Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Pete156
Page: 1 2 next>>
Apr 28, 2020 12:05:30   #
angler wrote:
Nice shots.


Thanks guys, nice to get some feedback. The images were taken with my old Nikon D7100 and the Nikon AF-P 70-300mm VR ED lens a few days ago.
Go to
Apr 28, 2020 07:13:29   #
A few shots of the birds that regularly visit my garden!








Go to
Jul 6, 2014 14:58:55   #
Guys, thanks for all your comments, which have been very informative and useful.
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 14:57:40   #
Armadillo wrote:
Pete156,

This reads like a good choice, it can be used for various tasks beside field photography.

Read the details very closely, and the specifications. If you have the slightest doubt contact the seller and clear up all questions before sending money.

I purchased one like you described and when it arrived there was no flash, and no way to adjust the light on the right/left side. It turned out to be a LED Ring Light. I sent it back to the seller and received a refund in my PayPal account.

Michael G
Pete156, br br This reads like a good choice, it ... (show quote)


Thanks, however in this case because there's very little difference in the price I'll be buying it from Amazon.
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 11:57:49   #
Armadillo wrote:
Pete156,

Your choice of lighting source is dependent on the subject you will capture.

For small still life you can construct, or purchase a lighting tent and use two external strobes.
You can use a LED ring light for stills, but the light level will not be sufficient for live subjects and movement.

For small, live subjects, and possible movement, a Ring Macro flash with twin lamps that are adjustable are much more desirable. (Each lamp can be adjusted for light output for modeling, and the flash duration will be fast enough to stop insect wing movements.)
If you consider a single strobe ring flash you will have much more work trying to obtain shading (modeling) on the subject. In plain language the images may look flat.

If the greater majority of your Macro work will be in a studio type environment consider the light tent and two strobes.

If the majority of your Macro work will be in the field, consider the twin strobe Macro Ring flash.

Michael G
Pete156, br br Your choice of lighting source is ... (show quote)


Thanks, I guess at the end of the day most will be 'in the field' so leaning towards the newer twin strobe ring flash.
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 11:53:33   #
studavis wrote:
Look up and follow Mike Moats


I'm impressed!
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 05:57:58   #
Thanks guys, I was favouring the Neewer tube flash so think I'll go for that.
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 15:25:53   #
I'm considering buying a fairly cheap ring flash for the odd bit of macro photography. I don't want to spend much (£40 - £80 max) for something that I'm probably not going to use very much. My camera is a Nikon D7000 and I currently use a Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro lens for the limited amount of macro photography I do, which is usually still life or shooting insects, bees & butterflies etc.

Anyway, the first problem I hit is whether to go for an LED ring flash or whether to spend a little more and go for a twin tube ring flash. The twin tube flash I'm considering is the Neewer JY-670. With regards the LED ring flash there seems so many to choose from, however I was looking at the AADigital 48 Macro LED Ring Flash.

Is anyone able to point me in the right direction regarding these types of ring flash. My gut feeling is to go for the Neewer one, however any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks
Pete156
Go to
Mar 26, 2014 04:50:20   #
Yes, as I understand it the 454 replaced the 3419 plate, although I'm not sure when the 454 replacement came out.
Go to
Mar 24, 2014 15:38:01   #
Interesting! I think a trip to a few camera shops in the hope that I can get my hands on one or two of these sliders is probably a good idea.
Go to
Mar 24, 2014 13:44:53   #
Okay, thanks guys. I'm still leaning towards the Manfrotto 454, however will look around the internet a bit more to see if I can find some more reviews/comparisons etc.
Go to
Mar 24, 2014 09:57:32   #
I've started to look at options for some macro photography and was thinking of investing in the Manfrotto 454 micro-positioning plate, however there does seem to be so many similar type plates out there for far less money.
I realise that it's often the case of the more you pay the better quality you get but can anyone suggest a better alternative to this 454 plate.
The camera I'm looking to support is my Nikon D7000 with the Nikon 105mm micro lens. The tripod I use is a Manfrotto tripod, hence I'm considering the Manfrotto plate.
Any alternative suggestions would be appreciated.
Go to
Sep 28, 2013 13:12:39   #
Thanks for your reply regarding your club easels. I may contact the secretaries as you suggested, however before I do someone within our club has now come up with a cheap suggestion which we're going to try first. Thanks again, Peter.
Go to
Sep 27, 2013 12:42:38   #
At our camera club we have an easel which we use for judging individual prints and also guest speakers use it when they give talks.
However, because the lighting in the room we use isn't very good we would like to fix some lighting to the easel to light up the prints better, either clamped to the top so the lighting is directed downwards or to perhaps fix something to the base which would direct the lighting upwards onto the print.
Could anybody offer any advice as to which lighting option would show the prints off best (from above or below) and also which type of bulb/tube would be better. My first thoughts regarding the bulb would be a fluorescent daylight tube (temp 6000k), however I'm not a lighting expect.
Thanks
Go to
Jul 4, 2013 07:08:04   #
Okay, thanks. I think perhaps a bit more research is needed.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.