The average birder is not an expert on all birds, not a genius and certainly not a magician. When I see a photo of a bird I havn't seen before, the first step is to consult an authoritative text. I use the Audubon, iBird, National Geographic, Lone Pine, Peterson, Sibley and several other guides. If I can't identify the bird, I will try to identify similar or dissimilar distinct characteristics butween the photo and the reference. Any other birders will try to do the same. When enough of get together we will try to properly identify the bird. Saying it doesn't look like an "X" doesn't mean I know what it is. If I'm wrong, point out where I'm wrong. Don't accuse me of playing games by making you guess, don't give me the, "that's my story and I'm sticking to it" line and don't come up with a name that nobody can verify. If you have professional credentials, enlighten us. I have listened to some of the best birders on the west coast discuss the identity of a bird for hours. They may never make a positive identification, but they have educated themselves in the meantime.

I don't know what the bird is, but I think I can show what it isn't. Look at the picture, read my comment and then help us all by telling us what you think it is and why you think so. Don't get offended; get curious. That's how birders learn, and that's how new species are discovered.