Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: seawarrior
Mar 14, 2019 19:28:06   #
Ronsh wrote:
Well with what little I know, I think using the lower ISO is for stacking images. Shoot a lot of images at lower iso gives you less noise. Stack with something like Starry Landscape Stacker, there’s a few others that folks like also. It depends on what type of computer you have .
May want to check this new e- magazine
https://www.darkskytravels.com/magazine
Love shooting at night so please share.
Ron


Killer Magazine!!!
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 19:18:39   #
Will definitely take the info and apply it! I will follow up with photos after the weekend...

V/r,

SW
Go to
Mar 14, 2019 19:16:20   #
many thanks ron!
Go to
Mar 13, 2019 23:42:28   #
Hey everybody. Just joined the site as I have been curious about Astrophotography and am ready to go beyond the single exposure MW shots and also into some "starter" DSO's, but definitely need some tribal knowledge on this topic.

I am excited as I will be in VA for the next 3 months for work as it will offer plenty of dark skies.

Other than that, I am going to post below my previous question I incorrectly left in a previous forum...

Cheers and have a great night!

SW-
-----

I am looking for recommendations for unguided/untracked tips if you have a moment to offer your advice?... My hope is to be able to get photos close to the quality of the two Orion Nebulas above (understanding I am looking at taking darn near a thousand photos or more to increase the SNR).

Specifically, I shoot with a Nikon D500 (all NR and internal settings off) and would like to shoot with my Nikon AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR at about 150mm, framing Orions belt and the Nebula. SS about 1-1.3secs depending on star trails. My question is with the ISO, though. I have been reading a lot of the forums mentioning around 12,800 ISO and others, on the lower ISO team, stating shoot lower (400-1600) ISO. I am under the impression that the lower ISO will be for the tracked photos with longer exposures, but am open to any thoughts on the matter.

Additionally, I have a Tokina 11-16 mm and the Nikkor Kit lens that came with the camera (Nikon 16-80 mm F/2.8-4.0 DX) which also takes some killer MW photos if you believe either of those would be better for my intro-to-AP stacking lesson.

I know the equipment listed isn't ideal, but my goal is to get "brilliant at the basics" before purchasing mounts, scopes, etc...

Lastly, I recognize personal trial and error will be key, but was hoping to get some good lessons learned from someone shooting with similar equipment and getting the type of results I am seeking.

Thanks for any help and happy shooting.

SW-

Nikon D500, Kit lens, SS: 10 Sec, ISO: 3200, F2.8 - Single Exposure :(

Go to
Mar 13, 2019 23:07:34   #
Europa wrote:
Where will you be shooting from? What’s your sky like?


I'll be shooting in VA generally. Staunton River State Park (VA) which is a Dark Sky Site and rates appx a Bortle scale value of 3-4. I will also be headed to Shenandoah National State Park as well to see how clear of skies I can get there. Maybe 2.5 or so on the west side of the park if I am extremely lucky. The rest will be near Charlottesville, VA., which gets around a 4 or so.

Correction to the Bortle ratings...I had them backwards (sorry)...all sites will be around 5-7.
Go to
Mar 13, 2019 21:18:35   #
7awol wrote:
I started pointing my camera up at the night sky about two years ago. Tripod mounted Nikon D700 with a fast super wide making 30 second exposures of the Milky Way. Got hooked. Bought a tracker this past summer. Ioptron SkyGuider Pro. Got pleasing results with an old Nikkor 135mm f2.8Q on the D700 but wanted more reach. Mounted the 300mm PF and Nikon D500 (my birding outfit) on the SkyGuider and made the image below. I liked the result. I showed my wife. She wondered why the bright star Orion Iota (at the 5 o'clock position) had a soft fuzzy haze surrounding it. I shrugged my shoulders...I had no idea. I searched and could not find any astro images made with the 300 PF.
The next night was clear so I replaced the 300PF with my old 70-200 f2.8 and made the second image below. I used the same exposure setting for both (90 seconds, f4, ISO 2500) and stacked 8 images using PS. Orion Iota looks much different to me.
Does my Nikkor 300mm f4e PF have a cataract?
I started pointing my camera up at the night sky a... (show quote)


7awol et al...great photos! However, I am looking for recommendations for unguided/untracked tips if you have a moment to offer your advice?... My hope is to be able to get photos close to the quality of the two Orion Nebulas above (understanding I am looking at taking darn near a thousand photos or more to increase the SNR).

Specifically, I shoot with a Nikon D500 (all NR and internal settings off) and would like to shoot with my Nikon AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR at about 150mm, framing Orions belt and the Nebula. SS about 1-1.3secs depending on star trails. My question is with the ISO, though. I have been reading a lot of the forums mentioning around 12,800 ISO and others, on the lower ISO team, stating shoot lower (400-1600) ISO. I am under the impression that the lower ISO will be for the tracked photos with longer exposures, but am open to any thoughts on the matter.

Additionally, I have a Tokina 11-16 mm and the Nikkor Kit lens that came with the camera (Nikon 16-80 mm F/2.8-4.0 DX) which also takes some killer MW photos if you believe either of those would be better for my intro-to-AP stacking lesson.

I know the equipment listed isn't ideal, but my goal is to get "brilliant at the basics" before purchasing mounts, scopes, etc...

Lastly, I recognize personal trial and error will be key, but was hoping to get some good lessons learned from someone shooting with similar equipment and getting the type of results I am seeking.

Thanks for any help and happy shooting.

SW-
Go to
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.