Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: RLPCEP
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 next>>
Nov 6, 2012 06:50:43   #
In a word, AWESOME!
Go to
Nov 6, 2012 06:48:34   #
That is NICE!!!
Go to
Nov 6, 2012 06:45:12   #
Cool!!
Go to
Nov 6, 2012 06:43:56   #
This may be too simplistic, but possibly shooting in Tiff or Raw will give the resolution for you to crop and enlarge to the equivalent focal length you want using a "smaller" lens.
Go to
Nov 4, 2012 13:24:10   #
Woo Hoo!!
Go to
Apr 6, 2012 17:39:03   #
WVHillbilly wrote:
I really like the John Hancock shot. Thanks for showing.


Ditto that!
Go to
Apr 6, 2012 17:31:23   #
Lovely perspective. Is that squareish object at left center a man-made thing?
Go to
Apr 6, 2012 17:28:01   #
What great eyes you have, Angelo!
Go to
Feb 6, 2012 15:54:47   #
jkaye65 wrote:
RLPCEP wrote:
Have been thinking about trying. Don't want to burn out the sensor, so thought about a double ND filter. Would that be enough? Has anyone tried this? I'd like to know before I trash the sensor.

Thanks.


What kind of result are you seeking by taking pics of old sol? If you are interested in exposing for the surface of the sun, I would recommend a solar filter. The best brand that I have used (and own) are by Thousand Oaks Optics. (See link in a previous post).



I will be using my solar filter in May to shoot the annular eclipse that will be passing through northern Calif.

These filters are designed for viewing the surface of the sun with a telescope. The solar filter only allows 1/100,000th of the light to get through, which allows you to see (and photograph) sun spots. I use one on an 80mm refractor telescope. It would serve the same purpose on a lens. The trickiest part would be attaching it to a lens.

What you can't pick up with a standard solar filter is the sun's prominances (often mistakenly called solar flares). Prominances are the ejected material that looks like flames leaping off the edge of the sun. To see the prominances you need a special filter that only transmits the "hydrogen alpha" light wave.
quote=RLPCEP Have been thinking about trying. Don... (show quote)


Thanks, JKaye.

Looks like the solar filters are affordable, not so much with the H-Alphas. Yikes!
Go to
Feb 6, 2012 15:48:27   #
jkaye65 wrote:
RLPCEP wrote:
Have been thinking about trying. Don't want to burn out the sensor, so thought about a double ND filter. Would that be enough? Has anyone tried this? I'd like to know before I trash the sensor.

Thanks.


What kind of result are you seeking by taking pics of old sol? If you are interested in exposing for the surface of the sun, I would recommend a solar filter. The best brand that I have used (and own) are by Thousand Oaks Optics. (See link in a previous post).


I will be using my solar filter in May to shoot the annular eclipse that will be passing through northern Calif.

These filters are designed for viewing the surface of the sun with a telescope. The solar filter only allows 1/100,000th of the light to get through, which allows you to see (and photograph) sun spots. I use one on an 80mm refractor telescope. It would serve the same purpose on a lens. The trickiest part would be attaching it to a lens.

What you can't pick up with a standard solar filter is the sun's prominances (often mistakenly called solar flares). Prominances are the ejected material that looks like flames leaping off the edge of the sun. To see the prominances you need a special filter that only transmits the "hydrogen alpha" light wave.
quote=RLPCEP Have been thinking about trying. Don... (show quote)


That's what I'm looking for. Where did you find the filter used to capture the prominances? I have a sinking feeling it might be quite pricey. The image with the planets is awesome.
Go to
Feb 6, 2012 15:43:51   #
3Dean wrote:
rpavich wrote:
Ok..now I'm confused.

There are sunset shots galore here on the UHH any day of the week....

No filter used there...

The difference is between pictures with the sun in them, versus pictures of the sun, where the object is to get detailed images of sun spots or other solar activity.

The original poster didn't elaborate on exactly what kind of sun/solar pictures he was interested in. Perhaps he will not actually need any special filters, if they are just casual, quick pictures that include the sun.
quote=rpavich Ok..now I'm confused. br br There ... (show quote)


I'm hoping to capture the sun's corona and the occasional solar flare. I appreciate the info on solar filters. That will take the guesswork out of it. Thanks to all for your comments.
Go to
Feb 6, 2012 13:52:10   #
It's good to know there a few honey bees left. They have become scarce here in Florida.
Go to
Feb 6, 2012 13:49:39   #
Have been thinking about trying. Don't want to burn out the sensor, so thought about a double ND filter. Would that be enough? Has anyone tried this? I'd like to know before I trash the sensor.

Thanks.
Go to
Jan 24, 2012 12:35:23   #
OriginalCyn wrote:
I left my ISO on 1600 by mistake. There is something about this I'm sorta diggin. Thoughts?


Well, it does suggest that the rock fence was in heavy shadow. As is, I like it. It presents as a combination of real and surreal.
Go to
Jan 6, 2012 15:15:08   #
Care to share the technique?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.