Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: KerryF
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Jan 8, 2024 12:23:22   #
Cylus wrote:
I just got a Canon R6 Mark II in December to replace my 60D. I am leaving for a trip to India later this month. I know you are not supposed to take a new camera on a trip till you are more familiar with it - but this is similar to my 60D. I am concerned about camera theft (perhaps needlessly) and am preparing to take my older Rebel to be safe. I’m not usually a “sky is falling” kind of person. Anyone been to India and what do you think - is my camera safe there? Thank you in advance


In March 2019, my wife and I went to Northern India (Delhi, Agra, Khajuraho, Jabalpur, Mumbai) and Nepal (Kathmandu and Bhaldapur) and had no problems or concerns. Could it have stolen in India? Yes, but in your case, your camera can be stolen in Maryland, so don’t worry about it! Just be aware of your surroundings and keep your camera on you/with you (as in don’t set it down someplace) at all times and enjoy your trip.
Go to
Dec 31, 2023 16:10:32   #
BebuLamar wrote:
It only allow one direction. Did you try to put a file from your computer into the Iphone?


I said it couple times that I transferred pictures in BOTH directions and it works without a problem. Again, I did this with an Apple charging cable that I connected to the usb on my pc.
Go to
Dec 31, 2023 11:53:51   #
BebuLamar wrote:
I meant try it the other way around. Transfer 1 picture from the Mac to the Iphone without the internet. I know people say why put a picture taken with another camera in to the phone? But I do have such need.


I haven't seen a response to this issue in this thread, but you can transfer pictures to and from an iphone with a direct connection between the iphone and the computer (in my case, an iphone 15 and a pc). You just take the charging cable and connect it to the iphone and to the computer, go to explorer and the iphone will show up as another device/drive. Once you give permission to allow for the connection between devices, you can (and I have) transfer pictures in both directions.
Go to
Jun 24, 2023 12:59:27   #
Alafoto wrote:
How can you be surprised at anything TSA does.


Well TSA is a Federal Department and only has authority over flights in or into the USA and I was in Argentina when this happened and I am bound by their rules, what ever they may be.
Go to
Jun 24, 2023 11:40:53   #
Everyone so often I see questions about carrying a monopod (with the rest of the camera gear) on to a plane and the typical response is that you can and it is allowed as stated on the TSA website. So here is my ACTUAL experience with my monopod.

A little back story first. I got my monopod for my Nikon 7200 with a Tamron 150-600 lens as I don't do enough upper body excercises to be able to hold it steady for long periods of time. I have taken my monopod strapped to my camera bag from San Francisco through a layover in London on our way to India and Nepal and back home without issues. I took it again from San Francisco, Vancouver, Winnipeg, and finally up to Churchill and back home again without issues.

Now it starts getting interesting on our trip to Antarctica. We flew from San Francisco to JFK (in case you are wondering why we went to JFK, it was because, for some reason, it was a lot cheaper than flying to Dallas), to Buenos Aires. Again, no problems. Now we fly from Buenos Aires to Ushuaia and it makes it through the scanner without a problem, but instead of just picking up my camera bag and walking away unnoticed, I swung it around on to my back (it's a backpack) and that is when a security agent took notice and stopped me! After checking it out he told me I would have to check it in because we wouldn't let me carry it on board the airplane. When I explained that monopods are allowed on planes, he basically said leave it behind or check it in. So I had run all the way back to the checkin counter to say goodbye to my monopod since I probably wouldn't be seeing it again and then run all the way back to security to go through security again and then to our gate. So since I have a picture of my monopod with all the stickers, it did make it through to Ushuaia (since our suitcases were already checked in, this is how my monopod was checked in, naked!) without any problems...I guess monopods are not a high value item worth taking.

Now I am the first to admit that this big and could be used as a weapon, especially for the little tripod feets, but there are no stipulations in the rules of what kind, what size of monopods are or are not allowed and I hadn't had any trouble before this trip.

So the bottom line is, no matter what the rules say (about anything), the security agents have the final word on what is and what is not allowed for carryon. For the trip home, it went into the suitcase!


Go to
Jun 23, 2023 15:01:46   #
[quote=RonDavis]
KerryF wrote:
....."Also, the definition of keepers is not black or white, if it's perfect you keep it, if not, delete it".

Humm, sounds like you've already have a decisive criteria. I'm not sure why you asked your original question, "How Many Picture Do You Keep From a Vacation"? Were you just asking for "average "keeper" rates", for statistical comparisons or just competitive curiosity?


I have been doing where I kept all my pictures for the last 20 years and after my last trip where I took so many pictures, I wanted to see if there was a consensus of what everyone kept or that everyone does what is good for them. After reading everyone’s opinion, I will probably change a little in what pictures I keep.
Go to
Jun 23, 2023 11:43:09   #
Thanks to all that replied, it was very interesting and as to be expected, everyone had a different opinion. For those who thought I took to many pictures and not taking in the experience without the camera in front of my face, let me explain my way of doing things. I leave my camera on burst mode 99% of the time regardless of what I am shooting (wildlife, landscape, or cityscape). I have a Nikon 7200 with 2 card slots, six 64GB cards (plus some older 32GB cards), so I am able to take a lot of pictures if need be. This was a 4 week trip going from the Amazon Tropics (we did a one day excursion to Uguazu Falls) to Antarctica. Normally our trips are two weeks long but some friends invited us to go on this trip with them. Most of our trips are tours, so this a vacation trip where I bring a camera as oppose to travel photography (whether it is around the corner or halfway around the world) where I don't get to plan out the shot the day before and then come back the following day at the right time to get the perfect shot. I'm there when I'm there and a take the shot that is available to me, even if it's high noon with hundreds of tourists around blocking my shot. Also, the definition of keepers is not black or white, if it's perfect you keep it, if not, delete it. For example, we went to Iceland in January to see the Northern Lights and I brought all the proper gear (such as a tripod) to capture the moment. Well, it was always cloudy and did not see them. Then we went to Churchill, Canada at the end of August to see the Polar Bears and Beluga Whales, which we did, but we also got to see the Northern Lights, but it was in less than ideal conditions. Had to deal with street lights and I didn't have my tripod, so the pictures were hand held. I had to jackup my ISO really high to minimize the shutterspeed, so my pictures were noisey and far from perfect, but they were keepers (memories!).

Some times the tours have special excursions like the time we were in India and we toured the Taj Mahal. The first time was midday and I took what I could get. The next morning, for those who wanted to go, we got up at 5am to do a sunrise tour of the Taj Mahal. A dramatic difference with no tourists in the way.




Go to
Jun 22, 2023 17:04:25   #
larryepage wrote:
That sounds like a great vacation. I can see that every shot you took documented something that caught your attention. If an image didn't have immediate recognition when you returned, there's a good chance that there will be a discussion somewhere down the line when the subject will come up as a question in conversation. It's also possible if you have an inquisitive mind that you may have a question when reviewing an image that can be answered by looking at the images just before or just after. So from my perspective, I'd suggest keeping them all, even if you do so via some sort of offline method.

Now let me ask you this question...was this a three week vacation? If so, you averaged about 325 pictures per day. If you were out and about for ten and a half hours per day, that means you snapped an image just about every two minutes all day long. For me, that's a lot of snapping.

And by the way...don't discard those experiments that didn't work. If you really want to learn that new technique, you need to study and understand what went wrong. That's the only way you can figure out how to reliably make things go right next time. I'd create a folder with images that I captured while learning. Eventually when you have everything figured out, you can decide whether to delete the whole folder.

Having said all this, I do not take this many images when I go on vacation. I am on vacation to see, experience, and maybe learn a little bit. I want to remember having been to a place or to an event. That can't be accomplished while concentrating on a camera or watching everything through a viewfinder, whether it's optical or electronic. For me, 100 shots a day represents pretty intense shooting. A year ago I attended a railroad history convention in Kansas City. We did two days of extensive touring with many stops for exploration, including a half-day train ride. I took a total of 255 carefully selected exposures and kept 250 of them. A few of those were shot through bus windows and include reflections. They are keepers, too, because they record unique experiences that are unlikely ever to be duplicated, like underneath a large crane unloading containers from railcars. Another is from the very heart of the BNSF Railway's Argentine Yard. The reflections don't matter. They are actually part of the experience. There are some "artistic" exposures also, like the decorated ceilings in Kansas City Union Passenger Terminal or a parallel track speeding by from the window of the Southwest Chief.

I'm not telling you all this claiming to be a great photographer. Some of what I kept would be of little or no interest to almost anyone else. But it's of interest to me. And I'm pretty proud of it and will look at it again down the road.
That sounds like a great vacation. I can see that... (show quote)


It was 4 days in Buenos Aires, 2 days in Ushaia, and then a 3 week cruise. Most of the time that I had my camera on continuous shooting for the wild life (7 different kinds of penguins, 3 different kinds of albatrosses, several kinds of seals, and a variety of other birds, not to mention all of the scenery at the Shetland Islands, Elephant Island, South Georgia Island, Port Stanley on the Falkland Islands, and of course the Antarctica Peninsula), in particular, there were a couple of pods of dolphins that were playing and jumping around the boat and I must of taken 500-600 shots. Then there was a large pod of Fin Whales (around 75) that again I took a lot of photos hoping to catch that one or two great shots. Yes, I took way more than I usually do because it's not likely I will be back, so I took way too many because that is better than the alternative of not taking enough!
Go to
Jun 22, 2023 16:02:17   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
I used to shoot events, mainly for non-profit organizations I belonged to. A 1-day event could yield 800 shots. A 3-day event might produce 1500. My keeper rate was generally around 10%.

But I kept them all. I have a color label system to tell me which are the ones I think are good. The rest are there for repair of problems that I find later and to provide full coverage of people who might not be in the best shots. The only ones that get deleted are the pure junk shots (but even then there could be some interesting abstracts with a little postprocessing).

I don't keep any of them on my main drive. They are all on an external drive. The internal drive is reserved for programs and essential data files.

If you want to do the housekeeping, back up everything first. Then you can go through and do triage. The backup will be there if you make a mistake and delete something you didn't plan to or hit the wrong button accidentally. I would also advise that you have sidecar files for all your shots. That way if you want to re-import an image, the edits will be there and you don't have to start over. Sidecar files are small enough that it won't impact your storage requirements significantly.
I used to shoot events, mainly for non-profit orga... (show quote)


I have the pictures backed up on multiple drives, both internal and external. This is just about a change in philosophy on which pictures I should keep and proceeding with the house cleaning. My initial thought is just keep the pictures that I have put in the time to edit and those that I felt weren't worthy of editing, shouldn't be worthy of keeping.
Go to
Jun 22, 2023 15:57:14   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
I rarely keep more than 5% of digital. So, that's 5 of every 100 or 335 of your 6700. Every initial culling pass will kick 50% or more of the original digital frames. That you kicked only 200 indicates you're not being critical enough in your initial assessment. I only keep what is edited and finished and confirmed. Even during the edit process, I always re-assess every image with the goal of getting rid of anything repetitive or inferior, even after fully edited.


I did not make it clear, my PRE-first pass was just getting rid of unuseable pictures, my actual first pass, I went from 6500 down to 850 (before I started editing). We are at way different levels of photography, at best, I am an intermediate level and so I'm not as critical as I should be, that's why I get my wife involved because she doesn't have the emotional attachment to the pictures that I do, she either likes it or doesn't.
Go to
Jun 22, 2023 15:31:54   #
So I recently went to Bueno Aires and Antarctica and I took a total of 6700 pictures. My first step to get to a managable number of pictures before I start editing, is to get rid of all of the bad/unuseable pictures (pictures of my feet, of the sky, trying something new that didn't work out, etc.). So that got it down to 6500 pictures. Then I start flagging the ones that I really liked and those that had potential but would need a lot of editing and that got the number down to 850. I then started editing the pictures as needed and there would be some that, for my level of editing with Lightroom, just didn't workout or pictures that were very similar to other pictures, and the bottom line is that I got the number down to 650 pictures that I uploaded to Shutterfly. Then my wife got involved to start putting them into a photo book and the final number of pictures that made it was 550 pictures.

So the actual question is, what number of pictures would you keep on your hard drive: all of them (6500), just the ones that you edited (850), or just the ones you uploaded?

We all have different levels of hoarding pictures that we have taken and I am curious what level you are. Up to this point, I have kept them all, but that is getting to be a lot of pictures (for me) and maybe it's time to do some house cleaning.
Go to
Apr 27, 2023 10:17:04   #
jaymatt wrote:
Because my new computer no longer supports LR6, I have gone kicking and screaming into the abyss of Adobe subscriptions. Since I now have Photoshop, I need to learn to use it.

Please suggest the better tutorials for me to learn using Photoshop.

jaymatt, aka John Matthew


What is your new computer? I’m assuming it must be a Mac because I have Win 11 and LR6 works great.
Go to
Apr 3, 2023 10:57:21   #
Just got back from Antarctica on Poseidon Expeditions (https://poseidonexpeditions.com/antarctica/falklands-south-georgia-antarctica-ultimate-wildlife-expedition/228/). This trip hits all your locations plus some more. Saw more birds than you will know what to do with! Here is a link to a video of our trip that Poseidon created of the trip. What you will see in the video is what we actually saw on that trip, there are no shots from different cruises or a different time.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yqsztnf8wcy8b30/SeaSpiritAntarcticPeninsula-SG%2BFalklands1-22Mar2023.mp4?dl=0

Additional info: 105 passengers and 72 crew members. We did two landings a day (weather permiting).
Go to
Jan 17, 2023 13:44:53   #
Bigmike1 wrote:
As far as I know silica gel is silica gel. I don't think it matters what brand.


Actually, it wasn't so much the brand as comparing the little silica synthetic packets (30 of them) vs the silica packets that are in metal tins (1 of them for the same price). Both are reuseable, but the metal tins last longer. It's not a price comparison that I am after, just if one works better/more convienent or it's just personal preference.
Go to
Jan 17, 2023 13:27:24   #
A number of years ago, I went to China and had the experience of going from an a/c room to hot and humid outside and my lens fogged up. So my question for Antarctica, should I be concerned by going from a cold outside to a warm room? I had one person tell me to put my camera in an insulated lunch bag.

Also, I have been looking at silica gel packs to help absorb moisture and I wanted to know if the Ruggard Desiccant Silica Gel Pack (or Pelican or any other brand) is any better or same as the standard gel packs (reuseable)?

Thanks for your input/help.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.