Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: uaeluor1949
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21 next>>
Aug 12, 2019 09:10:30   #
I have the AF version not the AF-S, I was told that using a TC would damage this lens. Is anyone using a TC with the AF version?
Go to
Jul 21, 2019 04:55:30   #
Thank you rook2c4, I'll check it out.
Go to
Jul 20, 2019 21:53:59   #
Sorry, I forgot to mention I have a Mac.
Go to
Jul 20, 2019 20:42:09   #
I did a search here and was surprised that there were no discussions. I'm sure that someone here has converted SWF images. I looked online for converter reviews but they were not in-depth enough for me. I'd like to hear your thoughts. Thank you.
Paul
Go to
Jun 20, 2019 10:09:45   #
Sorry, I can't sell or give away something that I believe is defective. It would be cheaper to buy one that is working perfectly than to get my camera fixed.
Go to
Jun 20, 2019 09:52:10   #
I don't know what formula people use to get their keeper rate. I don't just take one or two shots of a subject. I measure my keeper rate not by how many photos are sharp but by how many I'm willing to print. If you think that's a bad keeper rate too bad, I'm happy with what I have. I finally moved from DX to FX. My lenses may be older but they are FX & are in perfect shape.
Go to
Jun 20, 2019 05:23:50   #
LCD wrote:
that faulty camera still made you a better photographer.


So true
Go to
Jun 20, 2019 05:21:54   #
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
You are talking about an "uncontrolled experiment"- let me explain.

You may have accidentally became a "lousy photographer" and not because you are a bad guy, not knowledgeable, or anything bad. If you were getting constantly poorly focused images you may have had a defective camera to begin with, you may have unknowingly experienced an eyesight issue, or may have not been using the autofocus functions on your camera properly. You may have misconstrued camera movement or subject movement blur as focus shortcomings? The only way you could have actually diagnosed the problem was to run controlled tests by manually focusing on a target and then comparing the results to an auto-focused image. Mounting the camera on a sturdy tripod and making certain that the shutter speed was appropriate for any action is another test. If you did not conduct any of these tests and just randomly or indiscriminately sent the camera out for refurbishing- this may have made matters worse and the actual issue was never addressed. If there was no improvement in performance after the repair, you should have taken it up with the repair service immediately.

Even if your old camera was in perfect working order, it is still an old camera and will have lost any significant trade-in or resale value. It is not a bad thing that technology progresses- consider it an advantage to be able to avail yourself of better up-to-date gear.

If you are still finding an alarming percentage of out of focus or blurred images with your new camera, make certain that the autofocus function is set for the appropriate mode for the type of work you are doing- check into the manual and the camera's menu for these settings. Brush up on your depth of field theory especially when working with longer focal lengths at wide apertures and shooting wildlife etc.

Your new camera, if used judiciously, should provide excellent sharpness. Some folks around this forum are so preoccupied with acutance that one might think they are exhibiting their images on the Jumbotron at the local arena or producing photo-murals and billboards. Many are never even making substantially large prints. Some folks are quick to categorize older gear as junk, paperweights and door stops, etc, while in fact, they were decent in their era and have just outlived their usefulness and have been replaced by better offerings from the engineers, manufacturers and the retailers.

Enjoy your new camera. If you have time, run a few controlled tests as I have outlined and make sure everything is OK while the warranty is still in force. If it all checks out, just watch your technique as to AF settings, DOP, and shutter speed. Make certain that the AF is set to hone in on your subject and lock the focus in before re-composing. If you are handholding your camera in difficult conditions, a good investment might be in a sturdy grip, L-bracket or monopod. These accessors help reinforce steadiness and in maintaining precise focus
You are talking about an "uncontrolled experi... (show quote)


Thanks for the great advice. I should have described how I shoot:
I have used a tripod in the past, use the timer sometimes, manual mode & adjust for the lighting. Some times the photos were out of focus sometime sharp. I guess I'm too dense to think of returning the camera for a thorough refurb early on. I thought that when you refurb a camera they replace every moving part & check everything, that's why I thought that the problem was me. I'm not having any problem with the D850 even when I'm using an 80-400mm hand held & I have been able to use slower shutter speeds. I'm 69 & on medication for slight tremors. Years ago I used an Nikkormat with a 50mm 1.4. I went through many hundreds of rolls without having many blurry photos. I doubt very much that I'll ever use the D200 again, I'm so excited using the D850 that I'm trying to get out more. Thank you for your gentle instructions.
Go to
Jun 19, 2019 06:21:25   #
Doel wrote:
Lovely photo.. Good job


Thank you.
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 19:26:20   #
Retired CPO wrote:
If you can't get good photographs with a D200 you might want to look at the photographer, not the camera.


That was my opinion of my photography for a long time. I have great respect for Nikon just not for the repair facility.

All I know now is that one lens didn't work with the D200 but works great with the D850. I shoot the same basic settings with both cameras & my keeper rate greatly increased with the D850.
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 17:07:49   #
rook2c4 wrote:
they are much too busy pushing their latest models to be concerned about the auto-focus accuracy of a model from a long time ago.


It's not the camera I'm asking about. I went to a Nikon authorized facility to get quality work. I didn't get it. If I can't trust a Nikon authorized facility then who can I? I thought the world of the D200 as I thought the problem was with me. This is the only problem I have ever had with Nikon. I don't care about the camera as I have the best now & I'm enjoying it.

I know you're right "Nikon wouldn't care" about the camera.
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 14:28:12   #
I'm sure there are but I can't donate something defected.
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 14:26:21   #
I haven't thought to display my cameras. I have an Argus C3 (my 1st), a Polaroid 210, Bell & Howell 134, Bell & Howell Auto Load, Nikkormat EL & EM, a P900 & a D200 with assorted lenses (macro to telephoto). I guess I have to buy a curio cabinet. Yea the memories ahhh
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 13:58:02   #
Thanks E.L. I'm quite content with my new camera & since the old camera is not worth anything I'm not selling it nor will I give it away. I won't bother doing experiments with the old one. I'll pay more attention to settings etc.
Go to
Jun 18, 2019 12:29:02   #
You're right Foathog, my son has a D5000 and that was too much for me at once that's why I got a dinosaur. Yes I love the D850. I recommend a D850, it's well worth the cost. (even with older lenses).
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.