Jklovell wrote:
I’m a nurse and a part time landscape photographer. Recently, as I was reorganizing my locker, my director noticed some of my printed images that had fallen to the floor as I was cleaning. She asked to see them and subsequently showed them to upper management. They, in turn, asked if I could provide them with a few large prints for the admin. lounge. I did. Fortunately, they turned out to be quite nice looking. Then they asked for a portfolio of my best images, which I provided. I edited them in LR and PS and printed all of them at 8.5 X 11in on my Canon Pro-300. I now have to meet with them on March 1, 2022, this coming Tuesday for a walk through the commons areas of the hospital. I’m kind of excited about the whole thing; not for financial gain, but for the exposure. My wife, on the other hand, feels like I need to get paid. Of course I agree that with all the effort and expenditures, I need some sort of compensation. I’m just not sure how to approach them with regard to money. I’ve considered buying the Canon Pro- 4000 to be able to do all of the printing myself. How should I approach them regarding money. I’d like to be able to reimburse myself for the printer.
Thanks,
J
I’m a nurse and a part time landscape photographer... (
show quote)
As someone whose profession is in the arts, I think it is very important that we separate our love for our art - and love of the exposure - from what we get paid. So many non-artists have a romanticized image of the "starving artist". I am lucky enough to work in a professional orchestra - where pay and working conditions are collectively bargained. Obviously you are not within that structure for your photography - but please, do not short-change yourself. Please consider negotiating a sensible reimbursement/fee for the beauty you provide.
keywest305 wrote:
I just read the Google pixel 6 pro is the best and beats Samsung 21 ultra in the camera dept. Plus $600 cheaper. Worth a look
Just my impression playing with the Pixel 6 Pro in the store, was that although it is trying to be of "flagship" quality, the overall construction, fit and finish, was not up to the Samsung flagships. Reviews also give it mediocre battery life.
I'm waiting to see what the Samsung S22 Ultra camera looks like - should be rolled out in February. I have been using a Samsung Note 10, which has given very good photo results. Wondering if the S22 will offer a noticeable improvement. The thing I like about the Note 10 and other recent Samsung phones is the "Pro Mode", which allows control of exposure, shutter speed/aperture, ISO, focus, white balance, color temperature, etc. I have found this very useful in certain situations. Apple and Google offer little manual control. However, Apple is still acknowledged as having the best video.
I casually tried out the Pixel 6 Pro's camera in a Verizon store recently; found the HDR qualities impressive, but overall the images looked too "cooked" for my taste.
Probably Apple will up the tele camera, or add an extra one, in their next edition. I'm having so much fun with a Samsung Note 10 Plus, and getting arguably as good or better results than my beloved Sony RX100 IV, that the Sony sits on the shelf most of the time now.
Samsung S21 Ultra four separate cameras - 35mm full frame equivalents: 2.2mm 13 mm equivalent 0.6x camera; 6.7 mm 24 mm equivalent 1,0x camera; 9 mm 72 mm equivalent 3x camera; 31 mm 240 mm equivalent 10x camera.
alexol wrote:
"What's the highest equivalent focal length you can get with your smartphones?"
At the moment, the Samsung 21 Ultra has only 3x optical and 10x digital, with its 108Mb sensor.
Xiaomi unveiled a concept retractable phone camera which is supposed to have a 200x OPTICAL zoom, when/if it makes it to market.
It is very, very early days yet for smartphones which have improved by quantic leaps in the last few years, compared to conventional cameras which have only managed incremental improvements in the same timeframe.
"What's the highest equivalent focal length y... (
show quote)
Just for the record: the Samsung Galaxy 21 Ultra has 0.5, 1x, 3x, and 10x Optical cameras.
A sincere thank you for everyone's opinions and guidance.
Seeking better image quality, I'm in the process of choosing a crop frame or perhaps a compact full frame mirrorless to replace my Sony RX100 IV. I have a separate thread on that issue, but thought it better to start a new one regarding one aspect of choosing: in-camera stabilization vs in-lens stabilization vs none. I am spoiled by being able to shoot the Sony in relatively low light, not just because of the relatively fast lens f1.8-2.8 built-in zoom, but also because of the in-body stabilization it provides. Those two features really help make the most of the 1-inch sensor. I'd like to hear your opinion about which system is best, all-around, in real world shooting, for crop and full frame cameras. I'm mostly concerned with keeping ISOs lower while hand-holding in low light. I understand that stabilization does not help if the object is moving. I have a musician's hands, but feel stabilization has been beneficial.
Thank you in advance for your advice.
I am also interested in this camera, and would appreciate any more real-life experience stories. Have already read a number of reviews, which are mixed.
mcacm111 wrote:
I would like to ask for advice on what camera to purchase next. Perhaps some background would help. Twenty years ago I sold my Nikon manual film SLR and began to use point-and-shoot digitals. My two most recent cameras were a Sony NEX-3, and, for the last 4-5 years, a Sony RX100 IV. The aim was minimal weight and bulk, with acceptable image quality; and I'm happy enough with the Sony's 24-70mm (35 mm equivalent) zoom range. I almost exclusively shoot jpegs, editing some of those. I take some issue with the color of the Sony's out-of-camera jpegs; have decided I want higher IQ and more dial controls; and am willing to accept somewhat more bulk and weight. Probably would only purchase a few lenses. Am considering the following cameras: Fujifilm XT-30 or possibly XT-3, Canon M6 II, Nikon Z50 (APS-C); or Canon RP, Nikon Z5, Sony A7 II (full frame). Would most likely start out with a modest zoom, and would like to initially stay closer to $1K than $2K if possible. Notice I'm looking for compactness within those categories; and wondering if I really need to go to full frame.
Any opinions would be most appreciated.
I would like to ask for advice on what camera to p... (
show quote)
Thank you so much to everyone for your advice. I will definitely take a look at Olympus more closely; but am right now leaning towards Fujifilm. The XT-3 price drop makes it especially tempting, especially with the 18-55 zoom. Will be doing some hands-on in NYC later this week. By "more dial controls" I mean I'd prefer more and larger physical dials - preferably on the top plate - than on my little Sony. But not so interested in touch screen controls.
I would like to ask for advice on what camera to purchase next. Perhaps some background would help. Twenty years ago I sold my Nikon manual film SLR and began to use point-and-shoot digitals. My two most recent cameras were a Sony NEX-3, and, for the last 4-5 years, a Sony RX100 IV. The aim was minimal weight and bulk, with acceptable image quality; and I'm happy enough with the Sony's 24-70mm (35 mm equivalent) zoom range. I almost exclusively shoot jpegs, editing some of those. I take some issue with the color of the Sony's out-of-camera jpegs; have decided I want higher IQ and more dial controls; and am willing to accept somewhat more bulk and weight. Probably would only purchase a few lenses. Am considering the following cameras: Fujifilm XT-30 or possibly XT-3, Canon M6 II, Nikon Z50 (APS-C); or Canon RP, Nikon Z5, Sony A7 II (full frame). Would most likely start out with a modest zoom, and would like to initially stay closer to $1K than $2K if possible. Notice I'm looking for compactness within those categories; and wondering if I really need to go to full frame.
Any opinions would be most appreciated.
OleMe wrote:
Looking for a pocket sized camera. Had a Canon Elph-like that was great but lost it on a trip!
The Canon Elph 360 is close to what I had but lacks a view finder and gets several negative reliability reviews at Amazon.
A view finder would be a real plus as I like outdoor photography and the sun washes out a digital screen. Small size is most important - not cargo pocket size. Some telephoto also desired.
/Roger
It seems like you're looking for a SMALL camera - unfortunately some folks on this thread don't understand that. If you could find a small enough 1" sensor camera (hopefully with a viewfinder) you would get much higher photo quality than the smaller-sensor ELPH. Difficult to find that combination under $300. Maybe a used Sony RX-100 III? Best wishes.
My wife and I have visited Anza-Borrego rather regularly in the last two decades, and have enjoyed the wildflower blooms. I don't want to deflate your trip idea - but frankly, I've never been overwhelmed by the display of flowers, especially from a photographic standpoint. The flower blooms are beautiful, but they don't quite bang me over the head. But, best wishes for a fine visit.
My wife and I were in Pompeii in October 2016. I carried a Sony RX-100iv but saw folks with all kinds of photo equipment, no tripods however - suggest you leave that behind. Very enjoyable despite the crowds.