MDI Mainer wrote:
I suspect that within a given brand the quality of their carbon vs aluminum models is really a function of the relative merits and demerits of each material, and weight is one (and perhaps the main) concern, but not the only factor. But I would think that both types represent the same overall quality level of that brand. I can't speak for Vanguard, but I have long had an aluminum Manfrotto and a carbon fiber Manfrotto, identical models except for the construction material, and both are excellent pieces of big and heavy-duty equipment. That's why I bought the travel model Vanguard when I went mirrorless.
Here's a piece on the advantages and disadvantages of these materials. According to the article aluminum is heavier and thus actually preferable and more stable for use in windy, outdoor conditions, which makes sense to me. So unless you'll regularly be carrying the tripod some distance from your bike, a good aluminum tripod may actually serve you (and your wallet) better.
https://shotkit.com/carbon-fiber-vs-aluminum-tripod/I suspect that within a given brand the quality of... (
show quote)
MDI Mainer, that article pretty much seals the deal for me. My needs and conditions of use fit nearly perfectly with the positive aspects of aluminum tripods. Thank you for all of that.
I noticed in that same link a couple of similar items in aluminum with much lower prices. Since I'm not terribly concerned about the weight, do you think the Vanguards in aluminum are just as good as the carbon fiber?
Xpatch wrote:
Don’t put cameras in rear panniers it’s asking for trouble get a handlebar bag or front panniers with shocks off the hub struts. Keep your old tripod and get better lighter cameras or bring a drone along
This is on a motorcycle, not a bicycle, so I'm not likely to give front panniers even a fleeting though. I do carry the DSLRs in a tank bag though as that is the part of a motorcycle with the least amount of vibration. Also not going to go and spend more money for "lighter cameras or bring a drone along." I'm simply not going to spend a ton of money on this as some seem to think is easy-peasy. I guess it is when you are suggesting spending someone else's money.
Not really. The size of the saddlebags determines my maximum folded size and I figure my price range should get me something that is likely 10X better than the $20 Walmart unit that has fallen apart. I'm not looking for professional level equipment and have no delusions of grandeur about my travel pictures. Just want it to be sturdy enough to hold the Elf which is really no problem for just about any tripod, but also want it to hold a DSLR with me close by like someone else mentioned. Not likely to ever be using a long lens on the digital that might create a requirement for a higher level tripod; at least not while on the bike. We have a couple of much larger tripods when on photo safari, but are always in the car for that, making the size requirement here a moot point.
To re-iterate for the sake of saving everyone some time:
Maximum folded length 18".
Minimum extended height 48 to 60" (or more).
Table-tops are of no use to me; already have at least four of those.
Have a budget for a reason; difficult to spend what you don't have.
Thanks BurghByrd. I'll check them out.
Appreciate the links, Jerry, but I'm not really looking for a table-top. Most of the usage has been and will be on the ground with a need to extend to 48 to 60 inches.
Thanks David! You must have been replying while I was typing. I'll take a look at those.
The saddlebags vibrate on all bikes. It's not really the engine of the bike causing the vibration but location of the bags being right over the rear axle. The same conditions would still exist on an electric bike. So, no, I'm not gonna get a different bike.
As for a small tripod not being well suited to hold a DSLR, that is such a small amount of the usage, I'm not terribly concerned about it so long as it could do it with limited use and not for very long periods of time. Even the $17 Walmart pod could do it for the times I needed, but those are the ones that fall apart after a year or two. I'm just tired of constantly having to replace them.
I guess I'll just have to pop in camera shop next chance I get so I can lay hands on a couple that size and decide if they will suit my needs. Problem with that is the nearest big shop to us is 160 miles away in a town I only pass through about once or twice a year.
Greetings all, I'm in need of a small tripod that will fit in the saddlebags of a bike I use frequently. Have been using an el-cheapo from WallyWorld for a couple of years but would rally like to upgrade to a better unit that can withstand constant vibration in the saddlbag. When on the bike I shoot mostly with a Canon Elf 360, but do occasionally carry one or both DSLRs. With the elf the tripod would be mostly used for selfies with the Elf, but with the DSLRs it would need to be substantially better than what I now have. I want to avoid buying another for a good while as the cheap ones prove, you get what you pay for as they fall apart in the very unfriendly environment of a saddlebag. All that said, what would be a good unit to look at with a folded size limit of 18"? Need to keep cost below $150. TIA
spotted this one in Tulia Tx. yesterday.
Here is one from an abandoned pool house in the little community of Bugbee on the north side of Lake Meredith. It is more graffiti than a mural, but well done enough to share here I think.