Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mikegreenwald
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 102 next>>
Apr 16, 2024 18:54:53   #
Retired CPO wrote:
I agree with you. I don't like to criticize folks work, even if they invite it. But I am guilty of saying something somewhat negative about egregious things like WAY tilted horizons, etc. Especially to newer members. I try to couch it in a humorous way in an attempt to not hurt feelings. I haven't had any complaints yet, but I keep it to a minimum anyway.


Does "CPO" mean "Chief Posting Officer"?
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 18:50:47   #
Most of the larger print shops have roll paper printers that print up to 42" by 100'. The paper types are more limited than for sheet paper though.
I have one pano that I printed as six adjacent 30" by 42" prints, displayed next to one another on two walls (90º corner), to excellent effect and more easily handled than a single 13' wide print.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 18:42:47   #
I've become a convert to my late model cell phone for mid range travel pictures, including later enlargement to up to 30"x40" prints. Unless you're interested in wildlife or macro, I'd be happy. Like any other camera, you have to be thoroughly familiar with it to get good photos!
Samsung, Apple, and other 'phonesl have excellent photo capabilities.
Go to
Apr 16, 2024 18:29:34   #
Some years ago I was caught in a hailstorm, summertime, well above tree line in Colorado and about two miles from my open (!!) car. I had a Rollei 6008i camera and 90mm(?) lens. Leaving my own problems aside, both lens and camera were soaked and inoperable. Some of the lens elements delaminated, and the shutter and parts were clearly and obviously impaired. I sent it to two repair shops independently; both said it would be cheaper to replace than to repair. I tried a home repair of camera (not the lens) in a lightly heated vacuum box plus disassembly and cleaning, and I sort of got the camera working. The optical rangefinder was a little off afterwards, and the shutter speeds were suspect. I used it occasionally with other lenses, but never again for anything important. I eventually gave it away.
I bought a Mamiya 7 with 43 , 80, and one other lens ("loaned" to a friend who moved away with my lens). I rarely use it now because of the inconvenience and expense.
Go to
Feb 28, 2024 20:14:35   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Probably thinking about that unlevel horizon and how it seems like a Photo Gallery post.


Actually, the motorcycle is leaning that way, and tilts the horizon.
Go to
Feb 21, 2024 09:40:16   #
I've had the Sigma in the past, but sold it because it was slow and clumsy to use, though certainly a sharp lens when used on a tripod. I have the Canon RF 100-500 now, and overall it's a great lens, though the f7.1 is sometimes a handicap.
If I were to make the choice today, I'd buy the Canon 200-800. I'm well covered in the shorter focal lengths, and don't feel strongly enough to make the change.
Still, it boils down to what your usual targets are, and how quickly you can change gears between manufacturers when working quickly in the field.
Go to
Jan 24, 2024 14:31:53   #
To read many of my manuals, I’d need to learn half a dozen new languages.
Go to
Jan 24, 2024 09:56:44   #
MJPerini wrote:
With all due respect, you are asking the wrong question. Every accomplished photographer learns that it is the picture that is important. Pictures occur everywhere you need to be able to Get the picture. That means knowing how to add light when necessary. It is totally fine to have a preference for natural light , or studio light but you will invariably find some situations where you are out of your comfort zone.
Raising ISO is not a substitute for good lighting. It can certainly help and we all use it sometimes. But most times a lower iso and a reflector will give better results
If you love studio lighting and find yourself out of the studio? Add a little flash, turn the subject if you can , or change your position.

People with strong opinions about doing it only one way, are often uncomfortable in their ability to modify light to get the picture.
Personally I do lots of natural light photography, but i always carry a reflector and a small flash and 5 or 10% of the time they make the picture.
I started as a studio photographer. If the picture is good , the picture is good…. We don’t first ask what type of lighting is “better”.

Good photographers are problem solvers in search of good pictures.
There certainly are times when you can’t add light or use a reflector say bird or wildlife photography, but if you look at the work of people who are good at that work you will quickly see that they have Positioned themselves relative to the subject and light to give the best chance. That is very much a lighting skill.
This is a long answer to what seemed a simple question, it is offered in an effort to be responsive to the intent of your question.
Good Luck
With all due respect, you are asking the wrong que... (show quote)


Well said!!
Go to
Jan 24, 2024 09:52:33   #
I long ago learned the truth of Burks’ discussion.
However, there is so much in many of most manuals that it’s impossible to remember everything. My workaround when learning to use a new piece of equipment, is to take a task that is common for me, read about only that task, then go out and practiced with it in innocuous situations until I understand it thoroughly. Then and only then, tackle the next task.
It rarely pays to go out to shoot an important subject without first learning to use ALL the equipment to be used (camera, lens(es), lights, reflectors, time of day, subjects, time of year …..).
When all else fails, read the manual? NO: read it first, and you probably won’t fail.
Go to
Jan 22, 2024 10:05:47   #
Hawkeye60 wrote:
I would love to know if there’s anyone who has experience in photographing their trips or excursions while riding a motorcycle in the States or abroad. Motorcycling is one of my favorite hobbies and I dabble in photography, but I am interested in going beyond action cameras and vlogging. Also, I have considered drone photography and footage, but I lack experience in that aspect of photography. All suggestions, ideas and tips are welcomed!
I would love to know if there’s anyone who has exp... (show quote)


My wife and I spent three weeks in Europe on one bike (Honda 1100) several years ago. We each used one saddle bag for clothing, and the top box had a few small items of nicknacks plus a Canon FF DSLR and several lenses, but no tripod. Laundry every night in hotel or hostel; also carried a tiny retractable clothesline. Rain gear was needed, which squeezed the clothing space when we weren’t wearing it. Intercom was attached (not the modern built in type), but a huge plus to be able to talk while riding. Few photos when under way by cell phone, which she probably should have used more. Cell phone cameras then were poor and shots often blurred from speed or vibration. Most of the travel was in mountainous or hilly country, and it was a ball! Lots of side trips, and fortuitous sites for visitation and/or photos.
We have a great slide show that we look at occasionally, and two lovely wall hangers (more if I had more wall space). If I were younger, I’d happily do it again with my R5 and a range of lenses.
Go to
Jan 19, 2024 14:28:52   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The Rules exist whether you follow them or not.


Try to explain that to the trooper that stops you for speeding
Go to
Jan 19, 2024 14:09:22   #
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
Some photograhers have a natural inborn talent for composition- that is the placement of subjects within the frame. Some folks have a natural inborn talent while others have to learn some basic element to develop a knack or talent. There are othere elements that have to do with composition such as the use of color, lighting, and tone, and the strategic use of leading lines.

There are "rules" and guidelines that are useful in teaching and learning the basic elements. There are the rule of thirds and the golden section but those are the tip of the iceberg. There are complex theses written with, intricate diagrams, grids, and diagrams on cameras' viewing screens. All of these resources are helpful but perhaps not practical in workg in the field. I have a book that not only has all those diagrams but breaks them into mathematical and geometric formulas. It is some interesting reading but not very useful when shooting wildlife. a sports event, a landscape in sub-freezing weather, or a riot. You can the the book with you but you can subconsciously apply some of the theory.

What you boil things down to the basic reason for the concept is to lead the viewers' eyes to the motif of your images.

Personally speaking, I do not confine my work to one format, aspect ratio, size, or shape unless it is for a commercial job with a particular layout. I find that some subjects work well in a square rectangular, panoramic, ir even round or oval final disposition and shoot accordingly. Some subjects do well in a tight composion and some benefit from negative space. I consider leading lines, foreground framing in traditional approaches, and oftentimes breaking a "rule" will make for a stronger image.

If you are satisfied with your result, composition-wise, a good experiment is to see if they conform to any of the classic rules. You might find out that you have a natural talent. If you are dissatisfied, study some of the classic concepts and see what improvement you can apply.

The great advantage of digital photoghay is that you do not have to go through tons of film and hours of darkroom work to experiment. You can not only bracket exposures but "bracket" compositions aswell- try various points of view, varying focal lengths, leaving more or less space around your subject, and consider various aspect ratios, and crops. Develop your individual style and approach.

I kid you not about that book. Here is one of the diagrams that illustrate the strongest point in a composiition- enough to drive one crazy.

There is no magical formula. Study some of the foundational material, apply it when you can, see if you like the results, break a few rules, and at the end of the day it waht looks good to YOU!
Some photograhers have a natural inborn talent for... (show quote)


My feelings exactly. I’ve known quite a few artists and photographers - my wife among them - who instinctively shoot excellent photos with no knowledge of the rules, and little if any interest in learning them.
Go to
Jan 14, 2024 06:00:31   #
WOW! Shots like these, particularly closeups of the rust, make this site worthwhile.
Thank you.
Go to
Jan 14, 2024 05:57:57   #
Having lived in that area for eight years, I believe the best are amongst those mentioned above. Watkins Glen, Taughannock Fall SP, The entire Finger Lakes area - particularly the wine country around Hammondsport (not just about the wineries - the lakes and hilly, scenic countryside are beautiful! It’s hard to go wrong. I’m not much for museums, but the Glenn Curtis museum on a rainy day might be a great break. The area is full of excellent restaurants too.
Distances are small enough to plan around your interests, with only moderate attention to geography. Find a centrally located motel to stay at, to avoid continuous packing/unpacking. I like Skaneateles at the north end of the lake of the same name, but it doesn’t qualify as central.
Go to
Jan 14, 2024 05:57:08   #
Having lived in that area for eight years, I believe the best are amongst those mentioned above. Watkins Glen, Taughannock Fall SP, The entire Finger Lakes area - particularly the wine country around Hammondsport (not just about the wineries - the lakes and hilly, scenic countryside are beautiful! It’s hard to go wrong. I’m not much for museums, but the Glenn Curtis museum on a rainy day might be a great break. The area is full of excellent restaurants too.
Distances are small enough to plan around your interests, with only moderate attention to geography. Find a centrally located motel to stay at, to avoid continuous packing/unpacking. I like Skaneateles, but it doesn’t qualify as central.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 102 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.