. Why? Well, there are two possible reasons: Either there's nothing to refute my statements with (you'd have to show that my statements are untrue), or you're just too Goddamn stupid to do it.

Which is it?

You're cloaked in failure. You probably don't realize that simply because that's just par for the course for you. If you were ever to actually succeed at anything, you'd wet yourself.

And, again, you're the type of pinhead who believes that only someone who believes 100% as you do can be a "conservative". You believe that no one should be permitted to think for themselves. You believe that no one should be able to express an opinion which differs from your own and be a conservative.

No, my friend Len (the guy kicked by the horse) is a far sight smarter than you. While his thoughts may be quite child-like, at least they're his own. They're also far more complex than anything you're likely to ever belch up.

You are incapable of thinking for yourself, which is why you parrot Republican talking points.

Believe it or not, it's entirely possible to be a conservative and not agree with the idiotic tripe you spit up...

Reply
Jul 21, 2014 07:22:59   #
BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
 
davefales wrote:
What proof do we have he actually said that (such as a recording?)

It could be that he is just scoring slick political points against conservatives. A pol with his kind of ambition is certainly capable of manipulation.


It was on the TV news.
Maryland is split somewhat like Colorado. Baltimore City, Prince Georges and Montgomery Counties - these counties surround DC (bedroom communities), are HIGHLY Democratic and have the largest population (votes). The rest of the State is Republican and has the fewer votes. That's why we have O'Malley. He should go back to his Irish nightclub band and the muscle t-shirts.

Reply
Jul 21, 2014 08:48:55   #
ryanhawkerxp
 
I felt because of the obvious misspelling that the spray painted building was done by someone on the left. Typical stereotype of a redneck which is how they portray those on the right. Montgomery County is the center for most illegal alien activities in Maryland along with MS13. The previous poster has it right with what counties are OK with it. Maryland is one of the most desirable areas for illegals and is a known sanctuary state... Owe Malley has brought in more than 40 new taxes in his tenure including a rain tax.... Corporations are leaving the state in droves. We will see the fruits of his administration..... And pay for it....

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.