Bruce with a Canon wrote:
It was considered "ART" for an image (maplethorpe) of a crucifix submerged in urine.
It was considered "ART" for an image of the Virgin Mary to decorated with elephant scat.
Some cat, whose name is hardly relevant to bhang sheets of material all over Central Park, NYC.
Thus the definition of art varies widely.
Irrespective what what any one individual might define as art, people are quite free to define it for them selves. IMHO
Excellent point. It .Could not have said it better myself.