Has anyone asked her what she wants?
Haha. I am sure she has seen more brightly colors, in all forms, that we could ever imagine. She is entitled to wear whatever she wants. Ten different outfits, no problem!
Is it true that they have stopped the marathons in Tanzania because no one ever crossed the finish line? :)
How about a kayak? It could really be fun.
You will have a great time. It is impossible not to take great photos. Folks are amazed at the opportunities.
Machu Pichu was a “snap.” It doesn’t move. But no money has been spent on safety rails. They already have your money. Ha. Everyone was very nice. Very nice. Don’t worry about The full size buses passing each other on a single lane dirt road
Galapagos:stay on the paths. Snap away.
I was on a special adventure (they are all special). There was a lot of jumping from boat to boat and boat to ......
Weight did matter. Talk to the guides and those who have been there. Most will assure you that weight is not a problem. But decide what to take after some investigation. Every adventure is not the same as every other one.
The ethical questions you raise are significant. I wrestle with, I think, a bit less esoteric issue. I may be secure in the knowledge that I have a “legal” right to take a photo. But how do I measure whether the distribution of the photo may be an “abuse” of my right?
Taking pictures of children without consent of a parent. A picture of a dismembered body caused by an auto accident. I guess my dilemma really has less to do with “taking” the photo and more to do with whether the sharing of the photo might be an abuse. How would I feel if it was my child or my relative? How does one balance the”great photo” with the intrusion and emotional impact of offering publication of a fellow human. A mountain will not be “hurt” if a photo is taken. But does a photo of another person ever create an ethical dilemma regarding its publication?
Truly wonderful. I was on safari many years ago and was very happy with my photos. But yours are extraordinary.
I believe that we photographers are pretty respectful of others. But I do notice, from time to time, that some folks think that their desire to take a picture supersedes the right of others to get a clear view of the event. Everyone has an IPhone, so this is what I most frequently notice. It seems many folks think that just because they intend to take a picture, the camera is a ticket to step in front of others who are just captivated by event. I have probably done this myself, even without realizing it. Does this bother anyone else?
I believe most operators will provide ready to use bean bags.
Makes me laugh with excitement. Wow, I can hear the waves crashing. What fun. Excellent.
Rights smites. Get your butt out of the car. Safety is an issue that is paramount to privacy.
On the street at least a person has the opportunity to express their wish not to have their picture taken. From the vehicle can we say it is like a drive by “shooting.” And just because the government is doing something do we, as photographers, want to follow in the government’s footsteps? We, photographers, should be ambassadors and welcome those who have concerns. Do you have no concern when a stranger snaps a picture of your young grandchild? Right should not be the only consideration. We can be kind to others, can’t we? It seems a great deal of discussions first make it clear that there is a right to take street pictures. Then next discussion is how do we sneak pictures so that others cannot express their concerns. Does anyone feel uncomfortable sneaking pictures of others?