AndyH wrote:
What does "correct" exposure mean?
If you mean an exposure that allows you to print the full dynamic range of the scene in your selected medium (monitor, paper, metal print, transparency, etc.) then it means exposing for the highlights in digital media, exposing for the shadows in film.
If you intend to project a high key or low key image, one that runs either the highlights or shadows together, but leaves the other end well delineated, it's something different as well.
I remember taking sunset photos in my early years, with a film camera and hand held meter. I bracketed at one stop intervals on Kodachrome to get a variety of choices for my final images. You couldn't stretch the contrast in the darkroom, and underexposed slides developed a greenish or bluish cast that was very unappealing. I would meter on the foreground, on an average basis, and on an incident dome, to see what looked best.
The answer, as Kodachrome veterans may have already inferred, is "it depends". Sometimes the vision I saw in the viewfinder was best expressed as a darker exposure, sometimes one that would objectively be considered overexposed.
It was always an artistic or value judgment, even in this inherently SOOC type of photography. Although we have more tools to expand our choices on how to project our visions today, it remains an artistic judgment, at least in my opinion.
Andy
What does "correct" exposure mean? br b... (
show quote)
Well Stated! In the end, Judgement is a mere assessment of reflected and absorbed Light on the retina which varies with persons. Given that we all see the spectrum differently, is not beauty an abstract value because the eye can't measure what it can't see. Hence beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I would also suggest there is often an emotional value that skews what we see irrespective of all other photographic measures and viewers.