mdsiamese wrote:
I take a lot of cat pictures, so I understand your dilemma.
If you take pix of dogs and animals, then yes, you want to advance beyond a point and shoot. The biggest concern with animals is that they don't pose. They move. A lot. And they don't listen. So if it takes your camera a second to take the shot, you miss it because dogs and cats just don't usually hold still. With a DSLR, you can get several frames per second. You won't miss those shots. Makes all the difference in the world! When you compare models, look for the fps setting and try to get the fastest one you can afford, also the fastest focusing camera that you can afford. But really, any DSLR is going to be faster than a point and shoot and will help you take better pet photos.
Before you pick a brand, you need to consider the available lenses. You need to be able to get lenses that open to a wide aperture so that you can get more light in your photos. This is very important with pets because you want to avoid flash. Flash does bad enough things to human eyes, but with dogs and especially cats it just turns them into zombies. Look for lenses with wide apertures, cameras with fast fps, focus and good high ISO performance.
Next, set a reasonable price limit and max it out, be happy with what you buy. The first DSLR I bought was a Nikon D90. I could have afforded a D700, but I thought to myself "you really don't need a full frame D700, so why spend all that money?" I was never really happy with the high ISO performance of the D90, so after 2 months I got the D700 and have been happy ever since. Get the maximum camera that you can afford that makes you happy.
I take a lot of cat pictures, so I understand your... (
show quote)
Good answer. I used to try and take pet pictures in my Veterinary Practice with a point and shoot and could not get it to focus and shoot quick enough. Maybe the point and shoot cameras are better now but a dslr will definitely get the job done. I would not discourage it.