Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ruzbynik
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
Apr 22, 2024 21:49:10   #
User ID wrote:
How is that different than an SLR ? Seems the same to me but I havent used an SLR in ages.

But OTOH the OPs complaint isnt really focus shifting and much as I love the Z, just like the OP I also wish I could nail that AF target into its position in the frame !


My experience is so far limited to SLR cameras. I will consider the z6iii when it finally shows up.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 21:38:57   #
CamB wrote:
BBF is all I ever use. Sometimes when I am waiting for the cello player to start or a whale to surface, my fingers will fiddle with the controls or ill push the BBF button and the camera will focus on something I dont want, then when the action starts and I lift the camera to my eye I find the focus point is not where I think it is going to be. Often when watching whales I want to lock the focus location so I know where it is going to be to catch the action. My D7500 and D300s have a toggle switch to lock that point in place. Not so on my new Z6. I guess I have to stop fiddling with the controls. Tough to do. I'm a fiddler.
BBF is all I ever use. Sometimes when I am waiting... (show quote)


Too much fiddly business.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 21:08:53   #
CamB wrote:
Some thoughts about going mirrorless, which I did about a month and 3000 pictures ago. (Nikon Z611). The mirrorless viewfinder is both good and bad. While composing the shot, pre-exposure, the screen looks a bit wimpy and “digital”. It is not rich and saturated as a mirrored viewfinder and the contrast range is limited. The brights can look washed out even when the histogram (the little one in the viewfinder which I really like) is telling you the exposure is fine. The jpeg from your RAW file that you see after making the exposure looks great. It’s just that pre-exposure shot that lets me down.

I like seeing the exposure change when I manipulate the controls, particularly in dark situations. The thing I miss the most on this camera, is not having a focus point lock. My last three Nikon digital cameras had a little toggle switch to lock the focus point to where I want it to be, but my Z611 has a mind off its own and I keep finding the focus point has shifted from where I left it. This is one of the biggest complaints about this camera I’ve on various NIKON forums.

The number one most annoying thing for me is the “Sub selector” (joy stick). It’s placed right where your thumb hits it when you pick up the camera, and, for the most part does the exact same thing as the “Multi Selector” which is right below it. It sticks up and wiggles and you end up moving it by accident and that shifts the focus point all over the view finder. There is nothing it does that other controls don’t do, and I would disable it if that was an option. It’s not.

The day I received the camera our Symphony Orchestra called me to shoot part of their live concert that had changed in the one day since we shot the rehearsal. This camera has a silent mode that doesn’t make a sound. This was great to use in a situation where I had to deal with an audience. No one even knew I was taking pictures. This is great.

Also, on the plus side, this camera focuses blisteringly fast with my fast, professional lenses. It is the fastest focusing camera I have ever had. The manual for this camera was obviously written by someone who already knew all about it and thought they could leave out information and no one would be bothered. I’ve wasted lots of time trying to figure out things that were barely or incompletely explained.

Regrets about going mirrorless? No. It was time to go full frame and chuck the mirrors. Is it as great as some say? No. It gobbles batteries, the EVF has room for improvement, there are too many controls on the body and no focus lock. In time I will master it and use its many strengths to make great picture. I’m always up for a challenge.

What do others think?
Some thoughts about going mirrorless, which I did ... (show quote)


For the focus shifting problem the use of BBF might be your solution. The focus will not shift on its own but requires a push of the back focus button.
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 00:07:59   #
SteveR wrote:
One person? You should have made that clear in your post rather than make it a blanket statement for many. As it is, measles is being brought across the border by many illegal immigrants. Those not protected will be vulnerable to this new wave of this dangerous disease.


Oops I must have forgot to quote reply.
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 00:00:06   #
SteveR wrote:
See my post above. There were many more "abortive" infections (40,000) which had minor symptoms. However, 51 children were paralyzed and five died. See the links that I provided. Bottom line, however, it was a production error and not a problem with the design of the vaccine by Salk.


So now we have the whole story but production errors do happen. Many people are nervous about production errors such as the Boeing aircraft failures.
Go to
Mar 17, 2024 23:32:12   #
druthven wrote:
As recipients of the Darwin awards the anti-vaxers will eventually be weeded out.


So how did humans survive before vaccines without being weeded out?
Go to
Mar 17, 2024 12:28:44   #
SteveR wrote:
How did you jump to harm being wished up people?


What other interpretation could there be to the quote "I hope that each of these selfish people get hard measles and polio."?
Go to
Mar 16, 2024 21:01:41   #
Jaymc wrote:


The selfish theme seems to be widely accepted and for the vaccine faithful there is some logical argument for it. Is it not worse though to wish harm on people who focus on natural health which is unfortunately in decline as opposed to drug based health?
Go to
Mar 14, 2024 17:23:15   #
47greyfox wrote:
The anti-vaccers will morph into a zombie apocalypse.


Your mention of the zombie apocalypse reminds me of the movie Invasion Of The Body Snatchers. In this movie, people were morphed into something resembling their former selves but somewhat different. These modified people would screech in alarm upon encountering an unmodified normal person. There is a hint of that science fiction in our new reality.
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 18:52:40   #
carlberg wrote:
My reply was lost in transmission.

Most if not all the polio infections with the Salk Vaccine were caused by a manufacturing error in one batch and had nothing to do with the fact it was an enormously effective vaccine. And the most successful Covid vaccines were based on an mRNA injection, not a spike protein injection.


MRNA or otherwise, you still end up with a big load of spike protein in excess of what an actual virus infection would cause. Before the "safe and effective" promotion weren't spike proteins were regarded as pathogenic?
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 13:21:03   #
SteveR wrote:
About 11 died from the Salk Vaccine, not 40,000. Don't believe everything you read on the Hog.


I wrote that 40,000 were infected. Fortunately most infected persons don't die. So what I wrote is actually true.
Go to
Mar 12, 2024 01:29:14   #
Silversleuth wrote:
To those ardent anti-vaxers, no amount of reason, logic or scientific data can deter them from their delusions about efficacy or dangers of vaccinations. Remember polio? Well that was pretty much wiped out by vaccination. One thing that can't be prevented or cured: Stupid.


I am optimistic that acquiring sufficient knowledge can prevent and cure stupidity. For example (no offense intended) you may be stupid regarding vaccine failures but some research can cure that. The Sabin oral polio vaccine was perhaps the best vaccine ever produced but the Salk vaccine in 1955 caused 40,000 polio infections. There are other vaccine failures and unfortunately the COVID spike protein injection will eventually be proven to be one of them. The previous sentence is just an observation of a small but growing fringe minority.
Go to
Feb 27, 2024 00:00:18   #
f8lee wrote:
To those who would like to learn what crimes against humanity have been perpetrated by the likes of F***i, the CDC and Johns Hopkins and a multitude of others I suggest reading Robert Kennedy's book "The Real Anthony F***i".

Of course, those totally brainwashed by the endless firehose of propaganda vomited forth by the media and the medical "experts" will not want to see what was done.

And let me point out that none of the perpetrators mentioned by name (the aforementioned, Bill Gates, and a host of other people and institutions) have sued Mr Kennedy - maybe because the defense against slander is that it is the t***h? That's the difference between books and media (from the rag called the New York Times to the moron in his mommy's basement spewing wh**ever on a blogpost) - the latter can get away with publishing just about anything since they can issue a "correction" a month later (which nobody ever sees).

So again, I invite all those who pompously took that holier than thou position for those of us who did not take the jab to see just how much you were hoodwinked.
To those who would like to learn what crimes again... (show quote)


That well researched book reveals a shocking history of mischief by F***i. That relentless propaganda you mention drove some people so bonkers they called for jailing those of us who refused the great spike protein experiment.
Go to
Feb 21, 2024 18:41:09   #
Yes, the easiest path is to just accept what the camera sees. Photo editing is a bit more complicated but if mastered it can elevate your photography to a higher level of artistic expression. The final result; realistic or not, need only satisfy the doer.
Go to
Feb 12, 2024 21:01:58   #
Racmanaz wrote:
So why didn't Trump turn back "democracy" in the 4 years he was in office? He didn't even come close to doing so. Your unhinged outrage is on full display. Now I can't defend what Trump said recently as you posted on here, that was reprehensible and an outlandish dangerous thing to say. Both Trump and Biden should not serve as President after this next e******n, both of them are not worthy of the office.


Isn't it strange that competition for such a high office doesn't involve a higher level of excellence than the main competitors?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.