Posts for: aguenan
Jan 1, 2015 08:48:21 #
some flower pictures
Dec 15, 2014 19:27:02 #
Dec 15, 2014 09:35:59 #
Dec 14, 2014 10:59:50 #
Nov 25, 2014 12:52:37 #
greymule wrote:
Very cool owl image, but it looks like your camera decided to focus on the tail area, in lieu of the eyes.
Tough to get good focus when there is so much around your subject.
Tough to get good focus when there is so much around your subject.
thanks
Nov 25, 2014 08:14:40 #
Nov 24, 2014 21:32:28 #
tdklex wrote:
Great pics, were these with an SX60 by chance?
no nikon d600 150-500mm sigma
Nov 24, 2014 18:34:08 #
let me know about those pictures thanks
Nov 24, 2014 16:41:21 #
took some pictures around my house let me know
Nov 23, 2014 11:08:31 #
i would like to know which one is better
Nov 22, 2014 14:27:40 #
some more pictures from this morning
Nov 22, 2014 13:54:00 #
this morning took my nikon and the 150-500mm to take those pictures
Nov 22, 2014 13:48:59 #
alfeng wrote:
FWIW. In the past, most 105mm lenses had a closer focusing limit than a typical 135mm lens would have ...
I would think THAT, alone, should be a good reason to choose the 105mm lens.
I would think THAT, alone, should be a good reason to choose the 105mm lens.
thank
Nov 22, 2014 13:48:22 #
Leitz wrote:
:?: The minimum focusing distance of either lens would be largely impractical for portraiture.
thank
Nov 22, 2014 13:47:55 #
Rick36203 wrote:
It would probably depend on your normal shooting distance. The 105DC is highly rated by DXO with your D610. The 135DC has not yet been tested by them. I already have an 85mm for closer portraits and will likely buy the 135DC instead of the 70-200 next. But, that doesn't mean that's the choice for you.
Here is someone's review that owned both.
http://www.davidpinkertonphotography.com/blog/2012/01/17/the-nikon-defocus-control-lenses/
Here is someone's review that owned both.
http://www.davidpinkertonphotography.com/blog/2012/01/17/the-nikon-defocus-control-lenses/
thank so much