Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: MarieLogue
Page: 1 2 next>>
Dec 5, 2013 13:34:32   #
PaulaBrady wrote:
Ok, I'm 54 years old and my husband is two years away from retirement. ( He would make a great photo assistant ...

Paula - Age has nothing to do with it! Desire and determination have everything to do with it. Add to that self-decipline and self-motivation. Then just go for it.

I started a home business when I was 50 or so. At age 60 I took up dog training (having gotten 2 fun little dogs) and began a career in dog agility competition. Now, 15 years later, I am still putting agility championships on my dogs (some are gone now and my baby is nearly 3). I also compete in canine musical freestyle with them (dancing with your dog).

To answer your question, yes! You can do it!




Go to
Dec 5, 2013 13:05:53   #
Age has nothing to do with it! Desire and determination have everything to do with it. Add to that self-decipline and self motivation. Then just go for it.

I started a home business when I was 50 or so. At age 60 I took up dog training (having gotten 2 fun little dogs) and began a career in agility competition. Now, 15 years later, I am still putting agility championships on my dogs (some have gone and my baby is nearly 3). I also compete in canine musical freestyle with them.

To answer your question, yes! You can do it!
Go to
Aug 25, 2013 08:05:58   #
Averar13 wrote:
This is Oscar. I was dog sitting him today. And he fell asleep on the couch and in my spot on the couch. It's a big close up of him. Hope everyone likes him.
Enjoy


I have a Cavalier who looks just like Oscar, another one same color and a little different look, and another that is all the red color. Wonderful little babies. How do you manage to give Oscar back to mom?
Go to
Aug 2, 2013 07:32:56   #
Bruce with a Canon wrote:
Jackson and Sharpton and their ilk will starve if there is no racial tension.
What would they do for a living?


As would Limbaugh and Hannity and their ilk.
Go to
May 31, 2013 13:49:31   #
CurreyPhoto wrote:
An f3.5 lens is always the same lens opening no matter what size sensor you put behind it. The difference is in depth of field. In order to maintain the same degree of blur in the background as the sensor gets smaller the lens opening must get bigger. You will need a faster lens to maintain the same depth of field as the sensor gets smaller. I'm sure there are charts somewhere that set out exactly what this relationship is. However, your picture will be just as bright with an f3.5 lens on a full frame camera as it will with the same lens at f3.5 on a small sensor camera.
An f3.5 lens is always the same lens opening no ma... (show quote)


Thank you for helping me understand this relationship. This makes very good sense to me now.
Go to
May 31, 2013 07:43:53   #
mvyusmc wrote:
Ahoy Marie L,

I've been taking photos since November 1959. Over the years Canon G series cameras proved most dependable as well as economically prudent. Accordingly, based on my personal experience and current reviews, I'd buy a Canon G15 for daily use.

I own a Sony a65 which is a marvel, but expensive. For long zooming I use a Lumix XZ that's several years old. It's a very dependanle camera that produces fin photos. For pocket carry I use a Sony TX7, a low-light marvel that does not have very long battery life.

In sum, bearing in mind that it's the photographer that creates the photo, I'd opt for the Canon G15 as a cost effective camera that performs brilliantly.

All the best,

Martin
Ahoy Marie L, br br I've been taking photos since... (show quote)


Thank you, Martin. I'm looking at the specs for the cameras you mentioned. I do keep coming back to the Canon G15 tho', as I really do like my G6.
Go to
May 31, 2013 07:15:52   #
Kestrel1029 wrote:
Any time. If you have more questions just ask. As for cameras, always comprimises. I did read somewhere that Minimum and Maximum apertures are a factor of the size of the sensor, meaning that if a camera has a small sensor the apertures do not directly correlate to that of a 35mm camera, similar to the crop factor for lenses between a full frame and APS-C sensored DSLR.


I hadn't really understood that relationship before (thanks for your help) but surmised it had to be something like what you describe. I've also noticed the longer zoom cameras have the smaller sensor (at least in the compact arena). Is that done to keep the size of the camera compact? Or is there some technical reason for that?
Go to
May 30, 2013 21:16:58   #
Kestrel1029 wrote:
I thought that perhaps that the Sony may be too big. I found this Canon that may be of what you are looking for. I said this would be a challenge.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/943493-REG/canon_8224b001_powershot_sx280_hs_digital.html


Wow! Thanks. This is getting closer. I looked at the specs and will definitely take a close look tomorrow and see how i stacks up againstt the Sony DSC HX50V. The max aperture of 3.5 is somewhat troubing in both cameras. Many thanks for all your help, Kestrel1029.
Go to
May 30, 2013 20:45:22   #
Wahawk wrote:
Don't eliminate the Canon SX50 from consideration! All mfgs have similar cameras, which would add to the zoom capabilities and not add a lot of weight the SX50 is usually available for about $400-430.
Use the UHH Search and look for the many threads relating to the "SX50" and even the slightly older "SX50"


I find myself revisiting again and again the SX50. It may be too big and heavy for my current needs, but it sure is a tempting camera.
Go to
May 30, 2013 20:40:41   #
Kestrel1029 wrote:
Here is a camera that I thought may work for you. It has an optical viewfinder and a pretty decent zoom. It is bigger than you want but like you said this selection will be a comprimise.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/926281-REG/sony_dsc_hx300_b_cyber_shot_dsc_hx300_digital_camera.html


Thanks so much for that suggestion. I've looked at the specs and that's a lot of camera and a Carl Zeiss lens to boot! I'd buy it in a heartbeat if it weren't so big and heavy. Being realistic with myself, whenever I go somewhere and need a camera, I grab the E900 because it handily slips into my purse.
Go to
May 30, 2013 15:16:21   #
Kestrel1029 wrote:
My main camera right now is my Pentax K20D. I use the Nex 5N as my light/casual carry with me anywhere camera. I love my Pentax but it's big and heavy. I use it when I want to be creative. But when I'm walking the dog and such it is a little bit of a pain to drag the big camera with me.

I think what might help you is to put your needs into a numbered list to see what is most important to you. For example is small size more important than zoom range, or is an optical viewfinder more important than macro ability. Things like that. I know this can be daunting to find the right camera but it can be a lot of fun too.
My main camera right now is my Pentax K20D. I use ... (show quote)


Thanks - great idea. I have a sort of list with "must have" and "would be nice to have". My search has taught me a lot about the technicalities of digital cameras! What I don't need is video. I use my iTouch for that.

:-o :-o :-o :-o
Go to
May 30, 2013 14:56:40   #
Kestrel1029 wrote:
You have a very long wish list. Like most of us you seem to be searching for the perfect camera. As I was reading your post I immediately thought about suggesting the Sony NEX-6, as it has an optical viewfinder and excellent image quality, but it is way over your budget. This search for an upgrade for you will be a difficult one I think. I too upgraded from a Canon G6. I really liked that camera, still have it on the shelf. I upgraded to a DSLR, but I also have a Mirrorless Sony which I like a great deal.

I would suggest going to the sire DPreview.com and using their camera buying guide which allows you to search for a camera with specific features. Good luck with your search, let us know if we can provide further assistance.
You have a very long wish list. Like most of us yo... (show quote)


Thank you, Kestrel1029. Yep! I'm hoping to find the perfect camera but realize it will be a compromise. I'd love to have one of the Sony NEXs but don't feel I'm good enough yet and don't really know where I'm headed, so I can't justify (to myself) that investment just yet. You went straight from your G6 to your Sony mirrorless. I take it you didn't find anything in between the two that suited your needs?
Go to
May 30, 2013 14:20:16   #
Thank you, Wilsondl2. Sounds like I could benefit from an upgrade. I'm trying to consider all the high end P&S and any bridge camera of a decent size and weight (not too big/heavy). Any suggestions other than those I've mentioned?
Go to
May 30, 2013 13:40:47   #
I am not a professional photographer but I love taking photos of my dogs, my flowers, landscapes, the cardinal in my tree, visitors, vacation shots, etc. What I love most is a good, sharp photo. I’ve been fooling around with bokeh and enjoy the experience. I do a lot of cropping, using a dog head from a group of dogs for a christmas card or a bird in the bush in my front yard, for example. I am searching for an upgrade mainly for better quality photos, but also a smaller size than the G6 but no smaller than the E900 which has a nice feel in my hands.

My question is, what will I gain by upgrading? Is 12 mp really better than 9? Is a CMOS sensor a lott better than a Super CCD? I currently own a Canon G6 (7mp, 4x zoom, aperature f2.0 wide, f8.0 narrow, 1/1.8 CCD sensor) and Fujifilm E900 (9 mp, 4x zoom, f2.8 wide, f8.0 narrow, 1/1.6 Super CCD sensor). Both camers are 7-8 years old, very old in digital terms. If I find I really enjoy photography, I will some day buy a mirrorless camera. But first I want to see if I can get really good...which could take years.

Features I feel are important are: image quality, hot shoe, more zoom than I have now (16-20x?), optical stabilization, macro, fast autofocus and shutter, manual focus, plus the usual light, exposure and auto focus settings, flash settings, PSAM, etc. Nice features to have are 16+ mp, viewfinder, articulating screen, RAW format, remote shutter. There may be important features that escape me at the moment. Feel free to mention them. $500-600 isn’t out of the question.

Cameras I’ve been looking at are Nikon P7700, Canon G15 (not much zoom in those two) Sony DSC-HX50V, Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30, Lumix DMC-LX7 (not much zoom), Fujifilm x20. What I’m seeing is that with a decent zoom, the sensor size is decreased. The RX100 has no zoom, no remote, no hot shoe, little zoom, no viewfinder, no macro per se, but great image quality. Seems like I’m going to have to compromise but not so much as the RX 100 would require.

If you’ve made it this far, my question remains, what do I gain by upgrading? And if anyone has a camera suggestion that would meet my needs, please shout out!

Many thanks for taking the time to “listen” to my request.
Go to
Dec 1, 2011 08:25:50   #
I'm new here and trying to learn all I can about photography equipment. I own my own business doing graphic arts and typesetting for the printing trade (20 years). Prior work was in human resources management.
In my spare time I train and compete in agility and freestyle (dancing with your dog) with my 4 Cavalier King Charles Spaniels, the loves of my life! Pictured with me is my special Bravo.

Me and Bravo


Bravo doing agility, coming down dogwalk

Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.