Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: OldSchool-WI
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 123 next>>
Feb 22, 2023 07:15:57   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
You’re still hanging onto that myth? NOBODY DID ANYTHING TO YOUR PHOTO! Go back and look at your original post. The photo is exactly as YOU posted it. You’ve since gone off on numerous diatribes against anyone that points out that your “helpful” information is often wrong.


_______________________(reply)
I have a directory for all my UHH posts and I have the copy of my Roofer photo I posted. I also downloaded the version you posted which is sized 1/25 the megabytes of mine----dull in appearance and obviously extremely degraded. Earlier you put a purple fringe on and called that from my camera. You are lower than a snake--------(you cannot comprehend the superiority of the FoveonX3 sensor---get real!--------!!!!!)
Go to
Feb 22, 2023 06:46:52   #
Grahame wrote:
You continue to dig that hole of yours deeper with each post.
Here again you demonstrate either blatant lying or that you are not in control of your faculties.


________________________(reply)
Keep it up---keep it up---smugmug----------------
Go to
Feb 22, 2023 05:39:57   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
It’s pretty disingenuous for you to call someone out for countering everything you say when that’s your modus operandi. I think we could probably reach a consensus here on who the idiot and troublemaker is. And it isn’t Grahame. Why do you get so angry? The rest of us are just having a good time.


_________________________(reply)

I have not once made trouble for honest photographic information. I have only countered the snarky degrading of helpful information I have added to various threads which has been done by a handful at every turn during this entire year---including even degrading a photo I posted, dividing the file size by 1/25th, adding artifacts and then claiming my camera was no good. Is there ANYTHING LOWER THAN THAT for a photo opinion site?-----No---I will not leave in disgust. I will stay in disgust and call out the spoilers.--------------ew
Go to
Feb 22, 2023 00:11:30   #
Grahame wrote:
Simple, the majority of your drivel ain't worth responding to.


_____________________(reply)
OHHHH? You seem to make it your business to counter--with eveything I post?----?
Go to
Feb 21, 2023 23:51:48   #
Grahame wrote:
You got that one wrong.


FijitimeGrahame, Why do you never reply to a full message, but merely pick and choose a sentence?-----
Go to
Feb 21, 2023 23:07:25   #
Grahame wrote:
I'm taking bets if anyone's interested


______________________(reply)
Hail Grahame, whomever you are----"You definitely achieve the last word on anything and everything." And that is always your goal--not photographic education. Just who are you though? Are you an AI bot in reality? (But an AI photo bot would know more about photography, though.) Probably. I would bet on that.--------------
Go to
Feb 21, 2023 19:28:52   #
selmslie wrote:
The drivel came almost exclusively from you. Everyone else can see that you have a screw loose.


__________________________(reply)
I give up----I declare you have gotten the last idiotic word in! Are you now satisfied for this round? Enough-already!---?-----------
Go to
Feb 21, 2023 07:09:56   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Closed topic? Where does it say it’s closed? If it was closed it wouldn’t allow me to post.


_________________________(reply)
The topic is answered---but, of course is not closed to the likes of you who wants five more pages of back and forth drivel who and maybe cannot sleep at night?-------------------
Go to
Feb 21, 2023 03:39:06   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
That’s about the most idiotic statement OldFool has made yet. There is absolutely no basis for that conjecture.


________________________(reply)

So who is the nut who wants another five pages on this closed topic?---Is he "SuperflyTNT" or JimJordan or Grayhame on the isele of Fiji-----who come out and lurk at night and stir the pot?--------
Go to
Feb 20, 2023 07:32:48   #
Grahame wrote:
Good to see you have finally woken up, although somewhat slow. 'ACDsee-Pro' is not exactly freeware is it?

Tip, it always pays to read the question and try and give an answer appropriate to it.


______________________________(reply)
Grahame----your snarky endless carrying on on this threat is merely you didn't like I gave the best answer right off the bat----well before you probably even read the thread. Maybe you need more sleep?-----ew
Go to
Feb 20, 2023 05:15:24   #
Grahame wrote:
But what you mapped out and consider "worked" did not 'work' with respect to the Giff files mentioned in the Op's criteria. Simple as that.

If you had not started your normal childish behavior back on page 1 I'd of given you a clue far earlier. But it's fun seeing you learning your software
But what you mapped out and consider "worked&... (show quote)


___________________________(reply)

For what I hope is the final reply to your badgering-----IF YOU READ THE ORIGINAL POST----it said file types plus gif files. I was addressng the "all other files." This question was not about gif files except as an added type. I don't use animated giff files or 8bit low color files, and have no cameras which prepare "gif files."-----------So I originally tentatively gave my solution and then upon your badgering followed though and proved my method for both JPEGs and TIFF files in removing the Exif data---WHICH WAS THE ORIGINAL POSTER'S QUESTION. Poster--("--- I would prefer something that will handle a batch of files including GIFs. Thanks,")--------------WELL NOW---after your badgering, once again----I converted my test file with the Exif data to a gif file----AND YES ALL THE Exif WAS GONE----So--my "shoot from the hip" ORIGINAL POST---Upon reading the original question---proves to work when converting to JPEG, TIFF and GIF in my viewer. I used my ACDsee-Pro to test with a gif convertion though, since gif was not on the conversion list in Classic.------------------------EW
Go to
Feb 20, 2023 00:42:33   #
Grahame wrote:
Instead all you did was concentrate on your normal victim play acting.


__________________________(reply)

I though I was trying to be "polite to you" Grahame--Fiji--Smugmug.

But you are indeed a broken record. I don't use freeware viewers or filing programs. But I am assuming those work like what I do use---the line of ACDsee programs---Classic and their Pro2. I suggested that the technique of removal when compressing with any FREEWARE program might be the same. I left the google search for freeware to the originator or even to you smarty-pants. I merely mentioned the procedure which worked with my viewer. GOT THAT? I read and answered in a responsible way from my first response which I even termed: "This is shooting from the hip." I mapped out what worked, but was not freeware, although now over 20 years old, I bet you would not need to pay ADOBE prices like some love to fork over for ACDsee-Classic?
Go to
Feb 20, 2023 00:06:45   #
Grahame wrote:
Firstly, let's note that he does not ask for anything to do with 'converting file types', just removing Exif data.

One of the things he does specifically ask is for something that will deal with Gif files. Gif files can include Exif but 'ACDsee Classic' can not be used to remove that Exif without 'changing' the file type due to it's very limited options. Something the Op may not want to do.


______________________________(reply)
First off, I though your question was removing Exif from Tiff files. So---you want now----animated Giff files?----? I don't have cameras which make animated Giff files. Do you? Since Giffs were not in any still photo discussion, I simply though you were referring to Tiff files?

With your egging, once again an hour or so back I tried the compression and conversion from a Tiff file resulting from an Olympus Raw file. At 80%, the Tiff file of 35megabytes became a JPEG of 4.5O megabytes WITHOUT exif properties to exhibit. Again that conversion in ACDsee-Classic and Exif reading in ACDsee-Pro. SO MASTER---I am again at your service---is there any more proof YOU DESIRE. Or finally is this over----Graham-Smugmug-Fiji? (Just what do you desire being called? Are you Mr. Grahame on Figi? Or do you like Smugmug?----------------ew
Go to
Feb 19, 2023 23:01:21   #
Grahame wrote:
So what happened with the Gif files that you attempted to batch remove the Exif from?

No need to worry about what programs I use/have/am familiar with, let's keep it simple and concentrate on your 'ACDsee Classic' with respect to the Ops first post.


_______________________(reply)
What next Figitime Smugmug? ACDsee-Classic instantly can change to Tiff or from Tiff to JPEGs and compress. Do you want me to check out---Tiff to JPEGs or JPEGs with Exif to Tiff or Tiff to JPEGs and compress.-----Just why would you want me to do that? I will if it will help you in any way. But do you use the ACDsee-Classic or the ACDsee-Pro? I shoot raw and PP, exiting in either Tiff or JPEG. Since my raw files are 50megabytes of data (when from Sigma-SD1), even my exiting files are large.---------------ew
Go to
Feb 19, 2023 20:38:54   #
Grahame wrote:
You are not fully defining exactly "what worked" in 'ACDsee Classic' are you? Is there a reason for that? What size batch did you test it on?


____________________(reply)
Again you are correct. I did not declare a universal pattern or result. I merely moved a group of my own photos with Exif showing ----ran those JPEGs through the convert set to 80% and the Exif disappeared. Maybe your EXIF won't disappear doing the same thing with your selected viewer and file organizer as happened in my ACDsee-Classic, which I have used for over twenty years.-------------ew (ACDsee-Classic is a small program whereby you can easily open it many times at once and view and shift files between partitions and directories. I usually have drive letters open up to "R" since my old Toughbook has four USB ports plus a card slot.)--------------ew
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 123 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.