Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: psurg
Aug 20, 2021 11:56:47   #
Boney wrote:
I would like some input regarding mirror-less cameras versus our old reliable DSLR friends. I am 81 and physically going slowly down hill. I own a D7000 and a D300E. My walk around lenses are an 18-300mm for the D7000 and a 28-300mm for the D800E. I have many other lenses but these are left on these cameras. As time goes on I am getting weaker and a little shakier. My main reason for personally moving to mirror-less is to end up with a capable system but much lighter than my present systems.
From what I can tell the weight issue is not a big one, the mirror-less system are still fairly heavy. The image stability is now in the camera and it functions by moving the focal plane rather than some element in the lenses. What about focusing? With the mirror-less system does one totally depend on the built in auto focus for all focusing, or can one focus using the LCD viewing screen, similarly to the penta-prism finder? Can you see the image well enough to focus sharply with it? Since the image stabilization is in the camera shouldn't all lenses now be much or at least somewhat less expensive? They don't appear to be cheaper. Now this could be due to the cost of developing a new line of lenses.
With just these features being a little different I don't see a big advantage moving to the mirror-less world over what I now own.
If some of you folks with mirror-less can give me some feedback I would greatly appreciate.
I often end up shooting in situations that only a DSLR could accommodate, such as shooting through a different optical system, i.e. telescopes, microscopes and really different optical situations.
If most of ones shooting is outside, how well does using an LCD screen work out for you. I have trouble using them in bright sunlight, i.e. my mobile phone. Hard to focus using the screen under these circumstances..
I would like some input regarding mirror-less came... (show quote)


Most , if not all,DSLR cameras have a mirror lift knob which converts the camera to so called mirrorless,This also occurs when one shoots a video.So why spent money on a solely mirrorless.Some of my best photos were taken
taken with Nikon D90,which i bought many yrs ago.I could not tell if they were taken with my newest Nokon D 850
or canon 5DIV.I am not buying any mirrorless camera .I am using mostly canon hfs 200 sx,a very light weight camera for travel and everyday use.Picture quality depends on lenses and light.This is just my feeling after spending thousands of dollars on all sorts of cameras and lenses.
Go to
Mar 5, 2014 08:32:12   #
In regards to the lenses that I am trying to sell they are
A]24 -70 2.8l non stabilised only 2yrs old and used for 4 -5 times in mint condition with all the accessories for 1100.
B]400mm 2.8 l version 2 IS plus polarising filter for $10,000.with plastic case and the original drop in filter.These lenses were bought from aldorama and b&h and had
us warranties although these warranties being expired as
these lenses are 2 yr old.
Go to
Mar 1, 2014 09:59:00   #
I always had a filter on my lens.My daughter dropped her
lens accidently and only the filter shattered.It saved the
lens.It saved her from buying a new lens.A good quality
filter has not noticeably affected the IQ.
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 11:25:34   #
which is the best place to get the most reasonable price for your camera lenses
that are like new and hardly used at all.I like to sell a canon 24-70 f2.8l and
a canon 400mm f 2.8 l with all the accessories.What should I expect to get
from the buyer.thanks
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 12:22:32   #
Ron,your best bet for control of the camera on a monopod is a
PISTOL grip.There is a ball head with a grip which would
ease up the camera for composing.
Go to
Oct 19, 2012 12:15:12   #
Thank you Roberts for explaining to me the factors involved
in the light transmission through a lens.I have realised
that it is not as straight forwards as i had thought.With the
information that you gave me and the explanation was much
more satisfying than what i got from the canon lens corporation.I am however disappointed that this lens which
i bought for indoor sports and other activities [where flash
is not allowed]may not give the expected exposure without
tweaking some other less desirable adjustments.Thank you
so much for you time and explanation.I would also like to thank UHH for having this forum.
Go to
Oct 18, 2012 22:42:08   #
Thank you robert for responding to my enquiry.I also went to the web site and tried to grasp some information.Thanks for
introducing me to that site.I did talk to canon service and
the gentleman told me that since 400mm f 2.8 lens has so many more elements in it,therefore,there is much more light fall off compared to 70-200mm lens.However my concern is that the
light fall off makes the 400mm f2.8 equivalent to 5.6.This would mean that I would have to jack up the iso from 800 to
3200 to get the same amount of exposure.This would likely add more noise in the picture.400mm 2.8 is like 200mm 5.6 with
respect to exposure although the image is magnified due to longer focal length of 400mm lens.Does that make the 400mm 2.8 really a 2.8 lens or 400mm 5.6?
Go to
Oct 18, 2012 12:31:55   #
when using the same object and same amount of light in the
same environment,the image is 3x darker with 400mm lens.
I would be interested in your view.Is this to be expected?The
tv and aperture being the same the iso had to be increased
3x to achieve the same exposure with the 400mm f2.8 v11
as compared to 70-200mm f2.8 is v11.Your response would
be appreciated.This is a great forum and i have recommended
it to others.
Go to
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.