Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Shooter41
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 91 next>>
Apr 25, 2024 11:07:33   #
Shooter41 wrote:
Dear SoHillGuy and gwendooine63 on Pixabay...Please share how the standing rider could possibly keep his two horses in the back under control and behind the three horses in the front then there is no wooden pole going down the middle of the horses to hold them together in the desired pattern when running. (The two back horses would turn to one side or the other with the rider standing on their butts, causing him to fall off. The three front horses would then go wherever they wanted after the rider fell off. Please share with us if this image was a fantasy composite image put together that could never happen in real life, due to the lack of a center wooden pole used to hold the horses together in their desired positions. Shooter41
Dear SoHillGuy and gwendooine63 on Pixabay...Pleas... (show quote)


In the photograph showing the Hungarian cowboy riding five horses at the same time, if you look carefully there is leather harness holding the three lead horses together as a group as well as leather harness holding the two horses following the three lead horses together. So if the cowboy had trained the two horses in the rear to follow the lead horses, then the magnificent display of horsemanship could have actually occurred in Hungary. The Hungarian cowboy and horseman had to be tough as a one-dollar-steak to risk falling off while galloping at that height and speed. Shooter41
Go to
Apr 24, 2024 14:52:54   #
SoHillGuy wrote:
You will need a pair of anaglyph glasses to view it in 3D.

Picture Credit: gwendoline63 on Pixabay.

3D conversion by SoHillGuy.


Dear SoHillGuy and gwendooine63 on Pixabay...Please share how the standing rider could possibly keep his two horses in the back under control and behind the three horses in the front then there is no wooden pole going down the middle of the horses to hold them together in the desired pattern when running. (The two back horses would turn to one side or the other with the rider standing on their butts, causing him to fall off. The three front horses would then go wherever they wanted after the rider fell off. Please share with us if this image was a fantasy composite image put together that could never happen in real life, due to the lack of a center wooden pole used to hold the horses together in their desired positions. Shooter41
Go to
Mar 14, 2024 10:37:12   #
a6k wrote:
Sympathy! I'm there, too. I have the RX10iv and some of my best birds and wildlife shots were taken with it. It even has animal eye recognition (cats for sure, not certain about birds).

But I'm still addicted to the higher quality raw shots from my SONY 𝜶6500. I am going to try an A-mount 70-400 on it (I have the required adapter already). Bought used, of course. I can recommend. either that lens or the FE100-400. I've used both and they are excellent with that small, lightweight camera.

I've used the Nikon-mount 150-600 and also found it too big and heavy for walking around shots.

One was taken with the 𝜶6500 and Sony FE70-200. The other with the RX10. I am fond of both. The best camera is the one you can actually carry and use.
Sympathy! I'm there, too. I have the RX10iv and so... (show quote)


Dear a6k... If I understand your reply correctly, you shot your pelican picture with a Sony a6500 camera, in natural light, editing out the limbs, tweaked the light with Pixelmotor Pro, on a Mac, in the shade. Would you mind telling me if you handheld or used a tripod, what ISO you were set at, what shutter speed you used, what aperture your lens was on and if you avoided coffee before you took the picture or are just as good at slow shutter speeds as the Sony Australian Ambassador, Mark Galen? Thank you for your time and expertise. Shooter41
Go to
Mar 14, 2024 09:11:10   #
Toment wrote:
Well, the image quality isn’t going to be what you’re used to. However, what’s more important is composition color and story. I’m sure you’ll have fun with it.


Dear a6k... I love your shot of the Pelican in the dark. I am curious to know if you used a flashlight to light the bird at night, after placing your camera on a tripod, or if you used a flash to light the entire scene and perhaps darkened the background in Lightroom during post editing. In any event, it is a magnificent shot. I would appreciate learning from your expertise in such matters. (I have enjoyed shooting indoor soccer under poor lighting conditions for the last forty-four years for a local team. But that doesn't mean that I cannot admire photographers that have other preferences and shoot exceptionally well. Shooter41


(Download)
Go to
Feb 20, 2024 08:38:42   #
Caribou wrote:
Color conveys the warmth better.


Dear Caribou...You are a very sensitive person. Thank you for your time and opinion. Shooter41
Go to
Feb 20, 2024 08:37:11   #
Bultaco wrote:
I think they both convey being silly more that love, JMHO.


Dear Bultaco...You are a very perceptive individual. Thank you for your insight, time and opinion. Shooter41
Go to
Feb 20, 2024 08:35:40   #
nervous2 wrote:
I like #2 better . . . fewer distractions and thus more impactful. At least for me.


Dear nervous2... Thank you for your time and opinion. I agree with you in that #2 is not distracted by color and goes strait to the message. Shooter41
Go to
Feb 20, 2024 08:33:04   #
luvmypets wrote:
Very cute photos!!

This is just my opinion and what I see. I have to say neither. Without any context, I look at these photos and see a man, a girl and a boy that had a really great time doing something. I would want to assume that it's a father and his children having a great time on an outing.

If I were looking for a photo that conveys love, I would be looking for a quieter and more intimate interaction. i.e. the man hugging the kids and both with their arms around him. There is a certain look on the face that conveys love, rather than a happy occasion such as the look between father and daughter as he takes her arm to walk her down the aisle.

One of the best moments I've ever seen was a video of a young man's parents coming into the hospital room after the birth of a baby and the son introducing his newborn to his dad and the child was named after the grandfather. The look of love between father and son was unmistakable.

As I stated, this is just my opinion and how I see your photos. I do like the second photo over the first.

Dodie
Very cute photos!! br br This is just my opinion ... (show quote)


Dear Dodie... Thank you for your time and opinion. Shooter41
Go to
Feb 20, 2024 08:31:32   #
RodeoMan wrote:
The first because it shows all three people better. It can always be converted to B&W where as the other image can't be made into a color one. The first image is better at reporting what the scene actually looked like. However there is a different child in each image so why not keep both.


Dear RodeoMan...Thank you for your time and opinion. Shooter41
Go to
Feb 19, 2024 23:40:26   #
NMGal wrote:
I like the second, just because.


Dear NMGal...Thank you for telling which image you preferred. (2 got the most votes) Shooter41
Go to
Feb 19, 2024 23:38:52   #
PoppieJ wrote:
i think that the second one shows 2 children and a father bonding where the first picture just shows all 3 being silly.


Dear Poppie...Thank you so much for expressing your preference and especially for giving the reason for your choice. (2 got more votes)Shooter41
Go to
Feb 19, 2024 20:12:04   #
selmslie wrote:
There are several things you can try.

First, Auto ISO can get you in trouble. Changes in the subject and background brightness can go all over the place. The image you posted was taken at ISO 12800 which almost guaranteed you would end up with a noisy shot. You should probably stay at about 6400 or below to get a couple of more stops of DR and less mid-tone noise.

Next, don't let your camera determine the exposure, use manual aperture and shutter speed. You appear to be shooting wide open so the only thing you can do to control the exposure is to lower the shutter speed. Take a test shot and look a the camera's JPEG and histogram. Don't feel you have to absolutely stop the motion. Nobody cares if there is a little subject motion blur so long as the camera itself is not causing it. Even 1/500s @ f/3.2 and ISO 3200 would have gotten the same exposure as you posted with a lot less noise. If that test exposure looks right, leave it there for the rest of the images.

Rather than crop, use a longer lens. Cropping means a lot of magnification is needed for the final image. The noise will get magnified along with it. The image you posted was heavily cropped, down to about 7MP. A 300mm lens instead of the 200mm you used will reduce your temptation to crop. You will just need to be more careful framing the shot.

Noise reduction during post processing might still be needed but doing less will keep the image sharper.
There are several things you can try. br br First... (show quote)


Dear selmslie... You are correct in that auto ISO doesn't work well at Hartman Arena because the background behind the indoor soccer players constantly varies from a snow-white banner on the far wall from my favorite spot to shoot from, to a pitch black background behind the goal at one end of the pitch. I have found that setting my ISO on 12,800 and leaving it there allows me to avoid "clipping" highlights and still remove "noise" adequately in post processing. My camera can't go more wide open with my 70-200 mm telephoto lens that I have to use than F2.8 because the action varies between 100 ft away to 8 feet away and constantly varies. But, I can try shooting at 1/1600 instead of 1/2000 second for less noise. I can't switch to the Sony 300mm lens because I need a telephoto to be able to shoot close up. Even though I am 82 now with poor eyesight, I will need to frame the images I take tightly so that I do less cropping and then post process away the noise. Thank you for your excellent selections. Shooter41
Go to
Feb 19, 2024 19:40:06   #
Please share which of the two images you select as being more effective in showing love between the subjects and what factors made you choose one over the other.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Feb 17, 2024 11:41:07   #
jaymatt wrote:
This is really nice. Great capture; great presentation--I really like the black and white.

Dear jaymatt...I changed the shot from color to black and white in photoshop because I preferred my viewers to see the emotions on our faces towards each other, rather than being distracted by strong colors. Shooter41
Go to
Feb 17, 2024 02:35:52   #
User ID wrote:
Likewise for myself. So why is it that we both shunned Fuji ?!? Ive wondered about that all alone, late in the night, when the wind howls, but now I get to ask a fellow traveler.


Dear User ID...Actually I never shunned Fuji. Instead in 1980, I began purchasing used cameras and lenses from the Eagle-Beacon sports photographers who were photographing the Wichita Wings Indoor Professional Soccer team un poor lighting conditions at the Kansas Coliseum and teaching me photography on the fly. Later, when I knew a little more about photography, I began buying cameras and lenses that not only were designed to be good under low light , high action sporting events and conditions, but were also within my budget. I have nothing against Fuji. Shooter41
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 91 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.