Posts for: erniehatt
Apr 24, 2015 00:38:17 #
Apr 22, 2015 22:59:16 #
Apr 22, 2015 17:22:43 #
these have been very absent for a long while in our garden, but got lucky with this beauty, one second it ws here next gone.
Apr 7, 2015 14:32:18 #
Magicman wrote:
Don't go with eye fi cards. Mine are in drawer. Don't work well and shows that the camera is out dated
Agree, mine still records images, and shows them on camera, but will not allow me to transfer them.
Apr 7, 2015 00:56:46 #
rsumners wrote:
Very tempting. Does the camera have WiFi?
The GXT comes with WiFi and a nice little program to connect it to your smartphone or tablet, works great
Apr 6, 2015 16:28:55 #
melismus wrote:
Neither do Canon, Nikon, Panasonic. They are all in the lenses.
Not completely correct, the GX7 has.
Apr 6, 2015 15:32:44 #
I have the Panasonic GX1 and the GX7, both excellent choices.
Apr 3, 2015 15:44:47 #
Mar 25, 2015 08:54:35 #
mwsilvers wrote:
Again you continue to display your complete ignorance of the subject. There is hardly an image captured by anyone on any camera, professional or amateur that can't be made to look better in post processing. It comes down to a question of whether you want to let your camera do the post processing based on the availability of limited user settings, or whether you want complete control over the results. In either case, make no mistake about it, post processing is taking place!
there you go again, trying to read something entirely different into what I wrote, I don't see anything of what you are saying in my quote. Of course most images can be improved in post, and that includes Jpegs and you would be surprised at just how far you can push them. Fair enough if you get it wrong in camera to the extent that highlights and shadows are clipped, there is not much you can do about it, that could also be said for raw.
Mar 25, 2015 08:02:38 #
mwsilvers wrote:
First you cannot get similar results from jpegs. Second, implying that those who shoot raw either don't know how to set up their cameras to get a correct exposure or are just lazy, besides being ludicrous and insulting, displays your complete ignorance of the subject. Therefore we can safely ignore anything you have to say.
Before you go shooting your big mouth of, you should read whats written. My words were raw is for those who do not have the time to set up the shot, meaning, when they need to get the shot very quickly. Yes I did say for lazy people, how often do you hear, mI just snap it off, I can fix it in post, that spells LAZY
Mar 25, 2015 07:23:51 #
Jim Bob wrote:
Thank you for the added beating.
Sorry but that is not completely correct, if you open you jpeg in photoshop and immediately save as a tiff, and keep that file safe, you have no problem. You can then go ahead and edit the jpeg, if you then use saveas and give it another name there will be no deterioration, If say my file is named Collie I would name it as Collie+ then if I do further work on it I saveas collie++, when I have a copy I like I delete the rest.
You only get deterioration when you keep saving over the same image.
I have jpegs that are years old and they have not changed.
Mar 25, 2015 07:06:55 #
TheDman wrote:
Quick and dirty example. First one is the RAW.
But you can get a similar result from the jpeg, and if you expose it correctly in the first place very little processing would be needed. for me raw is for those who do not have the time to set things up correctly, or are just to lazy,
Mar 21, 2015 17:19:27 #
Mar 21, 2015 17:17:36 #
cosmo54 wrote:
Hand held? Excellent! And I LOVE the word chuffed.....I'm going to start using it :-)
Thanks, the word chuffed is an old English saying for pleased.
Mar 20, 2015 22:47:47 #
While trying out my new Panasonic GX7, I saw this little visitor, and tried a shot, only had the 14-42 kit lens on so I am quite chuffed with the result, being as I have a lot to learn about the enormous amount of features this little camera holds.
