Just take photographs with the equipment you have. The more photographs you take the decision to upgrade either glass or body will become obvious.
"Good photographers have big trashcans", work on this principle and you'll be fine.
Your link does not show photos. It leads to a tutorial about Nikon lenses.
They are available but expensive ($100 +). I'm looking for a "bare bulb" type flash with similar output.
Back in the day when I was a professional medical photographer, my favorite combination, particularly for indoors was a 24mm f2.4 lense and honeywell strobonar as a bounce flash off the ceiling.Product was typically a distortion free, well lit and had few shadows.
I was a professional back in the 70's so I suppose nostalgia is driving the quest for circa 1972 lenses. My fav was the 100mm/f2.5 lenses for head shots, etc
I was given a c.1972 Nikkormat and am wondering where some lense options might be.
I have been unsuccesful in getting the access light to stop blinking. I tried formatting 2 cards (4 GB and 32 GB). Am I missing something ??
It had been a challenge to adapt priciples of radiography, like positioning, to photography. Prior to the adoption of orthodoxy, photographers we urged to promote the surgeon by adapting favorable lighting, shadows, and other efforts to improve the "after" pictures. Adopting standards was necessary.
Digital photgraphy was a real game changer for me. I was all about custom B&W printing for publications, VHS killed the movies (16 mm) too.
Not interested in posting photos. I have been away from the field for a while and am interested in how the field has changed and what is considered 'state of the art. In my own practice I made some films, photographed in surgery and before and after for plastic surgeons.
I was a Medical Photographer for many years. It was pre-digital and all black and white. Are there any medical photogs on UHH ??