Don't most people post process their jpeg shots as well?
Took these at the Tualatin River National Wildlife Refuge near Portland, Oregon
We will have to try those other areas. I liked that part of the coast
btbg wrote:
I know exactly where Wilsonville is. Used to regularly go to Fry's Electronics before the store closed. We live in Central Oregon. Which part of the Oregon Coast were you on?
We were just north of Depoe Bay at the WorldMark, a guest of some friends. We enjoyed the birds: Muirs, Cormorants, Black Oyster Catchers and more. Fun. I included a shot of the Black Oyster Catcher.
I used a Canoon 100-400 mm L IS II lens plus a 1.4 Extender. The combination was 896mm with the 1.6X factor from the R7.
btbg wrote:
Nice. Do you live in Oregon, and if so where?
Yes, we live in Oregon in Wilsonville, just South of Portland.
ialvarez50 wrote:
Where can I see your photos? None of them are in this thread.
I don't post very many, but just a few minutes ago I posted one of an Immature Bald Eagle while trying out my new R7 + 100-400mm L IS II lens +1.4 Teleconverter. Ken
While at the Oregon Coast trying out my new R7 I got this shot of an Immature Bald Eagle. He was chasing a Seagull.
[quote=btbg]I decided to post these images because of recent discussions about whether or not people should use 2x extenders. I know these are birds, but putting them in the bird subsection will prevent the converter discussion.
The photos are taken with a Nikon 400f2.8s lens. The built in 1.4 converter is being used and coupled with a 2x converter. The wren also has a 5mm extension tube for closer focus.
So, the question is are these photos sharp enough, or should people not use the converters and attempt to gain the extra reach by cropping. I believe that any loss of image quality from using the converter is more than offset by the additional reach and the ability to come closer to filling the frame, but I thought it would be interesting to see where any discussion would go. Those of you who believe that no one should use teleconverters, go ahead and have your say. The photos will be posted in the first reply.[/quo
I think these photos look pretty good. I did find that microcalibrating my lens, 2X extender and camera helped greatly to get sharp pictures.
stu352 wrote:
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Craig's list. I have a couple uses in mind where weight isn't an issue. But for just carrying it around hunting for birds or something... My arms got tired just testing it out in my backyard, and I'm not too thrilled about the prospect of the lens hanging from the body mount while carrying the camera with a camera body mounted neck strap.
I'm looking for alternate ideas to carry this thing. What are any of you folks using for heavy lenses?
I managed to score a Canon 100 - 400mm zoom off Cr... (
show quote)
I have used a harness from Cotton Carrier, a company that makes lots of camera carriers that put the weight on the shoulders rather than the neck. I really like mine. Ken