Often yes but not quite daily and clearly less than the hourly left wing circle jerk routine for Trump. I do my best to keep up.
Does anyone remember hearing or reading much about this???
New details emerge on Biden's Iran envoy-in-limbo
The mystery surrounding sidelined Biden administration Iran envoy Robert Malley is deepening, amid revelations by two top GOP lawmakers that Mr. Malley may have downloaded “classified documents” onto his cellphone, which was then apparently hacked by Iranian cyber operatives.
Mr. Malley, a longtime Democratic diplomat who was a key architect of the Obama administration’s 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, has had his status in limbo since the State Department stripped his security clearance, suspended his pay and put him on administrative leave nearly a year ago, pending a review of allegations he mishandled classified information.
Republicans on Capitol Hill say the Biden administration has kept them in the dark about the case, but they’ve done their own digging. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul and Sen. James E. Risch, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s ranking Republican, sent a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken this week asking him to confirm that Mr. Malley’s security clearance was suspended “because he improperly t***sferred classified U.S. government information to a personal email account and/or device that is not authorized to store such information.”
The letter, first obtained and reported on by Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin, asks the State Department to confirm the lawmakers’ belief that “a hostile cyber actor was able to gain access to [Mr. Malley’s] email and/or phone and obtain the downloaded information,” and questions whether the alleged cyber actor is affiliated with the “Iranian military or intelligence services.”
Here's the original article -
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/aug/17/mystery-deepens-bidens-iran-envoy-limbo-robert-mal/
Robertl594 wrote:
Well, I agree with you on Rac making us all feel smart by comparison to his moronic, sophomoric and puerile posts. The problem is that he is such a waste of valuable time.
If Rac's comments are so bothersome that you feel he's wasting your time, why do spend precious time responding? Just curious.
With advisors (aka "handlers") such as this, we have a pretty clear picture as to why Biden doesn't know what he's doing most of the time.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1895545/jared-bernstein-money-joe-biden
robertjerl wrote:
Ah, couldn't hold a real job so his family got him elected to office so they didn't have to support him and his family.
(PS - This representative is a woman).
pendennis wrote:
The Theory of Natural Se******n is accepted because there is evidence to prove that beings ascended to the "top of the food chain" because they did things that kept them alive when others of their species died because they didn't adapt. That does not prove that a deity "oversees" that process. Natural se******n, per se, means that there is no "grand plan". Life evolves because beings did/do things that the rest of the crowd didn't. When mankind first crawled out of the forest and stood on two legs, the survivors were the ones who didn't stand upright immediately and get hammered by a big raptor, or they evaded the predatory cat others didn't.
It also goes back to simpler life when a genetic deviation allowed a creature to avoid being eaten because it sensed a shadow and got out of the way.
All of this happened millions (billions?) of times with the survivors adapting to their environment, ensuring that genetic mutation survived. There was no "guiding" hand that maintained control. It was/is all random.
The Theory of Natural Se******n is accepted becaus... (
show quote)
I am not discounting or ignoring evolution. My point is that the Theory of Natural Se******n does not disprove God overseeing the process.
Another rocket scientist!!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/democrat-representative-said-women-can-t-have-guns-because-safeties-are-too-complicated/ss-BB1lUE3I?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=8022fdd8c4f24432cab4b5c76726e455&ei=66#image=2
The video is about 8 minutes long but very informative.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/death-pool-discovered-at-the-bottom-of-the-sea-that-kills-everything-immediately/ar-BB1lXgo0?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=8022fdd8c4f24432cab4b5c76726e455&ei=45
pendennis wrote:
It's not irrational to claim that something does not exist, when there's no evidence to the contrary.
I assert that there are no leprechauns. If you believe there are, you are bound by logic to prove that there are. It's no more complicated than that.
I can assert that there was no creation by a superior being. I don't have to provide prove that there wasn't. You, on the other hand, have to prove that a superior being created everything and ignore the science of evolution.
Theistic evolution is the belief that God controls evolution and that He designed the universe and the Earth to be this way for a purpose. If Darwin’s theory of natural se******n is to be accepted, it is because God oversees this natural process - God created nature along with everything else.
srg wrote:
That's not the way logic works. If your side posits the existence of something that can only be imagined, then the burden of proof is on your side.
No. In this faith-based discussion, the way this works is I don't have to prove anything to you, nor do you have to prove anything to me, unless as someone said you can convince me to believe what you believe in. I know the position non-believers have and as I said, I'm not wasting time trying to convince you otherwise. That said, I'd still like to get an answer on what the "proven science" is that pendennis referred to. If this is true, then it shouldn't be too hard to prove. Perhaps you can help him out.