Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: manofhg
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 56 next>>
Dec 4, 2023 19:26:29   #
PhotoMono123 wrote:
Take a look at Pixelmator Pro (Apple App Store $25). It is an Apple-only program and it integrates nicely with Apple Photos. If you use the Adobe photo package, you can import a Photoshop or tiff file complete with layers.

Two very highly regarded free programs are DarkTable and RawTherapee.


My son just pulled up a YouTube on DarkTable a few minutes before I saw this post. He likes it and I might start using it too since there will now be someone else with experience that I can lean on.
Go to
Dec 3, 2023 16:37:35   #
I would be interested as well. I have the Adobe Photography Plan and have been using LR for many years. While it is good while it works, I've had more and more problems with it recently. It will quit unexpectedly and then when I open it, it will say it wasn't closed properly and will have to repair the "corrupt" catalog file. Once it does that (not a quick process), sometimes it won't work properly then and I'll have to shut it down and maybe go through that process more than once again. If it does open, then the changes I have made to many of my pictures may not have come back, just as if I hadn't done anything. Today I have been fighting with it remember which photos I have picked and not picked, but all the changes I had done to the picked including crop/straighten, all lighting, etc. none will still be there. All the adjustment sliders will be in the middle. Sometimes the folders that I have created won't show up, but I can easily find them in Explorer, so they still exist. I could go on.......

So, to say the least, I'm frustrated and considering options as well. PS is fine and though I'm not great with it, it seems to work well.
Go to
Nov 4, 2023 07:35:21   #
imagextrordinair wrote:
Easy to do, just look at youtube and search "sky replacement".

Go to "edit" scroll down to sky replacement and you will have some preset choices that are adjustable. You can download free additional skys from Adobe stock. There are youtube tutorials on how to do that also...


Thanks, I'll do that if I get to sky replacement. I may do it anyway for learning the technique.
Go to
Nov 4, 2023 07:34:30   #
selmslie wrote:
That's going to be a challenge.

You will need to do a replacement for each of the seven images or use a very wide angle image of a sky that looks OK for the pano.


Thanks for your help. I may try some sky replacement, but have a few other things to try first.
Go to
Nov 3, 2023 23:30:09   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Dust in the lens wouldn’t look like that. It’s the sensor. And maybe this could have been done with a wide angle lens and cropped, but not with the same detail you can get when stitching.


I think part of the problem, point out by others, was the fact that I used a CPL filter or at least I think that enhanced the problem.
Go to
Nov 3, 2023 23:28:36   #
JFCoupe wrote:
I have had a similar result if I take a series of images with my Olympus 12-100 lens at the wide angle range of the lens. I try to remember to set the lens at about 25 MM (50mm FFE) when I am going to stitich images. I also find that shooting my stitiched pano shots to put the camera in portrait position as well.


All seven of the images I used to make the pano were shot at 200 MM and shot it in portrait position.
Go to
Nov 3, 2023 23:27:13   #
rcarol wrote:
I can't speculate on the cause of the issue but using Photoshop or one of many other available applications, perform a sky replacement.


Yes, I'm considering trying a sky replacement, it will be the first time I've attempted that. Also trying AutoPano Giga as someone suggested. First attempt at that looks some better, but I still need to go back into the individual images and try turning off the lens correction and see if that helps.
Go to
Nov 3, 2023 23:23:52   #
imagextrordinair wrote:
Use all manual settings including a daytime K value for white balance. If the lighting varies between frames you can have issues.

I would just do a quick sky replacement with a similar look in PS to fix this image...


Thanks, I'll try daytime K, but while I've considered the sky replacement, (never done it before), I didn't think about searching for a sky from possibly the same area. Again, I've never attempted a sky replacement either though.
Go to
Nov 3, 2023 06:17:27   #
Orphoto wrote:
Vignetting, sort of. Am guessing you have optical automatic lens correction turned on in your photo editing program. Instead of applying a vignette, it is over correcting and giving you lighter corners. Then it dutifully stitches them together giving you this irregularity.

Go back and manually back off the vignette control until you have even lighting across the frame.


Thanks, that's what I intend to do. I appreciate all those who commented and helped to identify the problem for future shots as well as hopefully make this shot still usable.
Go to
Nov 2, 2023 14:44:46   #
Rongnongno wrote:
Dust on the sensor, nothing to do with your stitching.

Also, this is the wrong section, use the Gallery or the panorama section.


Thanks for the correction of section. I don't believe it is entirely a dusty issue though. I've shot many panos, but never had this issue. I think that I was using a CPL and know I shot at 200 mm.
Go to
Nov 2, 2023 14:42:55   #
cahale wrote:
Those circular patterns are dust on either your lens or your sensor. Also, while stitching yields nice results sometimes, this shot looks like it could have been made with a wide-angle lens and then cropped to produce the panorama effect.


While there are some dust issues in the form of spots that I can take care of, that wasn't causing the vignette effect. The original images were shot at 200 mm.
Go to
Nov 2, 2023 14:41:25   #
bwana wrote:
The biggest problem I have with stitching images is not handling vignetting prior to stitching. I now use AutoGiga Pano which handles this automatically; a godsent!


I'll have to take a look at AutoGiga Pano. Thanks
Go to
Nov 2, 2023 14:40:55   #
R.G. wrote:
CPL filters have been known to produce funny effects with panoramas (and also with wide angle lenses - but in this case I see it was shot at 200mm). Seven shots suggests that the camera angle changed significantly from the start of the sweep to the end.

Another possibility - when you import into your photo editor, does it perform automatic lens corrections? If anything it looks like something may be over-enthusiastically trying to correct vignetting.


LR did recognize that it was using that lens and corrected. I haven't tried turning the auto correction off to see if it changes though. I'll have to remember to NOT use a filter when shooting pans in general.

Thanks
Go to
Nov 2, 2023 14:13:31   #
R.G. wrote:
Did you use a CPL filter or any other kind of filter?


Trying to remember, but if I used anything, it would have been a CPL. I'm wondering if I were to take each image and try to use the vignette tool to remove vignette that I don't even see, if when stitching they would be better.
Go to
Nov 2, 2023 13:36:54   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The 'internal error' is probably due to the image file being too large, in bytes. The documented file size limit is 20MB (mega bytes). 'Stitched' images tend to easily exceed this storage size. You can post an image of any 'width' in pixels. If wider than around 1200px, a thumbnail display will be created, such as above. But, the attachment can be opened and viewed at the full pixel resolution.

None of us can control the vague error messages the UHH site provides. But, we all can understand a 20MB file size limit, and act appropriately. If you need help on how to action this limit, see this link for help.

Recommended resizing parameters for digital images
The 'internal error' is probably due to the image ... (show quote)


Yes, I realized that the first time and there wasn't an error, only the message that the image was too large. After hand palming, I reduced the image to about 14 MB and that is when the internal error arose. The image I have attached here is only about 6 MB, much larger and it only gives the internal error message. The other image I've tried to post is 5.22 MB and here is the error message I get (ends with a comma).

"There was an internal problem processing your attachment. Please go back and try again. If the problem persists, then please contact the administration,"
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 56 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.