When shooting rivers and waterfalls from oblique angles the subject often tends to look like it is running down hill, which of course it is, but the photo just looks odd to me. leveling the river bank or lip of the falls only works sometimes. This photo was shot from a level platform ten feet above water level and the camera was leveled using the LCD "level Tool" on the D600. Comments?

Sandstone Falls, WV

I keep a couple of rubber bands in my bag to use as grippers on each filter when trying to separate them. Best not to stack but sometimes necessary with ND and CPL.

Agreed, I've used 16-35 F4 a lot and Love it.

About the 24-70 specifically - many use that as their primary, most often used landscape lens (see MT Shooter and many others). The 14-24 and 16-35 are also basic to landscapes.
When considering the 24-70, the newer recommendations around the web seem to lean to the 24-120 but even those who recommend it still confess to using the 24-70.
I've been scratching my head over this for a couple of weeks before pulling the trigger on one or the other. Having both in front of me only deepens the quandary.
So . . . any suggested cure for this NAS attack?

I'm leaning to the 24-120 for newer design, and VR and greater range.

14-24? 16-35? 24-70?
Why has no one mentioned the 24-120 F4?
Both T.Hogan and Photography Life sites are currently recommending that for D800 users. - UNLESS weatherproofing is crucial to your shooting style.
I know the 24-120 is not as robust but I have that lens and a 24-70 sitting in front of me trying to make a decision. Consensus between myself and another very competent shooter is the 24-120 is sharper and the VR allows a higher hit rate.
I already have the 16-35 and 70-200 VRII.
Opinions?

The 70-200 will allow you to also get really good shots of the kids. Pretty hard with a 150-500.

I have used the Lowepro Flipside 400 AW for a year and it still looks new. It comes in different sizes - the 300 and 500 as well. It does exactly what you are asking. Slip off the straps, swing it in front and the pack becomes a shelf in front of you, suspended by the substantial hip belt. It works and can carry more than you want:
D800, 16-35, 24-70, 70-200, 300 f4, 105 micro, 50, 2 TC's. and cards, cords, remote trigger, flash, bandana, gloves, water, snacks. All that weighs in at 28 pounds. The pull out tripod carrier works and the all-weather cover gets used in any wet, sandy, muddy conditions to allow putting the pack down and keeping
it clean and/or dry.
Of course for field work, I would never carry that many lenses at once. It also serves as my only storage locker at home. The shoulder straps can be secured in front of the pack, the hip belt reversed around the bottom of the pack and it becomes a very neat camera bag with a large carry handle on top.

http://products.lowepro.com/product/Flipside-400%20AW,2116.htm

Watch the video, it explains it all.

I recently ordered the Flipside 500 since I am obviously maxing out the 400 for storage. It is half again as large, holds all the above, two bodies with even more batteries and stuff, and my Macbook Air computer with room to spare.

Especially love the dove in the tree top. Seems he was enjoying the moment with you.

Nikon Don,
I went thru this discussion on another thread and was roundly criticized for my criticism of Nikon's non-response. I went thru four different new bodies and they all sprayed spots like a graffiti artist. It is frustrating and it makes me angry too. Nikon is finally being called to task by several well known bloggers and testing sites but as of yet, they have not changed their response: ("Send us a sample photo, send us the camera at your own expense, we will clean it but there is no known problem so we cannot guarantee you won't see dust spots again.") Horse Crap!

I really wanted the D600 but I won't buy it yet. So far my D800 has held up just fine, but even it had two oil spots on the new sensor. In three years I have had two bad D7000's, 4 bad D600's, three new lenses that needed servicing within a few weeks and I am just about finished with Nikon.

Nikon is having to discount new camera models in countries around the globe to clear the pipeline of slow moving product. Their well publicized quality control issues and their customer service failure is having a free market effect. If it won't work, it won't sell. Customers are getting fed up.

As for class action - I have seen it mentioned on two other web sites as well.

My solution - a cool beverage and a visit to the great white way.

Good luck.

Look into the coastal islands like Daufuskie, Yamacraw, Kiawah. Most are resort oriented but there is still amazing coastal beauty, maritime forests and unspoiled beaches. There are also state parks in the area that have wildlife, birds, marshes and dunes without all the hotels in the background.
Fantastic photo ops on this trip. Brush up on backlighting and B&W for giant oaks, spanish moss and sea oats. Polarizers and ND filters are very helpful. Lenses from wide to tele. Heck, I wanna go, too.
Being from Maryland you should understand that a sunrise/sunset walk on the beach at 35-40 degrees with a 15mph wind will redefine wind chill. Dress accordingly. LOL
Two of my coldest photo outings started out on 60 degree sunny days with a light breeze; one off the coast of Charleston, SC, and one on the Blue Ridge Parkway in NC. Each ended with wind chills at 20 degrees and very numb hands. I now pack my photo bag with "gloves & stuff" - always. Enjoy!
Almost forgot - you may want to inquire discreetly and locally about the "VooDoo Village" aka St. Helena, SC

AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D IF-ED is the full lens designation.

I Bought the lens two years ago and had it cleaned and calibrated. There is no way to determine its production date. I also bought the TC 1.7 about a year ago. Both items look and function as brand new. There are no damage or wear marks to explain away. All the glass is pristine.
The new 70-200 f4 will take all three Nikon teleconverters.

I kept the TC 1.7 on the 300 most of the time to seal the back of the 300 lens. It has no rear lens element and dust can easily enter the tube. The combination is a really nice 500mm solution. I always shot it on a tripod and was very happy with the results. It is not the same as the $8579.00 500mm f2.8, but it costs a bit less.
I will sell the lens, teleconverter and the RRS tripod collar for $1400. (Retail = $2200.00)

Joe,
It is New. In the original Box and all the original bubble wrap. LOL

Go here for details:
http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/digitalcameras/pen-omd/e-pm1.html

It is the black version and my photos would not be as informative.
I hope this helps.

Thanks for looking,
Jim

Looking for a Nikon 24-70 f2.8 or Nikon 24-120 f4. I am willing to purchase or trade for one of these lenses.

See my list of Nikon gear for sale in separate post below.

Received as a gift, like new in box, all papers, etc. I did shoot maybe 100 test shots for fun. This is an amazing little camera.

Olympus Pen E-PM1 kit with 14-42 lens, flash. 12 megapixel, interchangeable lens camera that uses Olympus lenses.

Current Retail = $399

Sale price = $275

email, call or txt 336-416-3821

Cleaning up my system and selling the following.
Prices negotiable with multiple purchases:

Nikon D700 body - $1500-well used but loved and cared for, 80,000 actuations. 4 good batteries, charger, RRS L-bracket

Nikon 300mm F4 lens - $1100 - like new. Wonderful birding lens. RRS tripod collar and original collar.

Nikon 24-85 VR - $495 - like new in box with registration and warranty cards.

Nikon MC-36 remote - $95 - corded 10 pin for D200 to D300, D700, D800, D3, D4 bodies. Remote trigger, intervalometer, timed exposures

Nikon TC 1.7 EII - $350

RRS D7000 camera plate tripod mount - $45

email, call or text 336-416-3821

Thanks for looking,
Jim Hatchell